IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ssefpa/v17y2025i4d10.1007_s12571-025-01558-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From external shocks to internal propagation within agri-food systems: a socio-metabolic perspective of the animal sector on an isolated tropical island

Author

Listed:
  • Elisa Hittner Sánchez

    (INRAE, Institut Agro)

  • Sophie Madelrieux

    (INRAE, Institut Agro
    Université Grenoble Alpes, INRAE, LESSEM)

  • Jonathan Vayssières

    (CIRAD)

  • Thomas Nesme

    (INRAE)

Abstract

Insular agri-food systems face significant challenges due to their exposure to external shocks via trade dependencies, geographic isolation, and constrained land and natural resources. This study proposes a novel socio-metabolic analytical framework and applies it to investigate how external shocks propagate within the animal product supply systems (APSS) of La Reunion Island, a French overseas department. By conceptualizing APSS as a metabolic network, we analyze characteristics that influence three vulnerability factors: exposure, sensitivity, and incapacity to cope. To analyze shock propagation dynamics, this paper introduces the distinction between cascading and domino effects: cascading effects trace the sectors and stages impacted, while domino effects highlight how the nature of disruptions evolves as they spread. Using a mixed-methods approach, we map flow dynamics and identify critical interaction nodes susceptible to convey shock propagation clusters. Drawing on stakeholder insights, our empirical findings from disruptions during the COVID-19 pandemic, the Russo-Ukrainian war, and other events reveal the interplay of different cascading and domino effects influencing the availability, accessibility and stability of animal-based products. Our findings underscore a paradox: while import-dependent local APSS are highly exposed and present vulnerabilities to external shocks, they also buffer impacts on the food supply by ensuring some degree of autonomy. The results offer insights into the systemic vulnerabilities of insular agri-food systems and provide a framework for analyzing shock propagation in complex food supply networks.

Suggested Citation

  • Elisa Hittner Sánchez & Sophie Madelrieux & Jonathan Vayssières & Thomas Nesme, 2025. "From external shocks to internal propagation within agri-food systems: a socio-metabolic perspective of the animal sector on an isolated tropical island," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 17(4), pages 829-844, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:ssefpa:v:17:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s12571-025-01558-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s12571-025-01558-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12571-025-01558-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12571-025-01558-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giulia Borghesi & Piergiuseppe Morone, 2023. "A review of the effects of COVID-19 on food waste," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 15(1), pages 261-280, February.
    2. Martinez-Alier, Joan & Munda, Giuseppe & O'Neill, John, 1998. "Weak comparability of values as a foundation for ecological economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 277-286, September.
    3. Moritz Laber & Peter Klimek & Martin Bruckner & Liuhuaying Yang & Stefan Thurner, 2022. "Shock propagation from the Russia-Ukraine conflict on international multilayer food production network determines global food availability," Papers 2210.01846, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2023.
    4. Dirk Helbing, 2013. "Globally networked risks and how to respond," Nature, Nature, vol. 497(7447), pages 51-59, May.
    5. Juan Jesús Larrabeiti-Rodríguez & Raúl Velasco-Fernández, 2022. "Multi-scale integrated analysis of societal and ecosystem metabolism (MuSIASEM) revisited: synthesizing and updating the theoretical foundations," Revista de Economia Critica, Universidad Pablo de Olavide y Asociacion de Economia Critica, vol. 34, pages 44-68.
    6. Vlajic, Jelena V. & van der Vorst, Jack G.A.J. & Haijema, René, 2012. "A framework for designing robust food supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(1), pages 176-189.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Weidong Lin & Jose Olmo & Abderrahim Taamouti, 2025. "Portfolio Selection under Systemic Risk," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 57(4), pages 905-949, June.
    2. Hao Xu & Niu Niu & Dongmei Li & Chengjie Wang, 2024. "A Dynamic Evolutionary Analysis of the Vulnerability of Global Food Trade Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Igor Linkov & Benjamin Trump & Greg Kiker, 2022. "Diversity and inclusiveness are necessary components of resilient international teams," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-5, December.
    4. Shuang Liu & Kirsten Maclean & Cathy Robinson, 2019. "A cost-effective framework to prioritise stakeholder participation options," EURO Journal on Decision Processes, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 7(3), pages 221-241, November.
    5. repec:plo:pone00:0090265 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Ramos-Martin, Jesus, 2003. "Empiricism in ecological economics: a perspective from complex systems theory," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 387-398, October.
    7. Balint, T. & Lamperti, F. & Mandel, A. & Napoletano, M. & Roventini, A. & Sapio, A., 2017. "Complexity and the Economics of Climate Change: A Survey and a Look Forward," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 252-265.
    8. Man Li & Tao Ye & Peijun Shi & Jian Fang, 2015. "Impacts of the global economic crisis and Tohoku earthquake on Sino–Japan trade: a comparative perspective," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 75(1), pages 541-556, January.
    9. Laura M. Canevari‐Luzardo & Frans Berkhout & Mark Pelling, 2020. "A relational view of climate adaptation in the private sector: How do value chain interactions shape business perceptions of climate risk and adaptive behaviours?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 432-444, February.
    10. Qiu, Ruozhen & Sun, Minghe & Lim, Yun Fong, 2017. "Optimizing (s, S) policies for multi-period inventory models with demand distribution uncertainty: Robust dynamic programing approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(3), pages 880-892.
    11. Ellinas, Christos & Allan, Neil & Johansson, Anders, 2016. "Project systemic risk: Application examples of a network model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 50-62.
    12. J. Ram Pillarisetti & Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh, 2008. "Sustainable Nations: What do Aggregate Indicators tell us?," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 08-012/3, Tinbergen Institute.
    13. Tubridy, Fiadh & Lennon, Mick & Scott, Mark, 2022. "Managed retreat and coastal climate change adaptation: The environmental justice implications and value of a coproduction approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    14. Kosoy, Nicolás & Corbera, Esteve, 2010. "Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(6), pages 1228-1236, April.
    15. Rota, Cosimo & Zanasi, Cesare & Reynolds, Nikolai, 2014. "Assessing the Supply Chain Governance Scenario in the Agri-food Sector: Development of a Measurement Tool," 2014 International European Forum, February 17-21, 2014, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 199341, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    16. Spash, Clive L. & Vatn, Arild, 2006. "Transferring environmental value estimates: Issues and alternatives," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(2), pages 379-388, December.
    17. David Raba & Rafael D. Tordecilla & Pedro Copado & Angel A. Juan & Daniel Mount, 2022. "A Digital Twin for Decision Making on Livestock Feeding," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 52(3), pages 267-282, May.
    18. Martin Hensher & Gerry McCartney & Eleanor Ochodo, 2024. "Health Economics in a World of Uneconomic Growth," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 427-433, July.
    19. Palola, Pirta & Bailey, Richard & Wedding, Lisa, 2022. "A novel framework to operationalise value-pluralism in environmental valuation: Environmental value functions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    20. Takayuki Mizuno & Takaaki Ohnishi & Tsutomu Watanabe, 2015. "Structure of global buyer-supplier networks and its implications for conflict minerals regulations," Papers 1505.02274, arXiv.org.
    21. George Van Voorn & Geerten Hengeveld & Jan Verhagen, 2020. "An agent based model representation to assess resilience and efficiency of food supply chains," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-27, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ssefpa:v:17:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s12571-025-01558-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.