IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/psycho/v55y1990i4p577-601.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the sampling theory roundations of item response theory models

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Holland

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Holland, 1990. "On the sampling theory roundations of item response theory models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 55(4), pages 577-601, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:55:y:1990:i:4:p:577-601
    DOI: 10.1007/BF02294609
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF02294609
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF02294609?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William Stout, 1987. "A nonparametric approach for assessing latent trait unidimensionality," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 52(4), pages 589-617, December.
    2. R. Bock & Murray Aitkin, 1981. "Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: Application of an EM algorithm," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 46(4), pages 443-459, December.
    3. Paul Holland, 1981. "When are item response models consistent with observed data?," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 46(1), pages 79-92, March.
    4. Paul Holland, 1990. "The Dutch Identity: A new tool for the study of item response models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 55(1), pages 5-18, March.
    5. Dean Follmann, 1988. "Consistent estimation in the rasch model based on nonparametric margins," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 53(4), pages 553-562, December.
    6. Paul Rosenbaum, 1984. "Testing the conditional independence and monotonicity assumptions of item response theory," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 49(3), pages 425-435, September.
    7. Noel Cressie & Paul Holland, 1983. "Characterizing the manifest probabilities of latent trait models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 48(1), pages 129-141, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sandip Sinharay & Paul Holland, 2010. "The Missing Data Assumptions of the NEAT Design and their Implications for Test Equating," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 75(2), pages 309-327, June.
    2. Ting Lin, 2007. "Identifying Optimal Items in Quality of Life Assessment," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 41(5), pages 661-672, October.
    3. Ting Lin & Grace Yao, 2009. "Evaluating Item Discrimination Power of WHOQOL-BREF from an Item Response Model Perspectives," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 91(2), pages 141-153, April.
    4. Paula Fariña & Jorge González & Ernesto San Martín, 2019. "The Use of an Identifiability-Based Strategy for the Interpretation of Parameters in the 1PL-G and Rasch Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 84(2), pages 511-528, June.
    5. Anders Skrondal & Sophia Rabe-Hesketh, 2022. "The Role of Conditional Likelihoods in Latent Variable Modeling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(3), pages 799-834, September.
    6. Stefano Noventa & Luca Stefanutti & Giulio Vidotto, 2014. "An Analysis of Item Response Theory and Rasch Models Based on the Most Probable Distribution Method," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 377-402, July.
    7. Ganglmair-Wooliscroft, Alexandra & Wooliscroft, Ben, 2016. "Diffusion of innovation: The case of ethical tourism behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 2711-2720.
    8. Robitzsch, Alexander, 2020. "About Still Nonignorable Consequences of (Partially) Ignoring Missing Item Responses in Large-scale Assessment," OSF Preprints hmy45, Center for Open Science.
    9. Jules L. Ellis, 2021. "A Test Can Have Multiple Reliabilities," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(4), pages 869-876, December.
    10. Merton S. Krause, 2017. "Item response theory requires logically unjustifiable assumptions," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 1549-1561, July.
    11. Chen, Yunxiao & Li, Xiaoou & Zhang, Siliang, 2019. "Structured latent factor analysis for large-scale data: identifiability, estimability, and their implications," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 101122, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Michael Maraun, 2017. "The object detection logic of latent variable technologies," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 239-259, January.
    13. Pascal Jordan & Martin Spiess, 2012. "Generalizations of Paradoxical Results in Multidimensional Item Response Theory," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 77(1), pages 127-152, January.
    14. Klaas Sijtsma & Julius M. Pfadt, 2021. "Rejoinder: The Future of Reliability," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(4), pages 887-892, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cees Glas, 1999. "Modification indices for the 2-PL and the nominal response model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 64(3), pages 273-294, September.
    2. A. Béguin & C. Glas, 2001. "MCMC estimation and some model-fit analysis of multidimensional IRT models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 66(4), pages 541-561, December.
    3. Jules Ellis & Arnold Wollenberg, 1993. "Local homogeneity in latent trait models. A characterization of the homogeneous monotone irt model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 58(3), pages 417-429, September.
    4. Mark Reiser, 1996. "Analysis of residuals for the multionmial item response model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 61(3), pages 509-528, September.
    5. Wim Linden, 1998. "Stochastic order in dichotomous item response models for fixed, adaptive, and multidimensional tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 63(3), pages 211-226, September.
    6. Jules L. Ellis & Klaas Sijtsma, 2023. "A Test to Distinguish Monotone Homogeneity from Monotone Multifactor Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(2), pages 387-412, June.
    7. Dean Follmann, 1988. "Consistent estimation in the rasch model based on nonparametric margins," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 53(4), pages 553-562, December.
    8. Paul Holland, 1990. "The Dutch Identity: A new tool for the study of item response models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 55(1), pages 5-18, March.
    9. David Hessen, 2012. "Fitting and Testing Conditional Multinormal Partial Credit Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 77(4), pages 693-709, October.
    10. William Stout, 1987. "A nonparametric approach for assessing latent trait unidimensionality," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 52(4), pages 589-617, December.
    11. Rudy Ligtvoet, 2022. "Incomplete Tests of Conditional Association for the Assessment of Model Assumptions," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(4), pages 1214-1237, December.
    12. David J. Hessen, 2023. "Fitting and Testing Log-Linear Subpopulation Models with Known Support," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(3), pages 917-939, September.
    13. Paul Rosenbaum, 1989. "Criterion-related construct validity," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 54(4), pages 625-633, September.
    14. Alexander Robitzsch, 2021. "A Comprehensive Simulation Study of Estimation Methods for the Rasch Model," Stats, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-23, October.
    15. Ke-Hai Yuan & Ying Cheng & Jeff Patton, 2014. "Information Matrices and Standard Errors for MLEs of Item Parameters in IRT," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 79(2), pages 232-254, April.
    16. Yuri Goegebeur & Paul Boeck & James Wollack & Allan Cohen, 2008. "A Speeded Item Response Model with Gradual Process Change," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 73(1), pages 65-87, March.
    17. Jules Ellis & Brian Junker, 1997. "Tail-measurability in monotone latent variable models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 62(4), pages 495-523, December.
    18. David J. Hessen, 2010. "Likelihood Ratio Tests for Special Rasch Models," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 35(6), pages 611-628, December.
    19. Svend Kreiner & Karl Christensen, 2011. "Item Screening in Graphical Loglinear Rasch Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 76(2), pages 228-256, April.
    20. David Hessen, 2005. "Constant latent odds-ratios models and the mantel-haenszel null hypothesis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 70(3), pages 497-516, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:55:y:1990:i:4:p:577-601. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.