IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/conmgt/v24y2006i6p579-589.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Linkage measures of the construction sector using the hypothetical extraction method

Author

Listed:
  • Yu Song
  • Chunlu Liu
  • Craig Langston

Abstract

The hypothetical extraction method (HEM) is used to extract a sector hypothetically from an economic system and examine the influence of this extraction on other sectors in the economy. Linkage measures based on the HEM become increasingly prominent. However, little construction linkage research applies the HEM. Using the recently published Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development input-output database at constant prices, this research applies the HEM to the construction sector in order to explore the role of this sector in national economies and the quantitative interdependence between the construction sector and the remaining sectors. The output differences before and after the hypothetical extraction reflect the linkages of the construction sector. Empirical results show a declining trend of the total, backward and forward linkages, which confirms the decreasing role of the construction sector with economic maturity over the examined period from a new angle. Analytical results reveal that the unique nature of the construction sector and multifold external factors are the main reasons for the linkage difference between countries. Moreover, hypothesis-testing results consider statistically that the extraction structures employed in this research are appropriate to analyse the linkages of the construction sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu Song & Chunlu Liu & Craig Langston, 2006. "Linkage measures of the construction sector using the hypothetical extraction method," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(6), pages 579-589.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:24:y:2006:i:6:p:579-589
    DOI: 10.1080/01446190500435358
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01446190500435358
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01446190500435358?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Duarte, Rosa & Sanchez-Choliz, Julio & Bielsa, Jorge, 2002. "Water use in the Spanish economy: an input-output approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 71-85, November.
    2. Cella, Guido, 1984. "The Input-Output Measurement of Interindustry Linkages," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 46(1), pages 73-84, February.
    3. Roberto Pietroforte & Ranko Bon, 1999. "The Italian residential construction sector: an input-output historical analysis," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 297-303.
    4. Polenske, Karen R & Sivitanides, Petros, 1990. "Linkages in the Construction Sector," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 24(2), pages 147-161.
    5. Chan Swee Lean, 2001. "Empirical tests to discern linkages between construction and other economic sectors in Singapore," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 355-363.
    6. Clements, Benedict J., 1990. "On the decomposition and normalization of interindustry linkages," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 337-340, August.
    7. Junning Cai & Pingsun Leung, 2004. "Linkage Measures: a Revisit and a Suggested Alternative," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 63-83.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhaocheng Li & Yu Song, 2022. "Energy Consumption Linkages of the Chinese Construction Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-13, February.
    2. Haddad, Eduardo Amaral & Perobelli, Fernando Salgueiro & Araújo, Inácio Fernandes, 2020. "Input-Output Analysis of COVID-19: Methodology for Assessing the Impacts of Lockdown Measures," TD NEREUS 1-2020, Núcleo de Economia Regional e Urbana da Universidade de São Paulo (NEREUS).
    3. Umed Temurshoev, 2010. "Identifying Optimal Sector Groupings With The Hypothetical Extraction Method," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(4), pages 872-890, October.
    4. Peiteng Shi & Jiang Zhang & Bo Yang & Jingfei Luo, 2014. "Hierarchicality of Trade Flow Networks Reveals Complexity of Products," Papers 1401.3103, arXiv.org.
    5. Wang, Yuan & Wang, Wenqin & Mao, Guozhu & Cai, Hua & Zuo, Jian & Wang, Lili & Zhao, Peng, 2013. "Industrial CO2 emissions in China based on the hypothetical extraction method: Linkage analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1238-1244.
    6. Du, Huibin & Chen, Zhenni & Peng, Binbin & Southworth, Frank & Ma, Shoufeng & Wang, Yuan, 2019. "What drives CO2 emissions from the transport sector? A linkage analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 195-204.
    7. Bösch, Matthias & Jochem, Dominik & Weimar, Holger & Dieter, Matthias, 2015. "Physical input-output accounting of the wood and paper flow in Germany," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 99-109.
    8. Jaime Bonet‐Morón & Diana Ricciulli‐Marín & Gerson Javier Pérez‐Valbuena & Luis Armando Galvis‐Aponte & Eduardo A. Haddad & Inácio F. Araújo & Fernando S. Perobelli, 2020. "Regional economic impact of COVID‐19 in Colombia: An input–output approach," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(6), pages 1123-1150, December.
    9. Jie Wu & Jacob Wood & Xianhai Huang, 2021. "How does GVC reconstruction affect economic growth and employment? Analysis of USA–China decoupling," Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, The Crawford School, The Australian National University, vol. 35(1), pages 67-81, May.
    10. Peiteng Shi & Jiang Zhang & Bo Yang & Jingfei Luo, 2014. "Hierarchicality of Trade Flow Networks Reveals Complexity of Products," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-10, June.
    11. Eduardo A. Haddad & Karim El Aynaoui & Abdelaaziz Ait Ali & Mahmoud Arbouch & Inácio F. Araújo, 2020. "The Impact Of Covid-19 In Morocco: Macroeconomic, Sectoral And Regional Effects," Research papers & Policy papers on Economic Trends and Policies 2080, Policy Center for the New South.
    12. Liu, Bin & Gao, Qun & Jin, Hongyu & Lei, Yu & Liu, Chunlu, 2022. "System indeterminacy analysis in the embodied energy network of global construction industries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PA).
    13. Honghao Ren & Henk Folmer & Arno Vlist, 2014. "What role does the real estate–construction sector play in China’s regional economy?," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 52(3), pages 839-857, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Yuan & Wang, Wenqin & Mao, Guozhu & Cai, Hua & Zuo, Jian & Wang, Lili & Zhao, Peng, 2013. "Industrial CO2 emissions in China based on the hypothetical extraction method: Linkage analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1238-1244.
    2. Umed Temurshoev, 2010. "Identifying Optimal Sector Groupings With The Hypothetical Extraction Method," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(4), pages 872-890, October.
    3. Shinichiro Kimura, 2022. "Secular change of interdependencies in the clusters of the Japanese motor vehicle industry: a case study in the Tokai region," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(11), pages 1-12, November.
    4. Junning Cai & Pingsun Leung, 2004. "Linkage Measures: a Revisit and a Suggested Alternative," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 63-83.
    5. Qinghua Li & Cong Chen, 2023. "Analyzing the Differences in the Quantitative and Spatial Characteristics of Inter-Provincial Embodied Carbon Transfers in China Induced via Various Demand Factors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-29, November.
    6. Sajid, M. Jawad & Cao, Qingren & Kang, Wei, 2019. "Transport sector carbon linkages of EU's top seven emitters," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 24-38.
    7. Holz, Carsten A., 2011. "The unbalanced growth hypothesis and the role of the state: The case of China's state-owned enterprises," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 220-238, November.
    8. Guilhoto, J. J. M. & Sesso Filho, U. A., 2005. "Estimação da Matriz Insumo-Produto a Partir De Dados Preliminares das Contas Nacionais [Estimation of input-output matrix using preliminary data from national accounts]," MPRA Paper 38212, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Muhammad Jawad Sajid & Ernesto D. R. Santibanez Gonzalez, 2021. "The Impact of Direct and Indirect COVID-19 Related Demand Shocks on Sectoral CO 2 Emissions: Evidence from Major Asia Pacific Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    10. Fitsum Semere Weldegiorgis & Evelyn Dietsche & Shabbir Ahmad, 2023. "Inter-Sectoral Economic Linkages in the Mining Industries of Botswana and Tanzania: Analysis Using Partial Hypothetical Extraction Method," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-26, June.
    11. Moretto, Antonio Carlos & Rodrigues, Rossana Lott & Sesso Filho, Umberto Antonio & Guilhoto, Joaquim José Martins & Maia, Katy, 2012. "Regiões polarizadas no Paraná: relações inter setoriais e inter regionais em 2006," MPRA Paper 46996, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Fernando Salgueiro Perobelli & Eduardo Amaral Haddad & Edson Paulo Domingues, 2009. "Interdependence among the Brazilian States: An Input-Output Approach," Chapters, in: Mahtab A. Farschi & Odile E.M. Janne & Philip McCann (ed.), Technological Change and Mature Industrial Regions, chapter 4, pages 44-63, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. Chokri Dridi & Geoffrey Hewings, 2002. "An Investigation of Industry Associations, Association Loops and Economic Complexity: Application to Canada and the United States," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 275-296.
    14. Alp, Esra & Kök, Recep & Başkol, Murat Ozan, 2017. "Türkiye Ekonomisinde Sürükleyici Endüstri Analizi:2002-2012 Karşılaştırması [Key Sector Analysis in Turkish Economy: A Compare Between 2002-2012]," MPRA Paper 89952, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Chan Swee Lean, 2001. "Empirical tests to discern linkages between construction and other economic sectors in Singapore," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 355-363.
    16. Joaquim J. M. Guilhoto & Silvio Massaru Ichihara & Márcio Guerra Amorim, 2010. "Structural Analysis of Employment in the Brazilian Economy: 1996 and 2002 Compared," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Hadi Salehi Esfahani & Giovanni Facchini & Geoffrey J. D. Hewings (ed.), Economic Development in Latin America, chapter 12, pages 179-200, Palgrave Macmillan.
    17. Tian, Jing & Andraded, Celio & Lumbreras, Julio & Guan, Dabo & Wang, Fangzhi & Liao, Hua, 2018. "Integrating Sustainability Into City-level CO2 Accounting: Social Consumption Pattern and Income Distribution," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 1-16.
    18. Quddus, Md. Abdul, 2021. "Interdependence Of Industries And Key Economic Sectors Based On Linkage Indices: Emphasis On Agriculture," Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Economics, Bangladesh Agricultural University, vol. 42(2), December.
    19. Guilhoto, Joaquim J.M., 1995. "Um modelo computável de equilíbrio geral para planejamento e análise de políticas agrícolas (PAPA) na economia brasileira [A computable general equilibrium model for planning and analysis of agricu," MPRA Paper 42349, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Guilhoto, Joaquim José Martins, 2011. "Análise de Insumo-Produto: Teoria e Fundamentos [Input-Output Analysis: Theory and Foundations]," MPRA Paper 32566, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:conmgt:v:24:y:2006:i:6:p:579-589. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCME20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.