IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v102y2015i1d10.1007_s11192-014-1443-z.html

Some searches may not work properly. We apologize for the inconvenience.

   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysing the conceptual evolution of qualitative marketing research through science mapping analysis

Author

Listed:
  • E. M. Murgado-Armenteros

    (University of Jaén)

  • M. Gutiérrez-Salcedo

    (University of Jaén)

  • F. J. Torres-Ruiz

    (University of Jaén)

  • M. J. Cobo

    (University of Cádiz)

Abstract

This article examines the conceptual evolution of qualitative research in the field of marketing from 1956 to 2011, identifying the main themes and applications for which it has been used and the trends for the future. Science mapping analysis was employed, using co-word networks in a longitudinal framework. Science mapping analysis differs from other tools in that it includes the use of bibliometric indicators. The great number of studies published makes it possible to undertake a conceptual analysis of how qualitative marketing research has evolved. To show the conceptual evolution of qualitative marketing research, four study periods were chosen. The results made it possible to identify eight thematic areas that employ qualitative research in the field of marketing: Consumer behaviour, Supply chain management, Dynamic capabilities, Methodology, Media, Business to business marketing, International Marketing and Customer Satisfaction.

Suggested Citation

  • E. M. Murgado-Armenteros & M. Gutiérrez-Salcedo & F. J. Torres-Ruiz & M. J. Cobo, 2015. "Analysing the conceptual evolution of qualitative marketing research through science mapping analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(1), pages 519-557, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:102:y:2015:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-014-1443-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-014-1443-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-014-1443-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-014-1443-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. E. C. M. Noyons & H. F. Moed & A. F. J. Raan, 1999. "Integrating research performance analysis and science mapping," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 46(3), pages 591-604, November.
    2. Chang-Ping Hu & Ji-Ming Hu & Sheng-Li Deng & Yong Liu, 2013. "A co-word analysis of library and information science in China," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 97(2), pages 369-382, November.
    3. Judit Bar-Ilan, 2010. "Citations to the “Introduction to informetrics” indexed by WOS, Scopus and Google Scholar," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 82(3), pages 495-506, March.
    4. Christian Sternitzke & Isumo Bergmann, 2009. "Similarity measures for document mapping: A comparative study on the level of an individual scientist," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 78(1), pages 113-130, January.
    5. Hoffman, Donna L & Holbrook, Morris B, 1993. "The Intellectual Structure of Consumer Research: A Bibliometric Study of Author Cocitations in the First 15 Years of the Journal of Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 19(4), pages 505-517, March.
    6. repec:bla:jamist:v:60:y:2009:i:8:p:1635-1651 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Bulent Ozel, 2012. "Individual cognitive structures and collaboration patterns in academia," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 91(2), pages 539-555, May.
    8. Gao-Yong Liu & Ji-Ming Hu & Hui-Ling Wang, 2012. "A co-word analysis of digital library field in China," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 91(1), pages 203-217, April.
    9. Joanna Sale & Lynne Lohfeld & Kevin Brazil, 2002. "Revisiting the Quantitative-Qualitative Debate: Implications for Mixed-Methods Research," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 43-53, February.
    10. M.J. Cobo & A.G. López-Herrera & E. Herrera-Viedma & F. Herrera, 2011. "Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(7), pages 1382-1402, July.
    11. repec:bla:jamest:v:49:y:1998:i:13:p:1206-1223 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Carl Allwood, 2012. "The distinction between qualitative and quantitative research methods is problematic," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 46(5), pages 1417-1429, August.
    13. Robert Stebbins, 1997. "Lifestyle as a generic concept in ethnographic research," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 347-360, November.
    14. Qian-Jin Zong & Hong-Zhou Shen & Qin-Jian Yuan & Xiao-Wei Hu & Zhi-Ping Hou & Shun-Guo Deng, 2013. "Doctoral dissertations of Library and Information Science in China: A co-word analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 94(2), pages 781-799, February.
    15. C. Malesios & S. Psarakis, 2014. "Comparison of the h-index for different fields of research using bootstrap methodology," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 521-545, January.
    16. M.J. Cobo & A.G. López-Herrera & E. Herrera-Viedma & F. Herrera, 2012. "SciMAT: A new science mapping analysis software tool," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(8), pages 1609-1630, August.
    17. Alonso, S. & Cabrerizo, F.J. & Herrera-Viedma, E. & Herrera, F., 2009. "h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 273-289.
    18. van Eck, N.J.P. & Waltman, L., 2007. "Bibliometric Mapping of the Computational Intelligence Field," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2007-027-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    19. Tomas Cahlik, 2000. "Comparison of the Maps of Science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 49(3), pages 373-387, November.
    20. Michael G. Banks, 2006. "An extension of the Hirsch index: Indexing scientific topics and compounds," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 69(1), pages 161-168, October.
    21. Li Tang & Philip Shapira, 2011. "China–US scientific collaboration in nanotechnology: patterns and dynamics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 88(1), pages 1-16, July.
    22. Peters, H. P. F. & van Raan, A. F. J., 1993. "Co-word-based science maps of chemical engineering. Part I: Representations by direct multidimensional scaling," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 23-45, February.
    23. repec:bla:jamest:v:50:y:1999:i:9:p:799-813 is not listed on IDEAS
    24. Cobo, M.J. & López-Herrera, A.G. & Herrera-Viedma, E. & Herrera, F., 2011. "An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 146-166.
    25. van Eck, N.J.P. & Waltman, L., 2009. "How to Normalize Co-Occurrence Data? An Analysis of Some Well-Known Similarity Measures," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2009-001-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    26. Fiorenzo Franceschini & Domenico Maisano, 2012. "Quality & Quantity journal: a bibliometric snapshot," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 573-580, February.
    27. M. A. Martínez & M. Herrera & J. López-Gijón & E. Herrera-Viedma, 2014. "H-Classics: characterizing the concept of citation classics through H-index," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(3), pages 1971-1983, March.
    28. Mu-Hsuan Huang & Chia-Pin Chang, 2014. "Detecting research fronts in OLED field using bibliographic coupling with sliding window," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(3), pages 1721-1744, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cobo, M.J. & López-Herrera, A.G. & Herrera-Viedma, E. & Herrera, F., 2011. "An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 146-166.
    2. Ruben Heradio & David Fernandez-Amoros & Cristina Cerrada & Manuel J. Cobo, 2020. "Group Decision-Making Based on Artificial Intelligence: A Bibliometric Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-20, September.
    3. Nadia Karina Gamboa-Rosales & José María Celaya-Padilla & Ana Luisa Hernandez-Gutierrez & Arturo Moreno-Baez & Carlos E. Galván-Tejada & Jorge I. Galván-Tejada & Edgar González-Fernández & Hamurabi Ga, 2020. "Visualizing the Intellectual Structure and Evolution of Intelligent Transportation Systems: A Systematic Analysis of Research Themes and Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-30, October.
    4. Juntao Zheng & Niancai Liu, 2015. "Mapping of important international academic awards," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 104(3), pages 763-791, September.
    5. Cristina Mele & Jaqueline Pels & Maria Spano & Irene Bernardo, 2023. "Emergent understandings of the market," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2023(1), pages 1-25, March.
    6. Babak Amiri & Ramin Karimianghadim & Navid Yazdanjue & Liaquat Hossain, 2021. "Research topics and trends of the hashtag recommendation domain," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(4), pages 2689-2735, April.
    7. Serhat Burmaoglu & Ozcan Saritas & Levent Bekir Kıdak & İpek Camuz Berber, 2017. "Evolution of connected health: a network perspective," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(3), pages 1419-1438, September.
    8. Gaviria-Marin, Magaly & Merigó, José M. & Baier-Fuentes, Hugo, 2019. "Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 194-220.
    9. Mikel Alayo & Txomin Iturralde & Amaia Maseda & Gloria Aparicio, 2021. "Mapping family firm internationalization research: bibliometric and literature review," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(6), pages 1517-1560, August.
    10. Zamani, Mehdi & Yalcin, Haydar & Naeini, Ali Bonyadi & Zeba, Gordana & Daim, Tugrul U, 2022. "Developing metrics for emerging technologies: identification and assessment," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    11. A. Velez-Estevez & P. García-Sánchez & J. A. Moral-Munoz & M. J. Cobo, 2022. "Why do papers from international collaborations get more citations? A bibliometric analysis of Library and Information Science papers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(12), pages 7517-7555, December.
    12. Veronica Perez-Cabezas & Carmen Ruiz-Molinero & Ines Carmona-Barrientos & Enrique Herrera-Viedma & Manuel J. Cobo & Jose A. Moral-Munoz, 2018. "Highly cited papers in rheumatology: identification and conceptual analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 116(1), pages 555-568, July.
    13. Hugo Baier-Fuentes & José M. Merigó & José Ernesto Amorós & Magaly Gaviria-Marín, 2019. "International entrepreneurship: a bibliometric overview," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 385-429, June.
    14. Shashi & Piera Centobelli & Roberto Cerchione & Amit Mittal, 2021. "Managing sustainability in luxury industry to pursue circular economy strategies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 432-462, January.
    15. Xiaoguang Wang & Qikai Cheng & Wei Lu, 2014. "Analyzing evolution of research topics with NEViewer: a new method based on dynamic co-word networks," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(2), pages 1253-1271, November.
    16. Seyedmohammadreza Hosseini & Hamed Baziyad & Rasoul Norouzi & Sheida Jabbedari Khiabani & Győző Gidófalvi & Amir Albadvi & Abbas Alimohammadi & Seyedehsan Seyedabrishami, 2021. "Mapping the intellectual structure of GIS-T field (2008–2019): a dynamic co-word analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(4), pages 2667-2688, April.
    17. Turgut Karakose & Tijen Tülübaş & Stamatios Papadakis, 2022. "Revealing the Intellectual Structure and Evolution of Digital Addiction Research: An Integrated Bibliometric and Science Mapping Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-27, November.
    18. Jingyuan Yu & Juan Muñoz-Justicia, 2020. "A Bibliometric Overview of Twitter-Related Studies Indexed in Web of Science," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-18, May.
    19. Serhat Burmaoglu & Ozcan Saritas, 2019. "An evolutionary analysis of the innovation policy domain: Is there a paradigm shift?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 118(3), pages 823-847, March.
    20. Cathelijn J. F. Waaijer & Cornelis A. Bochove & Nees Jan Eck, 2011. "On the map: Nature and Science editorials," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 86(1), pages 99-112, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:102:y:2015:i:1:d:10.1007_s11192-014-1443-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.