IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/waterr/v39y2025i6d10.1007_s11269-024-04078-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reallocating Shared Groundwater Resources Using a Participatory Two- level Weighted Bankruptcy Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Ali Tolouei Virani

    (Hakim Sabzevari University)

  • Reza Javidi Sabbaghian

    (Hakim Sabzevari University)

  • Bardia Roghani

    (NTNU)

  • Ehsan Bahrami Jovein

    (University of Torbat Heydarieh)

  • Mohammad Fereshtehpour

    (University of Western Ontario)

Abstract

The increasing global demand for limited groundwater resources, especially in (semi-)arid regions, might lead to conflicts among stakeholders. To address this, Bankruptcy Theory methods can be applied to reallocate water resources more equitably, particularly in deficit cases or competing claims. This study introduces a two-level bankruptcy framework, identifying plains as stakeholders and their beneficiaries (agriculture, drinking, and industry). To assess the stakeholders’ relative importance, a set of sustainable development indicators is proposed. Additionally, a new method, Weighted Combinational Contribution-Claim (WCCC), is introduced, considering both claims and contributions in resource distribution. This method aims to support parties that contribute more to recharge of shared water resources, ensuring they face less deficit. The framework was applied to the Neyshabour-Ataiyeh-Sabzevar plains in Iran. According to the Bankruptcy Allocation Stability Index (BASI), the preferred deficit-based method in the first reallocation level (among stakeholders) was the Weighted Constrained Equal Losses (WCEL), allocating 77% to Neyshabour, 11% to Sabzevar, and 12% to Ataiyeh. Conversely, the preferred resources-based method was the Weighted Constrained Equal Awards (WCEA). At the second level, WCCC was selected as the preferred deficit-based method for all beneficiaries, allocating 87%, 11%, and 2% of the shared resource to agricultural, drinking, and industrial demands, respectively. Among the resources-based methods, the Weighted Proportional (WPRO) was favored by Neyshabour’s beneficiaries, whereas the Weighted Talmud (WTAL) was preferred by the beneficiaries of Sabzevar and Ataiyeh. This novel approach ensures fair reallocation among stakeholders and their beneficiaries, adhering to sustainable development goals and optimizing resource distribution in water management.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Ali Tolouei Virani & Reza Javidi Sabbaghian & Bardia Roghani & Ehsan Bahrami Jovein & Mohammad Fereshtehpour, 2025. "Reallocating Shared Groundwater Resources Using a Participatory Two- level Weighted Bankruptcy Framework," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 39(6), pages 2567-2589, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:39:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1007_s11269-024-04078-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s11269-024-04078-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-024-04078-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11269-024-04078-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Parisa-Sadat Ashofteh & Shirin Moradi Far & Parvin Golfam, 2023. "Application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making of CODAS and SWARA in Reservoir Optimal Operation Using Marine Predator Algorithm Based on Game Theory," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(11), pages 4385-4412, September.
    2. Hojjat Mianabadi & Erik Mostert & Saket Pande & Nick van de Giesen, 2015. "Weighted Bankruptcy Rules and Transboundary Water Resources Allocation," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(7), pages 2303-2321, May.
    3. Jacob Rightnar & Ariel Dinar, 2020. "The Welfare Implications of Bankruptcy Allocation of the Colorado River Water: The Case of the Salton Sea Region," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(8), pages 2353-2370, June.
    4. Katharina Gompf & Marzia Traverso & Jörg Hetterich, 2021. "Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to Introduce Weights to Social Life Cycle Assessment of Mobility Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-10, January.
    5. Shirin Moradi Far & Parisa-Sadat Ashofteh, 2024. "Optimization Operation of Water Resources Using Game Theory and Marine Predator Algorithm," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 38(2), pages 665-699, January.
    6. Casas-Méndez, Balbina & Fragnelli, Vito & García-Jurado, Ignacio, 2011. "Weighted bankruptcy rules and the museum pass problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 215(1), pages 161-168, November.
    7. Dagmawi Mulugeta Degefu & Weijun He, 2016. "Allocating Water under Bankruptcy Scenario," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(11), pages 3949-3964, September.
    8. Yang Zheng & Xuefeng Sang & Zhiwu Liu & Siqi Zhang & Pan Liu, 2022. "Water Allocation Management Under Scarcity: a Bankruptcy Approach," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(9), pages 2891-2912, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dagmawi Mulugeta Degefu & Weijun He & Liang Yuan & An Min & Qi Zhang, 2018. "Bankruptcy to Surplus: Sharing Transboundary River Basin’s Water under Scarcity," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(8), pages 2735-2751, June.
    2. Mahboubeh Kalantari & Mohammad Reza Nikoo & Nasser Talebbeydokhti, 2025. "Assessment of renewable water in the face of climate change by a comprehensive analysis of adaptation strategies," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 178(3), pages 1-24, March.
    3. Shahmir Janjua & Duc-Anh An-Vo & Kathryn Reardon-Smith & Shahbaz Mushtaq, 2025. "A Three-stage Cooperative Game Model for Water Resource Allocation Under Scarcity Using Bankruptcy Rules, Nash Bargaining Solution and TOPSIS," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 39(7), pages 3553-3576, May.
    4. Dagmawi Mulugeta Degefu & Weijun He & Liang Yuan, 2017. "Monotonic Bargaining Solution for Allocating Critically Scarce Transboundary Water," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(9), pages 2627-2644, July.
    5. Mehdi Kazemi & Omid Bozorg-Haddad & Elahe Fallah-Mehdipour & Xuefeng Chu, 2022. "Optimal water resources allocation in transboundary river basins according to hydropolitical consideration," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 1188-1206, January.
    6. Carlos Gutiérrez-Martín & José A. Gómez-Limón & Nazaret M. Montilla-López, 2022. "Priority Water Rights for Irrigation at the River Basin Level. Do They Improve Economic Efficiency During Drought Periods?," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(10), pages 3737-3758, August.
    7. Xinxin Liu & Xiaosheng Wang & Haiying Guo & Xiaojie An, 2021. "Benefit Allocation in Shared Water-Saving Management Contract Projects Based on Modified Expected Shapley Value," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(1), pages 39-62, January.
    8. Vito Fragnelli & Gianfranco Gambarelli, 2014. "Further open problems in cooperative games," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 24(4), pages 51-62.
    9. Ricardo Martínez & Joaquín Sánchez-Soriano, 2021. "Social solidarity with dummies in the museum pass problem," ThE Papers 21/11, Department of Economic Theory and Economic History of the University of Granada..
    10. Jiaxuan Chang & Xuefeng Sang & Junlin Qu & Yangwen Jia & Lin Wang & Haokai Ding, 2025. "Hierarchical Temporal-Scale Framework for Real-Time Streamflow Prediction in Reservoir-Regulated Basins," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-22, April.
    11. José Carlos Romero & Pedro Linares, 2021. "Multiple Criteria Decision-Making as an Operational Conceptualization of Energy Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-14, October.
    12. Idiano D’Adamo & Rocío González-Sánchez & Maria Sonia Medina-Salgado & Davide Settembre-Blundo, 2021. "E-Commerce Calls for Cyber-Security and Sustainability: How European Citizens Look for a Trusted Online Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-17, June.
    13. Vito Fragnelli & Ewa Kiryluk-Dryjska, 2019. "Rationing methods for allocating the European Union’s rural development funds in Poland," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 36(1), pages 295-322, April.
    14. Martínez, Ricardo & Moreno-Ternero, Juan D., 2022. "Compensation and sacrifice in the probabilistic rationing of indivisible units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(2), pages 740-751.
    15. Ershad Oftadeh & Mojtaba Shourian & Bahram Saghafian, 2016. "Evaluation of the Bankruptcy Approach for Water Resources Allocation Conflict Resolution at Basin Scale, Iran’s Lake Urmia Experience," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(10), pages 3519-3533, August.
    16. Balbina Casas-Mendez & Vito Fragnelli & Ignacio Garcìa-Jurado, 2014. "A survey of allocation rules for the museum pass problem," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 38(2), pages 191-205, May.
    17. Omar Sharaf-addeen Alansary & Tareq Al-Ansari, 2023. "Developing a Strategic Sustainability Assessment Methodology for Free Zones Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-28, June.
    18. Zhipeng Fan & Xiang Fu & Xiaodan Zhao, 2024. "A Bargaining with Negotiation Cost for Water Use and Pollution Conflict Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-22, December.
    19. Jianan Qin & Xiang Fu & Shaoming Peng & Yuni Xu & Jie Huang & Sha Huang, 2019. "Asymmetric Bargaining Model for Water Resource Allocation over Transboundary Rivers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-23, May.
    20. Fatemeh Babaei & Hamidreza Navidi & Stefano Moretti, 2022. "A bankruptcy approach to solve the fixed cost allocation problem in transport systems," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 30(2), pages 332-358, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:waterr:v:39:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1007_s11269-024-04078-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.