IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/sjobre/v57y2005i1d10.1007_bf03372760.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Kann Teamführung zu intensiv sein?

Author

Listed:
  • Ruth Stock

    (Universität der Bundeswehr Hamburg)

Abstract

Summary In previous research, the importance of team leadership for team performance has been discussed controversely. This article provides deeper insights into the relationship between team leadership and team performance by investigating non-linear effects with respect to this relationship. Based on theory of group interaction we argue that team leadership improves team processes only to a certain degree, whereas an intensity of leadership above a certain level worsens team processes. Hypotheses testing was based on data collected from 225 teams from multiple manufacturing and services industries. Results by means of non-linear regression analysis indicate the presence of a number of non-linear effects with respect to the links under consideration.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruth Stock, 2005. "Kann Teamführung zu intensiv sein?," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 33-52, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:57:y:2005:i:1:d:10.1007_bf03372760
    DOI: 10.1007/BF03372760
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF03372760
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF03372760?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stock, Ruth, 2004. "Drivers of Team Performance: What Do We Know and What Have We Still to Learn?," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 35551, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    2. Stock, Ruth, 2004. "Drivers of Team Performance: What Do We Know and What Have We Still to Learn?," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 60487, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    3. Ruth Stock, 2004. "Drivers Of Team Performance: What Do We Know And What Have We Still To Learn?," Schmalenbach Business Review (sbr), LMU Munich School of Management, vol. 56(3), pages 274-306, July.
    4. Mary Beth Pinto & Jeffrey K. Pinto & John E. Prescott, 1993. "Antecedents and Consequences of Project Team Cross-Functional Cooperation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(10), pages 1281-1297, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Gaitanides & Ruth Stock, 2004. "Interorganisationale Teams: Transaktionskostentheoretische Überlegungen und empirische Befunde zum Teamerfolg," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 56(5), pages 436-451, August.
    2. Mamatzakis, Emmanuel & Xu, Bingrun, 2016. "Managerial attributes and equity mutual fund performance: evidence from china," MPRA Paper 76139, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Yanqing Wang & Zheng Zong, 2019. "Why Students Have Conflicts in Peer Assessment? An Empirical Study of an Online Peer Assessment Community," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-14, November.
    4. Janhonen, Minna & Johanson, Jan-Erik, 2011. "Role of knowledge conversion and social networks in team performance," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 217-225.
    5. Karagiannidis, Iordanis, 2010. "Management team structure and mutual fund performance," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 197-211, April.
    6. Timothy J. CRADER & Stephen M. BROWN, 2013. "Team Selling And Customer Satisfaction In The Mission Critical Sector: A Case Study Of Eyp Mission Critical Facilities Inc," Management and Marketing Journal, University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 0(2), pages 248-254, November.
    7. Hao Shi, 2006. "L'évolution du "calcul économique en équipe" : un processus de légitimation des changements institutionnels en Chine," Working Papers 2006-4, Laboratoire Orléanais de Gestion - université d'Orléans.
    8. Uschi Backes-Gellner & Stephan Veen, 2008. "The Impact of Workforce Age Heterogeneity on Company Productivity," Working Papers 0078, University of Zurich, Institute for Strategy and Business Economics (ISU), revised Sep 2009.
    9. Andrea Lippi, 2016. "Does the Asset Manager's Nationality Influence the Occupational Pension Fund Performance?," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 6(2), pages 176-196, December.
    10. Nicoletti, Sergio & Nicolo, Fabio, 1998. "A concurrent engineering decision model: Management of the project activities information flows," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 115-127, January.
    11. Isaac Zúñiga Aguilar, 2022. "Neuroeconomics in Cooperatives: Hierarchy of Emotional Patterns in the Collective Decision-Making Process for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-31, June.
    12. Shoeb Ahmed Memon & Steve Rowlinson & Riza Yosia Sunindijo & Hafiz Zahoor, 2021. "Collaborative Behavior in Relational Contracting Projects in Hong Kong—A Contractor’s Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, May.
    13. Goh, Shao Hung & Eldridge, Stephen, 2019. "Sales and Operations Planning: The effect of coordination mechanisms on supply chain performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 80-94.
    14. Haberstroh, Martin & Wolf, Joachim, 2005. "Individuelle Autonomie in Projektteams," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 585, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    15. Bremmers, Harry J. & Sabidussi, Anna, 2009. "Co-innovation: what are the success factors?," APSTRACT: Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce, AGRIMBA, vol. 3(1-2), pages 1-8.
    16. Mu-Jung Huang & Kuo-Chih Cheng & Shao-Hsi Chung & Huo-Ming Wang & Kuo-Hua Wang, 2021. "Budget Participation Capacity Configuration (BPCC), Budgeting Participation Requirement and Product Innovation Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-12, May.
    17. Rupak Rauniar & Greg Rawski & Donald Hudson, 2017. "Antecedents And Consequences Of Ippd Effectiveness," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(07), pages 1-38, October.
    18. Blazevic, V. & Lievens, A., 2003. "Learning during the new financial service innovation process: antecedents and performance effects," Research Memorandum 023, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    19. Haiyang Li & John B. Bingham & Elizabeth E. Umphress, 2007. "Fairness from the Top: Perceived Procedural Justice and Collaborative Problem Solving in New Product Development," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(2), pages 200-216, April.
    20. Gomes, Jorge F. & Weerd-Nederhof, Petra C. de & Pearson, Alan W. & Miguel Pina e Cunha, 2000. "Is more always better? An exploration of the differential effects of functional integration on performance in new product development," Nova SBE Working Paper Series wp393, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Nova School of Business and Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    M10; M50; M54;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General
    • M50 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Personnel Economics - - - General
    • M54 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Personnel Economics - - - Labor Management

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:57:y:2005:i:1:d:10.1007_bf03372760. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.