IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/stmapp/v28y2019i4d10.1007_s10260-019-00451-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimation of the volume under the ROC surface in presence of nonignorable verification bias

Author

Listed:
  • Khanh To Duc

    (University of Padova)

  • Monica Chiogna

    (University of Bologna)

  • Gianfranco Adimari

    (University of Padova)

Abstract

The volume under the receiver operating characteristic surface (VUS) is useful for measuring the overall accuracy of a diagnostic test when the possible disease status belongs to one of three ordered categories. In medical studies, the VUS of a new test is typically estimated through a sample of measurements obtained by some suitable sample of patients. However, in many cases, only a subset of such patients has the true disease status assessed by a gold standard test. In this paper, for a continuous-scale diagnostic test, we propose four estimators of the VUS which accommodate for nonignorable missingness of the disease status. The estimators are based on a parametric model which jointly describes both the disease and the verification process. Identifiability of the model is discussed. Consistency and asymptotic normality of the proposed estimators are shown, and variance estimation is discussed. The finite-sample behavior is investigated by means of simulation experiments. An illustration is provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Khanh To Duc & Monica Chiogna & Gianfranco Adimari, 2019. "Estimation of the volume under the ROC surface in presence of nonignorable verification bias," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 28(4), pages 695-722, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:stmapp:v:28:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s10260-019-00451-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10260-019-00451-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10260-019-00451-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10260-019-00451-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rotnitzky, Andrea & Faraggi, David & Schisterman, Enrique, 2006. "Doubly Robust Estimation of the Area Under the Receiver-Operating Characteristic Curve in the Presence of Verification Bias," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 101, pages 1276-1288, September.
    2. Xiao-Hua Zhou & Pete Castelluccio, 2004. "Adjusting for Non-Ignorable Verification Bias in Clinical Studies for Alzheimer's Disease," UW Biostatistics Working Paper Series 1044, Berkeley Electronic Press.
    3. Danping Liu & Xiao-Hua Zhou, 2010. "A Model for Adjusting for Nonignorable Verification Bias in Estimation of the ROC Curve and Its Area with Likelihood-Based Approach," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(4), pages 1119-1128, December.
    4. Vaart,A. W. van der, 2000. "Asymptotic Statistics," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521784504, June.
    5. repec:bla:jorssc:v:57:y:2008:i:1:p:1-23 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Kang, Le & Tian, Lili, 2013. "Estimation of the volume under the ROC surface with three ordinal diagnostic categories," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 39-51.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chinyereugo M Umemneku Chikere & Kevin Wilson & Sara Graziadio & Luke Vale & A Joy Allen, 2019. "Diagnostic test evaluation methodology: A systematic review of methods employed to evaluate diagnostic tests in the absence of gold standard – An update," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-25, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Danping Liu & Xiao-Hua Zhou, 2013. "Covariate Adjustment in Estimating the Area Under ROC Curve with Partially Missing Gold Standard," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(1), pages 91-100, March.
    2. Danping Liu & Xiao-Hua Zhou, 2011. "Semiparametric Estimation of the Covariate-Specific ROC Curve in Presence of Ignorable Verification Bias," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(3), pages 906-916, September.
    3. Adimari Gianfranco & Chiogna Monica, 2015. "Nearest-Neighbor Estimation for ROC Analysis under Verification Bias," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 109-124, May.
    4. Kasy, Maximilian, 2011. "A nonparametric test for path dependence in discrete panel data," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 172-175.
    5. Atı̇la Abdulkadı̇roğlu & Joshua D. Angrist & Yusuke Narita & Parag Pathak, 2022. "Breaking Ties: Regression Discontinuity Design Meets Market Design," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 90(1), pages 117-151, January.
    6. Arai, Yoichi & Otsu, Taisuke & Xu, Mengshan, 2024. "GLS under monotone heteroskedasticity," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 246(1).
    7. Ashesh Rambachan & Jonathan Roth, 2020. "Design-Based Uncertainty for Quasi-Experiments," Papers 2008.00602, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2024.
    8. Higgins, Ayden & Jochmans, Koen, 2025. "Inference in Dynamic Models for Panel Data Using The Moving Block Bootstrap," TSE Working Papers 25-1620, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    9. Debashis Ghosh, 2004. "Semiparametric methods for the binormal model with multiple biomarkers," The University of Michigan Department of Biostatistics Working Paper Series 1046, Berkeley Electronic Press.
    10. Brian D. Williamson & Peter B. Gilbert & Marco Carone & Noah Simon, 2021. "Nonparametric variable importance assessment using machine learning techniques," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 77(1), pages 9-22, March.
    11. Arie Beresteanu & Francesca Molinari, 2008. "Asymptotic Properties for a Class of Partially Identified Models," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 76(4), pages 763-814, July.
    12. Coolen-Maturi, Tahani & Elkhafifi, Faiza F. & Coolen, Frank P.A., 2014. "Three-group ROC analysis: A nonparametric predictive approach," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 69-81.
    13. Laurent Davezies & Xavier D'Haultfoeuille & Yannick Guyonvarch, 2018. "Asymptotic results under multiway clustering," Papers 1807.07925, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2018.
    14. Dominic Edelmann & Tobias Terzer & Donald Richards, 2021. "A Basic Treatment of the Distance Covariance," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 83(1), pages 12-25, May.
    15. A Stefano Caria & Grant Gordon & Maximilian Kasy & Simon Quinn & Soha Osman Shami & Alexander Teytelboym, 2024. "An Adaptive Targeted Field Experiment: Job Search Assistance for Refugees in Jordan," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 22(2), pages 781-836.
    16. Clément de Chaisemartin & Xavier D'Haultfœuille, 2020. "Two-Way Fixed Effects Estimators with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 110(9), pages 2964-2996, September.
    17. Abe, Toshihiro & Miyata, Yoichi & Shiohama, Takayuki, 2023. "Bayesian estimation for mode and anti-mode preserving circular distributions," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 136-160.
    18. Bryan S. Graham, 2017. "An econometric model of network formation with degree heterogeneity," CeMMAP working papers 08/17, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    19. Matias D. Cattaneo & Richard K. Crump & Weining Wang, 2022. "Beta-Sorted Portfolios," Papers 2208.10974, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2024.
    20. Benoumechiara Nazih & Bousquet Nicolas & Michel Bertrand & Saint-Pierre Philippe, 2020. "Detecting and modeling critical dependence structures between random inputs of computer models," Dependence Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 263-297, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stmapp:v:28:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s10260-019-00451-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.