IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/soinre/v117y2014i2p489-504.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Desirability Bias in Self-reports of Physical Activity: Is an Exercise Identity the Culprit?

Author

Listed:
  • Philip Brenner
  • John DeLamater

Abstract

Like that of other normative behaviors, much of the research on physical exercise is based on self-reports that are prone to overreporting. While research has focused on identifying the presence and degree of overreporting, this paper fills an important gap by investigating its causes. The explanation based in impression management will be challenged, using an explanation based in identity theory as an arguably better fitting alternative. Respondents were randomly assigned to one of two conditions: (1) a web instrument using direct survey questions, or (2) a chronological reporting procedure using text messaging. Comparisons to validation data from a reverse record check indicate significantly greater rates of overreporting in the web condition than in the text condition. Results suggest that measurement bias is associated with the importance of the respondents’ exercise identity, prompted by the directness of the conventional survey question. Findings call into question the benefit of self-administration for bias reduction in measurement of normative behaviors. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Suggested Citation

  • Philip Brenner & John DeLamater, 2014. "Social Desirability Bias in Self-reports of Physical Activity: Is an Exercise Identity the Culprit?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 117(2), pages 489-504, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:117:y:2014:i:2:p:489-504
    DOI: 10.1007/s11205-013-0359-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11205-013-0359-y
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11205-013-0359-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Iiris Niemi, 1993. "Systematic error in behavioural measurement: Comparing results from interview and time budget studies," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 229-244, November.
    2. Philip S. Brenner & John D. DeLamater, 2013. "Paradata correlates of data quality in an SMS time use study – Evidence from a validation study," electronic International Journal of Time Use Research, Research Institute on Professions (Forschungsinstitut Freie Berufe (FFB)) and The International Association for Time Use Research (IATUR), vol. 10(1), pages 38-54, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Philip S. Brenner, 2017. "Narratives of Response Error From Cognitive Interviews of Survey Questions About Normative Behavior," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 46(3), pages 540-564, August.
    2. Xin Lin & Maggie Yu & George A. Jelinek & Steve Simpson-Yap & Sandra Neate & Nupur Nag, 2020. "Greater Engagement with Health Information Is Associated with Adoption and Maintenance of Healthy Lifestyle Behaviours in People with MS," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Marta Palczyńska & Maja Rynko, 2021. "ICT skills measurement in social surveys: Can we trust self-reports?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 917-943, June.
    4. Philip S. Brenner & John DeLamater, 2016. "Measurement Directiveness as a Cause of Response Bias," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 45(2), pages 348-371, May.
    5. Sofia Amaral & Lelys Dinarte-Diaz & Patricio Dominguez & Steffanny Romero & Santiago M. Perez-Vincent, 2022. "Talk or Text? Evaluating Response Rates by Remote Survey Method during Covid-19," CESifo Working Paper Series 9517, CESifo.
    6. Suzanne J. Carroll & Theo Niyonsenga & Neil T. Coffee & Anne W. Taylor & Mark Daniel, 2017. "Does Physical Activity Mediate the Associations Between Local-Area Descriptive Norms, Built Environment Walkability, and Glycosylated Hemoglobin?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, August.
    7. Pedro Jesús Ruiz-Montero & Oscar Chiva-Bartoll & Antonio Baena-Extremera & David Hortigüela-Alcalá, 2020. "Gender, Physical Self-Perception and Overall Physical Fitness in Secondary School Students: A Multiple Mediation Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-14, September.
    8. Conor Philpott & Brian Donovan & Sarahjane Belton & Diarmuid Lester & Michael Duncan & Fiona Chambers & Wesley O’Brien, 2020. "Investigating the Age-Related Association between Perceived Motor Competence and Actual Motor Competence in Adolescence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-18, September.
    9. Clara R. Warmath & Courtney C. Choy & Elizabeth A. Frame & Lauren B. Sherar & Rachel L. Duckham & Christina Soti-Ulberg & Take Naseri & Muagututia S. Reupena & Nicola L. Hawley, 2021. "Comparability of The Netherlands Physical Activity Questionnaire with Accelerometer-Measured Physical Activity in Samoan Children: A Retrospective Analysis of Ola Tuputupua’e Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-14, August.
    10. Eydie N. Kramer & Christine A. Chard & Kellie Walters & Daheia J. Barr-Anderson, 2018. "Weight-Dependent Disparities in Adolescent Girls: The Impact of a Brief Pilot Intervention on Exercise and Healthy Eater Identity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-16, July.
    11. I-Hua Chu & Yu-Ling Chen & Pei-Tzu Wu & Wen-Lan Wu & Lan-Yuen Guo, 2021. "The Associations between Self-Determined Motivation, Multidimensional Self-Efficacy, and Device-Measured Physical Activity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-11, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yee Kan, Â Man & Gershuny, Jonathan, 2006. "Infusing time diary evidence into panel data: an exercise in calibrating time-use estimates for the BHPS," ISER Working Paper Series 2006-19, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    2. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/5j2m1g6i7j8pnapkjvifl6e30f is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Merz, Joachim, 2009. "Time Use and Time Budgets – Improvements, Future Challenges and Recommendations," MPRA Paper 16304, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Alireza Nili & Mary Tate & David Johnstone, 2019. "The process of solving problems with self-service technologies: a study from the user’s perspective," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 373-407, June.
    5. Winter, James C. & Darmstadt, Gary L. & Davis, Jennifer, 2021. "The role of piped water supplies in advancing health, economic development, and gender equality in rural communities," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    6. Costa-Font, Joan & Fleche, Sarah & Pagan, Ricardo, 2024. "The labour market returns to sleep," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    7. Körner Thomas & Wolff Loup, 2016. "“Do the Germans Really Work Six Weeks More than the French?” – Measuring Working Time with the Labour Force Survey in France and Germany," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 32(2), pages 405-431, June.
    8. Yee Kan, Â Man, 2006. "Measuring housework participation: the gap between ‘stylised’ questionnaire estimates and diary-based estimates," ISER Working Paper Series 2006-11, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    9. Pierre Walthery & Jonathan Gershuny, 2019. "Improving Stylised Working Time Estimates with Time Diary Data: A Multi Study Assessment for the UK," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 144(3), pages 1303-1321, August.
    10. Man Kan, 2008. "Measuring Housework Participation: The Gap between “Stylised” Questionnaire Estimates and Diary-based Estimates," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 86(3), pages 381-400, May.
    11. Ragni Kitterød, 2001. "Does the recording of parallel activities in Time Use Diaries affect the way people report their main activities?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 145-178, November.
    12. Philip S. Brenner & John DeLamater, 2016. "Measurement Directiveness as a Cause of Response Bias," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 45(2), pages 348-371, May.
    13. Michael Kevane & Leslie Gray, 1999. "A Woman's Field Is Made At Night: Gendered Land Rights And Norms In Burkina Faso," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(3), pages 1-26.
    14. Michael Bittman & Paula England & Nancy Folbre & George Matheson, 2001. "When Gender Trumps Money: Bargaining and Time in Household Work," JCPR Working Papers 221, Northwestern University/University of Chicago Joint Center for Poverty Research.
    15. Simon Bittmann, 2015. "Ressources économiques des femmes et travail domestique des conjoints : quels effets pour quelles tâches ?," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-01309219, HAL.
    16. Christina Boll & Julian Leppin & Nora Reich, 2014. "Paternal childcare and parental leave policies: evidence from industrialized countries," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 129-158, March.
    17. Joachim Merz, 2009. "Zeitverwendungsforschung und Mediennutzung," FFB-Discussionpaper 76, Research Institute on Professions (Forschungsinstitut Freie Berufe (FFB)), LEUPHANA University Lüneburg.
    18. Petra Klumb & Meinrad Perrez, 2004. "Why Time-Sampling Studies Can Enrich Work–Leisure Research," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 67(1), pages 1-10, June.
    19. Marta Palczyńska & Maja Rynko, 2021. "ICT skills measurement in social surveys: Can we trust self-reports?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 917-943, June.
    20. Auspurg, Katrin & Iacovou, Maria & Nicoletti, Cheti, 2014. "Housework Share between Partners: Experimental Evidence on Gender Identity," IZA Discussion Papers 8569, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    21. Simon Bittmann, 2015. "Ressources économiques des femmes et travail domestique des conjoints : quels effets pour quelles tâches ?," Sciences Po publications info:hdl:2441/5j2m1g6i7j8, Sciences Po.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:soinre:v:117:y:2014:i:2:p:489-504. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.