IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spt/admaec/v14y2024i4f14_4_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Investor Attention Affect Corporate Greenwashing? Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Hui Zhi
  • Yuanying Chi
  • Rui Peng
  • Kaiye Gao

Abstract

Enhancing ESG performance has emerged as a crucial strategy for companies to bolster market value and competitiveness. However, this trend has sparked concerns about corporate greenwashing, where companies may selectively disclose ESG-related information to garner short-term benefits. Against this backdrop, using Chinese A-share listed companies from 2010 to 2022, we examine the impact of investor attention on corporate greenwashing. The findings reveal that investor attention significantly curbs corporate greenwashing. Mechanism analysis indicates that investor attention achieves this by alleviating corporate financing constraints and enhancing transparency in corporate information. Furthermore, moderating analysis suggests that enhancing internal controls and increasing environmental subsidies can strengthen the inhibitory effect of investor attention on corporate greenwashing. Finally, heterogeneity analysis demonstrates that the inhibitory effect of investor attention on corporate greenwashing is more pronounced in state-owned enterprises and companies facing high financing constraints. These findings not only contribute to the literature on investor attention but also offer insights for governing corporate greenwashing and advancing the dual-carbon goal. Â

Suggested Citation

  • Hui Zhi & Yuanying Chi & Rui Peng & Kaiye Gao, 2024. "Does Investor Attention Affect Corporate Greenwashing? Evidence from China," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 14(4), pages 1-6.
    • Handle: RePEc:spt:admaec:v:14:y:2024:i:4:f:14_4_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.scienpress.com/Upload/AMAE%2fVol%2014_4_6.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhenjie Wang & Jiewei Zhang, 2023. "Nexus between corporate environmental performance and corporate environmental responsibility on innovation performance," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(10), pages 11645-11672, October.
    2. Zhao, Xuezhou & Fang, Libing & Zhang, Ke, 2023. "Online search attention, firms’ ESG and operating performance," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 223-236.
    3. Matt Wegener & Fayez A. Elayan & Sandra Felton & Jingyu Li, 2013. "Factors Influencing Corporate Environmental Disclosures," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(1), pages 53-73, March.
    4. Tan, Xiujie & Liu, Gufeng & Cheng, Si, 2024. "How does ESG performance affect green transformation of resource-based enterprises: Evidence from Chinese listed enterprises," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    5. Liu, Yuxiang & Zhang, Jiewei & Dai, Yue, 2023. "Analyst following and greenwashing decision," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PC).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joel A. Martínez-Regalado & Cinthia Leonora Murillo-Avalos & Purificación Vicente-Galindo & Mónica Jiménez-Hernández & José Luis Vicente-Villardón, 2021. "Using HJ-Biplot and External Logistic Biplot as Machine Learning Methods for Corporate Social Responsibility Practices for Sustainable Development," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(20), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Antonio J. Mateo-Márquez & José M. González-González & Constancio Zamora-Ramírez, 2021. "Components of Countries’ Regulative Dimensions and Voluntary Carbon Disclosures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, February.
    3. Mumtaheena Anwar & Sohanur Rahman & Md. Nurul Kabir, 2021. "Does national carbon pricing policy affect voluntary environmental disclosures? A global evidence," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 23(2), pages 211-244, April.
    4. Patrick Velte, 2023. "Which institutional investors drive corporate sustainability? A systematic literature review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 42-71, January.
    5. Lyton Chithambo & Ishmael Tingbani & Godfred Afrifa Agyapong & Ernest Gyapong & Isaac Sakyi Damoah, 2020. "Corporate voluntary greenhouse gas reporting: Stakeholder pressure and the mediating role of the chief executive officer," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 1666-1683, May.
    6. Tauringana, Venancio & Chithambo, Lyton, 2015. "The effect of DEFRA guidance on greenhouse gas disclosure," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(4), pages 425-444.
    7. Mitzi Isabel Cubilla‐Montilla & Purificación Galindo‐Villardón & Ana Belén Nieto‐Librero & María Purificación Vicente Galindo & Isabel María García‐Sánchez, 2020. "What companies do not disclose about their environmental policy and what institutional pressures may do to respect," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3), pages 1181-1197, May.
    8. Daniel Kouloukoui & Marcia Mara de Oliveira Marinho & Sônia Maria da Silva Gomes & Pieter de Jong & Asher Kiperstok & Ednildo Andrade Torres, 2020. "The impact of the board of directors on business climate change management: case of Brazilian companies," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 127-147, January.
    9. Antonio J. Mateo‐Márquez & José M. González‐González & Constancio Zamora‐Ramírez, 2021. "The influence of countries' climate change‐related institutional profile on voluntary environmental disclosures," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 1357-1373, February.
    10. Melloni, Gaia, 2020. "Climate change reporting: a commentary on key issues," Die Unternehmung - Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 74(3), pages 312-323.
    11. Anis Maaloul, 2018. "The effect of greenhouse gas emissions on cost of debt: Evidence from Canadian firms," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(6), pages 1407-1415, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spt:admaec:v:14:y:2024:i:4:f:14_4_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eleftherios Spyromitros-Xioufis (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.scienpress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.