IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/telsys/v68y2018i3d10.1007_s11235-017-0401-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution for solving complex situations in multi-criteria optimization of the tracking channels of GPS baseband telecommunication receivers

Author

Listed:
  • F. M. Jumaah

    (University Putra Malaysia)

  • A. A. Zaidan

    (Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris)

  • B. B. Zaidan

    (Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris)

  • R. Bahbibi

    (Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris)

  • M. Y. Qahtan

    (Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris)

  • A. Sali

    (University Putra Malaysia)

Abstract

Global positioning system (GPS) has undergone intensive development, starting as an advanced specialized tool to a general-purpose gadget used in our daily lives. GPS exists in new technologies, applications, and consumer products, especially in smartphones and tablets. In a GPS receiver design, power consumption and localization accuracy are critical factors that affect the outcome of a GPS receiver system. Theoretically, increasing the number of required tracking channels in a GPS baseband receiver increases the design complexity and size of this system. Thus, power consumption can significantly increase. The receiver should acquire and track numerous satellites to improve the location accuracy of a position, thereby indicating that the receiver requires a high number of tracking channels. Thus, optimizing these tracking channels to balance the conflict among performance parameters is a difficult and challenging task. This paper presents a technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) for solving complex situations for multi-criteria optimization of the tracking channels of GPS baseband telecommunication receiver. Nine operation modes of GPS receiver were evaluated by each design parameter, such as power consumption, localization accuracy, and time with no position available for static and dynamic positioning. Then, the TOPSIS was utilized and implemented to measure and rank the overall performance of tracking channel selection. Results of this study indicate that (1) multi-objective optimization is a reliable strategy for visualizing the trade-off among the GPS design parameters and providing a dynamic power consumption planning. (2) The best aggregated performance of the GPS receiver occurs when the number of tracking channels equals five and six for static and dynamic positioning, respectively. (3) The most frequent number of available satellites is eight, whereas the other number of satellites is a rare case to acquire. However, GPS standards require that available GPS satellites are constantly 12 at any time and place.

Suggested Citation

  • F. M. Jumaah & A. A. Zaidan & B. B. Zaidan & R. Bahbibi & M. Y. Qahtan & A. Sali, 2018. "Technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution for solving complex situations in multi-criteria optimization of the tracking channels of GPS baseband telecommunication receivers," Telecommunication Systems: Modelling, Analysis, Design and Management, Springer, vol. 68(3), pages 425-443, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:telsys:v:68:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s11235-017-0401-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s11235-017-0401-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11235-017-0401-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11235-017-0401-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. O. H. Salman & A. A. Zaidan & B. B. Zaidan & Naserkalid & M. Hashim, 2017. "Novel Methodology for Triage and Prioritizing Using “Big Data” Patients with Chronic Heart Diseases Through Telemedicine Environmental," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(05), pages 1211-1245, September.
    2. Chou, Shuo-Yan & Chang, Yao-Hui & Shen, Chun-Ying, 2008. "A fuzzy simple additive weighting system under group decision-making for facility location selection with objective/subjective attributes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(1), pages 132-145, August.
    3. M. R. Ahsan & M. T. Islam & M. Habib Ullah & M. F. Mansor & N. Misran, 2016. "Dual band printed patch antenna on ceramic–polytetrafluoroethylene composite material substrate for GPS and WLAN applications," Telecommunication Systems: Modelling, Analysis, Design and Management, Springer, vol. 62(4), pages 747-756, August.
    4. Opricovic, Serafim & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2004. "Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(2), pages 445-455, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Z. K. Mohammed & A. A. Zaidan & H. B. Aris & Hassan A. Alsattar & Sarah Qahtan & Muhammet Deveci & Dursun Delen, 2024. "Bitcoin network-based anonymity and privacy model for metaverse implementation in Industry 5.0 using linear Diophantine fuzzy sets," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 342(2), pages 1193-1233, November.
    2. Albahri, A.S. & Alnoor, Alhamzah & Zaidan, A.A. & Albahri, O.S. & Hameed, Hamsa & Zaidan, B.B. & Peh, S.S. & Zain, A.B. & Siraj, S.B. & Alamoodi, A.H. & Yass, A.A., 2021. "Based on the multi-assessment model: Towards a new context of combining the artificial neural network and structural equation modelling: A review," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 153(P1).
    3. Mohammed Talal & A. A. Zaidan & B. B. Zaidan & O. S. Albahri & M. A. Alsalem & A. S. Albahri & A. H. Alamoodi & M. L. M. Kiah & F. M. Jumaah & Mussab Alaa, 2019. "Comprehensive review and analysis of anti-malware apps for smartphones," Telecommunication Systems: Modelling, Analysis, Design and Management, Springer, vol. 72(2), pages 285-337, October.
    4. Mahmood M. Salih & O. S. Albahri & A. A. Zaidan & B. B. Zaidan & F. M. Jumaah & A. S. Albahri, 2021. "Benchmarking of AQM methods of network congestion control based on extension of interval type-2 trapezoidal fuzzy decision by opinion score method," Telecommunication Systems: Modelling, Analysis, Design and Management, Springer, vol. 77(3), pages 493-522, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barak, Sasan & Dahooei, Jalil Heidary, 2018. "A novel hybrid fuzzy DEA-Fuzzy MADM method for airlines safety evaluation," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 134-149.
    2. S. Meysam Mousavi & Fariborz Jolai & Reza Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, 2013. "A Fuzzy Stochastic Multi-Attribute Group Decision-Making Approach for Selection Problems," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 207-233, March.
    3. repec:plo:pone00:0217786 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Nastaran Chitsaz & Mohammad Banihabib, 2015. "Comparison of Different Multi Criteria Decision-Making Models in Prioritizing Flood Management Alternatives," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(8), pages 2503-2525, June.
    5. Heidary Dahooie, Jalil & Qorbani, Ali Reza & Daim, Tugrul, 2021. "Providing a framework for selecting the appropriate method of technology acquisition considering uncertainty in hierarchical group decision-making: Case Study: Interactive television technology," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    6. Yi Peng, 2015. "Regional earthquake vulnerability assessment using a combination of MCDM methods," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 234(1), pages 95-110, November.
    7. Zheng, Guozhong & Wang, Xiao, 2020. "The comprehensive evaluation of renewable energy system schemes in tourist resorts based on VIKOR method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    8. Milad Zamanifar & Seyed Mohammad Seyedhoseyni, 2017. "Recovery planning model for roadways network after natural hazards," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 87(2), pages 699-716, June.
    9. Pedro Ponce & Citlaly Pérez & Aminah Robinson Fayek & Arturo Molina, 2022. "Solar Energy Implementation in Manufacturing Industry Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Fuzzy TOPSIS and S4 Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-19, November.
    10. Wenyao Niu & Yuan Rong & Liying Yu & Lu Huang, 2022. "A Novel Hybrid Group Decision Making Approach Based on EDAS and Regret Theory under a Fermatean Cubic Fuzzy Environment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(17), pages 1-30, August.
    11. Wabukala, Benard M. & Bergland, Olvar & Mukisa, Nicholas & Adaramola, Muyiwa S. & Watundu, Susan & Orobia, Laura A. & Rudaheranwa, Nichodemus, 2024. "Electricity security in Uganda: Measurement and policy priorities," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    12. Wei, Sen & Yang, Hanqing & Bai, Yu & Wang, Yuanqing, 2025. "Road safety assessment of small management units considering smart roadway retrofitting," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 28-41.
    13. Hisham Alidrisi, 2021. "An Innovative Job Evaluation Approach Using the VIKOR Algorithm," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-19, June.
    14. Abbas Keramati & Fatemeh Shapouri, 2016. "Multidimensional appraisal of customer relationship management: integrating balanced scorecard and multi criteria decision making approaches," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 217-251, May.
    15. Serafim Opricovic, 2009. "A Compromise Solution in Water Resources Planning," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 23(8), pages 1549-1561, June.
    16. María Pilar de la Cruz López & Juan José Cartelle Barros & Alfredo del Caño Gochi & Manuel Lara Coira, 2021. "New Approach for Managing Sustainability in Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-27, June.
    17. Zheng Yuan & Baohua Wen & Cheng He & Jin Zhou & Zhonghua Zhou & Feng Xu, 2022. "Application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Analysis to Rural Spatial Sustainability Evaluation: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-31, May.
    18. Khaled Alshehri & Mohadese Basirati & Devin Sapsford & Michael Harbottle & Peter Cleall, 2024. "Nature-Based Secondary Resource Recovery under Climate Change Uncertainty: A Robust Multi-Objective Optimisation Methodology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-27, August.
    19. Lupo, Toni, 2015. "Fuzzy ServPerf model combined with ELECTRE III to comparatively evaluate service quality of international airports in Sicily," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 249-259.
    20. Jing Zhang & Xinglong Feng & Aixiang Wu & Haiyong Cheng & Zhengrong Li & Shaoyong Wang & Wei Sun & Chong Chen, 2025. "Critical early warning of underground debris flows in mines based on rainfall–collapse characteristics," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(1), pages 423-445, January.
    21. Alamoodi, A.H. & Zaidan, B.B. & Zaidan, A.A. & Albahri, O.S. & Chen, Juliana & Chyad, M.A. & Garfan, Salem & Aleesa, A.M., 2021. "Machine learning-based imputation soft computing approach for large missing scale and non-reference data imputation," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:telsys:v:68:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s11235-017-0401-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.