IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v130y2025i5d10.1007_s11192-025-05330-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unsuccessful research funding applications: a scoping review of causes and impacts on Australian researchers and research projects

Author

Listed:
  • Olumide A. Odeyemi

    (Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University
    University of Tasmania)

  • Yvonne Parry

    (Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University
    University College London)

  • Shahid Ullah

    (Flinders University)

  • Nina Sivertsen

    (Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University
    UiT Arctic University of Norway)

Abstract

Research funding plays a significant role in achieving innovative development in health, education, and society. On average only 10–20% of research funding applications in Australia are successful. There is a paucity of studies on the causes and impacts of unsuccessful research funding applications on Australian researchers and research projects. A scoping review of primary studies and grey literature published between 1980 and 2022 from databases such as Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest, PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), OVID, and Google Scholar was conducted. Five studies published between 1992 and 2016 were identified, among which four focused on early career researchers and one focused on female academics. The main themes include causes of unsuccessful research funding applications and the impacts on research projects and Australian researchers. The causes of unsuccessful research funding applications include researchers’ profiles, funding application processes, institutional support, and government involvement. The impacts of unsuccessful research funding applications on Australian researchers include job security, wasted time and effort, and discouragement. The impacts on research projects include abandonment, resubmission to the same or different funding body, and proceeding with the research project. There is a need for further studies on researchers’ coping strategies and the institutional support available to researchers.

Suggested Citation

  • Olumide A. Odeyemi & Yvonne Parry & Shahid Ullah & Nina Sivertsen, 2025. "Unsuccessful research funding applications: a scoping review of causes and impacts on Australian researchers and research projects," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(5), pages 2799-2828, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:130:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s11192-025-05330-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-025-05330-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-025-05330-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-025-05330-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:130:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s11192-025-05330-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.