IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spt/admaec/v16y2026i5f16_5_1.html

Public Servants or Interest Agents? The Effects of Political-Business Collusion and Public Representation on Political Trust and Voting Intention

Author

Listed:
  • Yu-Han Weng
  • Cheng-Hua Wang
  • Chung-Te Ting

Abstract

This study examines how citizens’ perceptions of elected representatives influence voting intention through the mediating role of political trust. An integrated framework is developed to incorporate both negative and positive evaluations of representatives, namely perceived political-business collusion and perceived public representation. Data were collected from 423 valid respondents in Tainan, Taiwan, and analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM). The results indicate that perceived political-business collusion has a significant negative effect on political trust, whereas perceived public representation exerts a significant positive effect. Moreover, political trust significantly enhances voting intention. Mediation analysis further confirms that political trust serves as a key mechanism linking citizens’ evaluations of elected representatives to their behavioral intentions. This study contributes to the literature by demonstrating the dual effects of contrasting perceptions on political trust formation and highlighting the central role of political trust in shaping voting intention. The findings also provide important policy implications, suggesting that enhancing transparency, strengthening accountability, and improving representative responsiveness are essential for fostering political trust and promoting democratic participation. JEL classification numbers: D72, D73, H11.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu-Han Weng & Cheng-Hua Wang & Chung-Te Ting, 2026. "Public Servants or Interest Agents? The Effects of Political-Business Collusion and Public Representation on Political Trust and Voting Intention," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 16(5), pages 1-1.
    • Handle: RePEc:spt:admaec:v:16:y:2026:i:5:f:16_5_1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.scienpress.com/Upload/AMAE%2fVol%2016_5_1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rainer, Helmut & Siedler, Thomas, 2009. "Does democracy foster trust?," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 251-269, June.
    2. Alessandro, Martin & Cardinale Lagomarsino, Bruno & Scartascini, Carlos & Streb, Jorge & Torrealday, Jerónimo, 2021. "Transparency and Trust in Government. Evidence from a Survey Experiment," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    3. Michele Crepaz & Gizem Arikan, 2024. "The effects of transparency regulation on political trust and perceived corruption: Evidence from a survey experiment," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(3), pages 896-913, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heineck, Guido & Süssmuth, Bernd, 2013. "A different look at Lenin’s legacy: Social capital and risk taking in the Two Germanies," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 789-803.
    2. Daniel Horn & Hubert Kiss Janos & Sára Khayouti, 2020. "Does trust associate with political regime?," KRTK-KTI WORKING PAPERS 2013, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    3. Sascha O. Becker & Lukas Mergele & Ludger Woessmann, 2020. "The Separation and Reunification of Germany: Rethinking a Natural Experiment Interpretation of the Enduring Effects of Communism," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 34(2), pages 143-171, Spring.
    4. Nicolas R. Ziebarth & Gert G. Wagner, 2013. "Top-down v. Bottom-up: The Long-Term Impact of Government Ideology and Personal Experience on Values," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1280, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    5. Tim Friehe & Mario Mechtel, 2014. "Statuskonsum in Ost- und Westdeutschland: Beeinflusst durch das politische Regime?," ifo Dresden berichtet, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 21(03), pages 31-36, June.
    6. Eibich, Peter & Ziebarth, Nicolas, 2014. "Examining the Structure of Spatial Health Effects in Germany Using Hierarchical Bayes Models," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 49, pages 305-320.
    7. Eder, Christoph & Halla, Martin, 2018. "On the Origin and Composition of the German East-West Population Gap," IZA Discussion Papers 12031, IZA Network @ LISER.
    8. Antonin Bergeaud & Max Deter & Maria Greve & Michael Wyrwich, 2025. "Migration and Innovation: The Impact of East German Inventors on West Germany’s Technological Development," Berlin School of Economics Discussion Papers 0059, Berlin School of Economics.
    9. Uwe Jirjahn, Cornelia Struewing, 2018. "Single Motherhood in East and West Germany: What Can Explain the Differences?," European Journal of Comparative Economics, Cattaneo University (LIUC), vol. 15(2), pages 197-229, December.
    10. Costa-Font, Joan & Nicińska, Anna, 2023. "Comrades in the family? Soviet communism and demand for family insurance," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118472, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Lippmann, Quentin & Senik, Claudia, 2018. "Math, girls and socialism," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 874-888.
    12. Bucher-Koenen, Tabea & Lamla, Bettina, 2014. "The long Shadow of Socialism: On East-West German Differences in Financial Literacy," VfS Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy 100585, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    13. Becchetti, Leonardo & Conzo, Pierluigi, 2011. "Enhancing capabilities through credit access: Creditworthiness as a signal of trustworthiness under asymmetric information," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(3-4), pages 265-278, April.
    14. Ardanaz, Martin & Otálvaro-Ramírez, Susana & Scartascini, Carlos, 2023. "Does information about citizen participation initiatives increase political trust?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    15. Bauernschuster, Stefan & Falck, Oliver & Gold, Robert & Heblich, Stephan, 2012. "The shadows of the socialist past: Lack of self-reliance hinders entrepreneurship," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 485-497.
    16. Michele Crepaz & Gizem Arikan, 2024. "The effects of transparency regulation on political trust and perceived corruption: Evidence from a survey experiment," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(3), pages 896-913, July.
    17. Michael Wyrwich & Michael Stuetzer & Rolf Sternberg, 2016. "Entrepreneurial role models, fear of failure, and institutional approval of entrepreneurship: a tale of two regions," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 467-492, March.
    18. Hyll, Walter & Schneider, Lutz, 2016. "Social Comparisons and Attitudes towards Foreigners. Evidence from the ‘Fall of the Iron Curtain’," IWH Discussion Papers 12/2016, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    19. Cobb-Clark, Deborah A. & Dahmann, Sarah C. & Kamhöfer, Daniel A. & Schildberg-Hörisch, Hannah, 2022. "The Determinants of Population Self-Control," IZA Discussion Papers 15175, IZA Network @ LISER.
    20. Alexander Kupfer & Julia Oberndorfer & Felix Kunz, 2022. "Why do corporate cash holdings differ within reunified Germany?," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 92(2), pages 197-232, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D72 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
    • D73 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Bureaucracy; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations; Corruption
    • H11 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - Structure and Scope of Government

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spt:admaec:v:16:y:2026:i:5:f:16_5_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eleftherios Spyromitros-Xioufis (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.scienpress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.