IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/opsear/v58y2021i2d10.1007_s12597-020-00486-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparative study of two optimization approaches for solving bi-level multi-objective linear fractional programming problem

Author

Listed:
  • Rizk M. Rizk-Allah

    (Menoufia University)

  • Mahmoud A. Abo-Sinna

    (Badr University in Cairo)

Abstract

Despite the important role of bi-level multi-objective linear fractional programming (BL-MOLFP) problem for many hierarchical organizations, a very little success has been achieved to deal with this problem. This paper presents a comparative study between two computational approaches, namely fuzzy TOPSIS (technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution) approach and Jaya (a Sanskrit word meaning victory) approach, for solving BL-MOLFP problem. The fuzzy TOPSIS (FTOPSIS) approach aims to obtain the satisfactory solution of BL-MOLFP problem by using linearization process as well as formulating the membership functions for the distances of positive ideal solution (PIS) and negative ideal solution (NIS) for each level, respectively. In this sense, the deadlock situations among levels are avoided by establishing the membership functions for the upper level decision variables vector with possible tolerances. On the other hand, Jaya algorithm is proposed for solving BL-MOLFP problem based on nested structure scheme to optimize both levels hierarchically. An illustrative example is presented to describe the proposed approaches. In addition, the performances among the proposed approaches are assessed based on ranking strategy of the alternatives to affirm the superior approach. Based on the examined simulation, Jaya algorithm is preferable than the FTOPSIS approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Rizk M. Rizk-Allah & Mahmoud A. Abo-Sinna, 2021. "A comparative study of two optimization approaches for solving bi-level multi-objective linear fractional programming problem," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 58(2), pages 374-402, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:opsear:v:58:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s12597-020-00486-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s12597-020-00486-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12597-020-00486-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12597-020-00486-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lai, Young-Jou & Liu, Ting-Yun & Hwang, Ching-Lai, 1994. "TOPSIS for MODM," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 76(3), pages 486-500, August.
    2. R. E. Bellman & L. A. Zadeh, 1970. "Decision-Making in a Fuzzy Environment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 141-164, December.
    3. Rao, R. Venkata & Saroj, Ankit, 2017. "Constrained economic optimization of shell-and-tube heat exchangers using elitist-Jaya algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 785-800.
    4. Savita Mishra & Ajit Ghosh, 2006. "Interactive fuzzy programming approach to Bi-level quadratic fractional programming problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 143(1), pages 251-263, March.
    5. R. M. Rizk-Allah & Mahmoud A. Abo-Sinna, 2017. "Integrating reference point, Kuhn–Tucker conditions and neural network approach for multi-objective and multi-level programming problems," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 54(4), pages 663-683, December.
    6. Pramanik, Surapati & Roy, Tapan Kumar, 2007. "Fuzzy goal programming approach to multilevel programming problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(2), pages 1151-1166, January.
    7. Vyacheslav V. Kalashnikov & Stephan Dempe & Gerardo A. Pérez-Valdés & Nataliya I. Kalashnykova & José-Fernando Camacho-Vallejo, 2015. "Bilevel Programming and Applications," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2015, pages 1-16, March.
    8. Arora, S.R. & Gupta, Ritu, 2009. "Interactive fuzzy goal programming approach for bilevel programming problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 194(2), pages 368-376, April.
    9. Masatoshi Sakawa & Ichiro Nishizaki, 2012. "Interactive fuzzy programming for multi-level programming problems: a review," International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(3), pages 241-266.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Firoz Ahmad, 2022. "Interactive neutrosophic optimization technique for multiobjective programming problems: an application to pharmaceutical supply chain management," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(2), pages 551-585, April.
    2. Hong Wang & Xiaodong Zhang, 2018. "A Decentralized Bi-Level Fuzzy Two-Stage Decision Model for Flood Management," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(5), pages 1615-1629, March.
    3. Dempe, S., 2011. "Comment to "interactive fuzzy goal programming approach for bilevel programming problem" by S.R. Arora and R. Gupta," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 212(2), pages 429-431, July.
    4. M. A. El Sayed & Ibrahim A. Baky & Pitam Singh, 2020. "A modified TOPSIS approach for solving stochastic fuzzy multi-level multi-objective fractional decision making problem," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 57(4), pages 1374-1403, December.
    5. Wenyao Niu & Yuan Rong & Liying Yu & Lu Huang, 2022. "A Novel Hybrid Group Decision Making Approach Based on EDAS and Regret Theory under a Fermatean Cubic Fuzzy Environment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(17), pages 1-30, August.
    6. M. S. Osman & O. E. Emam & M. A. El Sayed, 2017. "Stochastic Fuzzy Multi-level Multi-objective Fractional Programming Problem: A FGP Approach," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 54(4), pages 816-840, December.
    7. Zajac, Sandra & Huber, Sandra, 2021. "Objectives and methods in multi-objective routing problems: a survey and classification scheme," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(1), pages 1-25.
    8. Sujit De & Shib Sana, 2015. "Backlogging EOQ model for promotional effort and selling price sensitive demand- an intuitionistic fuzzy approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 233(1), pages 57-76, October.
    9. Lachhwani, Kailash, 2015. "Modified FGP approach for multi-level multi objective linear fractional programming problems," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 266(C), pages 1038-1049.
    10. ShuJie Liao & Haiting Tu & Cheng Hu & Wulin Pan & Jianwu Xiong & Dongyang Yu & Lei Jing & Wei Pan, 2019. "Fuzzy multi-objective medical service organization selection model considering limited resources and stochastic demand in emergency management," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-15, March.
    11. Mishra, Savita, 2007. "Weighting method for bi-level linear fractional programming problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(1), pages 296-302, November.
    12. Zhang, Xiaodong & Vesselinov, Velimir V., 2016. "Energy-water nexus: Balancing the tradeoffs between two-level decision makers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 77-87.
    13. Cheng, Chi-Bin, 2011. "Reverse auction with buyer-supplier negotiation using bi-level distributed programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 211(3), pages 601-611, June.
    14. Vuciterna, Rina & Thomsen, Michael & Popp, Jennie & Musliu, Arben, 2017. "Efficiency and Competitiveness of Kosovo Raspberry Producers," 2017 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2017, Mobile, Alabama 252770, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    15. Gourav Gupta & Shivani & Deepika Rani, 2024. "Neutrosophic goal programming approach for multi-objective fixed-charge transportation problem with neutrosophic parameters," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 61(3), pages 1274-1300, September.
    16. Berna Tektas Sivrikaya & Ferhan Cebi & Hasan Hüseyin Turan & Nihat Kasap & Dursun Delen, 2017. "A fuzzy long-term investment planning model for a GenCo in a hybrid electricity market considering climate change impacts," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 975-991, October.
    17. Collan, Mikael, 2008. "New Method for Real Option Valuation Using Fuzzy Numbers," Working Papers 466, IAMSR, Åbo Akademi.
    18. Kim, Jong Soon & Whang, Kyu-Seung, 1998. "A tolerance approach to the fuzzy goal programming problems with unbalanced triangular membership function," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(3), pages 614-624, June.
    19. Berna Tektaş & Hasan Hüseyin Turan & Nihat Kasap & Ferhan Çebi & Dursun Delen, 2022. "A Fuzzy Prescriptive Analytics Approach to Power Generation Capacity Planning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-26, April.
    20. Chen, Lisa Y. & Wang, Tien-Chin, 2009. "Optimizing partners' choice in IS/IT outsourcing projects: The strategic decision of fuzzy VIKOR," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 233-242, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:opsear:v:58:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s12597-020-00486-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.