IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/reaccs/v20y2015i4d10.1007_s11142-015-9326-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding investor perceptions of financial statement fraud and their use of red flags: evidence from the field

Author

Listed:
  • Joseph F. Brazel

    (North Carolina State University)

  • Keith L. Jones

    (George Mason University)

  • Jane Thayer

    (University of Virginia)

  • Rick C. Warne

    (University of Cincinnati)

Abstract

We surveyed 194 experienced, nonprofessional investors to examine the relations between their perceptions of the frequency of financial reporting fraud, their use of financial statement information, the importance they place on conducting their own fraud risk assessments, and their use of fraud red flags. We find that investors’ perceptions of the frequency of fraud and their use of financial statement information positively influence the importance they place on conducting their own fraud risk assessments. Investors who place importance on assessing fraud risk make greater use of fraud red flags to avoid fraudulent investments. Red flags commonly relied upon include SEC investigations, pending litigation, violations of debt covenants, and high management turnover. Investors rely less on company size and age, the need for external financing, and the use of a non-Big 4 auditor. We also find evidence of positive associations between the use of specific red flags and investors’ portfolio returns.

Suggested Citation

  • Joseph F. Brazel & Keith L. Jones & Jane Thayer & Rick C. Warne, 2015. "Understanding investor perceptions of financial statement fraud and their use of red flags: evidence from the field," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 1373-1406, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:reaccs:v:20:y:2015:i:4:d:10.1007_s11142-015-9326-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s11142-015-9326-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11142-015-9326-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11142-015-9326-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:reaccs:v:20:y:2015:i:4:d:10.1007_s11142-015-9326-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.