IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/acctbr/v45y2015i4p485-509.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The role of accounting in the twenty-first century firm

Author

Listed:
  • Jerold L. Zimmerman

Abstract

I explore the evolving role of accounting information in allocating capital. Accounting arose to control conflicts of interest in organizations (stewardship role). The industrial revolution spawned capital-intensive firms and public capital markets with dispersed shareholders to finance these firms. The regulation of these public capital markets shifted the role of accounting toward providing investors with information for making informed investment decisions (valuation role). With the advent of the semiconductor and global competition, emerging and public firms today differ from their predecessors in fundamental ways. Exploiting the information technologies created by the semiconductor, twenty-first century firms are now more knowledge based, have more intangible assets, are more reliant on their employees' human capital, confront increased competition, and face diverse conflicts of interests and hence different challenges accessing capital than their forerunners. Responding to the demands of twenty-first century firms, private-equity (PE) markets provide a bundled service - capital and governance. To supply this bundle, PE firms require accounting information to control the conflicts of interest both within the PE firm (between the general and limited partners) and within their investees. Controlling these conflicts shifts the role of accounting back toward its original stewardship roots. The valuation role remains important, but there is little to value unless the conflicts of interest are first mitigated.

Suggested Citation

  • Jerold L. Zimmerman, 2015. "The role of accounting in the twenty-first century firm," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(4), pages 485-509, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:45:y:2015:i:4:p:485-509
    DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2015.1035549
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00014788.2015.1035549
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00014788.2015.1035549?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Colin Mayer & Julian Franks & Stefano Rossi, 2002. "The Origination and Evolution of Ownership and Control," Economics Series Working Papers 2003-FE-01, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    2. Vladimir Atanasov & Vladimir Ivanov & Kate Litvak, 2007. "The Impact of Litigation on Venture Capitalist Reputation," NBER Working Papers 13641, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vitor Azzari & Emerson Wagner Mainardes & Aziz Xavier Beiruth & Fábio M. Costa, 2021. "The dimensions of accounting service quality," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(8), pages 1-31, August.
    2. Majeed, Muhammad Ansar & Yan, Chao, 2021. "Financial statement comparability, state ownership, and the cost of debt: Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    3. Annalisa Prencipe, 2017. "Past evolution and recent trends in accounting research," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(2), pages 51-60.
    4. Christian Rainero & Giuseppe Modarelli & Alessandro Migliavacca & Riccardo Coda, 2021. "Early Traces of Materiality and Relevance Principles in Luca Pacioli’s Tractatus XI," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(9), pages 153-153, July.
    5. Brad Potter & Matthew Pinnuck & George Tanewski & Sue Wright, 2019. "Keeping it private: financial reporting by large proprietary companies in Australia," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 59(1), pages 87-113, March.
    6. Tatiana Fedyk & Zvi Singer & Mark Soliman, 2017. "The sharpest tool in the shed: IPO financial statement management of STEM vs. non-STEM firms," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 1541-1581, December.
    7. Michael Minnis & Nemit Shroff, 2017. "Why regulate private firm disclosure and auditing?," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(5), pages 473-502, July.
    8. Corinne Ollier Bessieux & Emmanuelle Negre & Marie-Anne Verdier, 2022. "Moving from Accounting for People to Accounting with People: A Critical Analysis of the Literature and Avenues for Research," Post-Print hal-03889478, HAL.
    9. John Richard Edwards & Trevor Boyns, 2022. "Published Accounts, Stewardship, and Decision Making: A Case Study 1863–1940," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 58(2), pages 300-333, June.
    10. Teodor HADA & Nicoleta BARBUTA-MISU & Teodora Maria AVRAM, 2016. "Financial CEMATT Method: a New Approach for Performance Assessment using Accounting Information," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 2, pages 10-17.
    11. Madaleno Mara & Bărbuţă-Mişu Nicoleta, 2019. "The Financial Performance of European Companies: Explanatory Factors in the Context of Economic Crisis," Ekonomika (Economics), Sciendo, vol. 98(2), pages 6-18, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria‐Teresa Marchica & Roberto Mura, 2005. "Direct and Ultimate Ownership Structures in the UK: an intertemporal perspective over the last decade," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(1), pages 26-45, January.
    2. Pablo Casas-Arce & Albert Saiz, 2010. "Owning versus Renting: Do Courts Matter?," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 53(1), pages 137-165, February.
    3. Claessens, Stijn & Yurtoglu, B. Burcin, 2013. "Corporate governance in emerging markets: A survey," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 15(C), pages 1-33.
    4. Thorsten Beck & Ross Levine, 2008. "Legal Institutions and Financial Development," Springer Books, in: Claude Ménard & Mary M. Shirley (ed.), Handbook of New Institutional Economics, chapter 11, pages 251-278, Springer.
    5. Ross Levine, 2005. "Law, Endowments and Property Rights," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 19(3), pages 61-88, Summer.
    6. Enrico Perotti & Ernst-Ludwig von Thadden, 2005. "The Political Economy of Corporate Control," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 05-102/2, Tinbergen Institute.
    7. Enrico C. Perotti & Ernst-Ludwig von Thadden, 2006. "Corporate Governance and the Distribution of Wealth: A Political-Economy Perspective," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 162(1), pages 204-217, March.
    8. Pistor, Katharina, 2009. "Global network finance: Institutional innovation in the global financial market place," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 552-567, December.
    9. Hilt, Eric, 2008. "When did Ownership Separate from Control? Corporate Governance in the Early Nineteenth Century," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 68(3), pages 645-685, September.
    10. Santella, Paolo & Baffi, Enrico & Drago, Carlo & Lattuca, Dino, 2008. "A Comparative Analysis of the Legal Obstacles to Institutional Investor Activism in Europe and in the US," MPRA Paper 8929, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Bardhan, Pranab, 2005. "Law and Economics in the Tropics: Some Reflections," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 65-74, March.
    12. Van der Elst, Christoph, 2004. "Industry-specificities and size of corporations: determinants of ownership structures," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 425-446, December.
    13. Branko Urosevic, 2001. "Moral hazard and dynamics of insider ownership stakes," Economics Working Papers 787, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, revised Oct 2004.
    14. Enrico C. Perotti & Ernst-Ludwig von Thadden, 2004. "The Political Economy of Dominant Investors," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 04-091/2, Tinbergen Institute.
    15. C. van der Elst, 2004. "Industry-specificities and Size of Corporations: Determinants of Ownership Structures," Working Papers 04-19, Utrecht School of Economics.
    16. H. Yeung, 2006. "Change and Continuity in Southeast Asian Ethnic Chinese Business," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 229-254, September.
    17. Pablo Casas-Arce & Albert Saiz, 2006. "Owning versus leasing: do courts matter?," Working Papers 06-21, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.
    18. Gérard Hirigoyen & Thierry Poulain-Rehm, 2017. "Comparative approach of governance models: an empirical study [Approche comparative des modèles de gouvernance : Une étude empirique]," Post-Print hal-02521878, HAL.
    19. Tylecote, Andrew & Ramirez, Paulina, 2006. "Corporate governance and innovation: The UK compared with the US and 'insider' economies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 160-180, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:acctbr:v:45:y:2015:i:4:p:485-509. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RABR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.