IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/psycho/v46y1981i3p257-274.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using aptitude measurements for the optimal assignment of subjects to treatments with and without mastery scores

Author

Listed:
  • Wim Linden

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Wim Linden, 1981. "Using aptitude measurements for the optimal assignment of subjects to treatments with and without mastery scores," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 46(3), pages 257-274, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:46:y:1981:i:3:p:257-274
    DOI: 10.1007/BF02293734
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF02293734
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF02293734?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marvin H. Berhold, 1973. "The Use of Distribution Functions to Represent Utility Functions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(7), pages 825-829, March.
    2. Gideon Mellenbergh & Wim Linden, 1981. "The linear utility model for optimal selection," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 46(3), pages 283-293, September.
    3. Richard Potthoff, 1964. "On the Johnson-Neyman technique and some extensions thereof," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 29(3), pages 241-256, September.
    4. Huynh Huynh, 1976. "Statistical consideration of mastery scores," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 41(1), pages 65-78, March.
    5. G. S. Laumas, 1968. "Comment," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 23(4), pages 674-675, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael Brusco & Hans Köhn & Douglas Steinley, 2013. "Exact and approximate methods for a one-dimensional minimax bin-packing problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 206(1), pages 611-626, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wim Linden & Hans Vos, 1996. "A compensatory approach to optimal selection with mastery scores," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 61(1), pages 155-172, March.
    2. LiCalzi, Marco & Sorato, Annamaria, 2006. "The Pearson system of utility functions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(2), pages 560-573, July.
    3. Wynn C. Stirling & Teppo Felin, 2016. "Satisficing, preferences, and social interaction: a new perspective," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 81(2), pages 279-308, August.
    4. Huynh Huynh, 1980. "A nonrandomized minimax solution for passing scores in the binomial error model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 45(2), pages 167-182, June.
    5. Huynh Huynh, 1982. "A bayesian procedure for mastery decisions based on multivariate normal test data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 47(3), pages 309-319, September.
    6. Robert Bordley & Marco Licalzi & Luisa Tibiletti, 2017. "A Target-Based Foundation for the “Hard-Easy Effect” Bias," Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, in: Mehmet Huseyin Bilgin & Hakan Danis & Ender Demir & Ugur Can (ed.), Country Experiences in Economic Development, Management and Entrepreneurship, pages 659-671, Springer.
    7. Chen, Jeng-Chung & Yu, Vincent F., 2018. "Relationship between human error intervention strategies and unsafe acts: The role of strategy implementability," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 112-122.
    8. Ali Abbas, 2004. "Maximum Entropy Utility," Game Theory and Information 0403002, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Sanyu Zhou, 2018. "An exact method for the multiple comparison of several polynomial regression models with applications in dose-response study," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 102(3), pages 413-429, July.
    10. Denuit, Michel, 2016. "Risk Apportionment and Multiply Monotone Targets," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2016044, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    11. Denis Conniffe, 2007. "The Generalised Extreme Value Distribution as Utility Function," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 38(3), pages 275-288.
    12. Denuit, Michel M., 2018. "Risk apportionment and multiply monotone targets," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 74-77.
    13. Peter M. Fischer & Katharina P. Zeugner-Roth, 2017. "Disentangling country-of-origin effects: the interplay of product ethnicity, national identity, and consumer ethnocentrism," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 189-204, June.
    14. Marco LiCalzi, 2005. "A language for the construction of preferences under uncertainty," Game Theory and Information 0509002, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Olsen, Jesse E. & Gahan, Peter & Adamovic, Mladen & Choi, Daejeong & Harley, Bill & Healy, Joshua & Theilacker, Max, 2022. "When the Minority Rules: Leveraging Difference While Facilitating Congruence for Cultural Minority Senior Leaders," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(2).
    16. Ali E. Abbas, 2006. "Maximum Entropy Utility," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(2), pages 277-290, April.
    17. Xinwei Zhang & Qiong Feng & Shurong Tong & Hakki Eres, 2022. "Multilinear target-based decision analysis with hybrid-information targets and performance levels," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 605-647, December.
    18. Denny Borsboom & Henk Kelderman & Wim J. Linden, 2021. "Obituary GIDEON J. MELLENBERGH (1938–2021)," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(3), pages 836-840, September.
    19. Ann A. Lazar & Gary O. Zerbe, 2011. "Solutions for Determining the Significance Region Using the Johnson-Neyman Type Procedure in Generalized Linear (Mixed) Models," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 36(6), pages 699-719, December.
    20. Jeffrey M. Keisler & Robert F. Bordley, 2015. "Project Management Decisions with Uncertain Targets," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 12(1), pages 15-28, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:psycho:v:46:y:1981:i:3:p:257-274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.