IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/operea/v25y2025i2d10.1007_s12351-025-00916-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New distance measure-based RANCOM-AROMAN approach for evaluating sustainable human resource management factors in the manufacturing firms

Author

Listed:
  • Pratibha Rani

    (Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS))

  • Arunodaya Raj Mishra

    (Government College Raigaon)

  • Adel Fahad Alrasheedi

    (King Saud University)

  • Ahmad M. Alshamrani

    (King Saud University)

  • Rajeev Dwivedi

    (Eastern Washington University)

Abstract

With the economic development, firms must pay attention to social development and encourage environmental sustainability in identical synchronization. Sustainable human resource management (SHRM) tactics make it possible to achieve social economic and environmental (SEE) objectives of firms. In the following, a survey approach is presented considering the literature review and online questionnaire to recognize key factors in the SHRM assessment of manufacturing firms in India. Ambiguity and uncertainty are generally occurred in the evaluation of diverse SHRM factors. As a generalization of fuzzy set, single-valued neutrosophic set (SVNS) has been considered as a significant mode to deal with the indeterminate, inconsistent and uncertain data of realistic decision-making problems. Taking into account of the notion of SVNSs, this paper proposes novel decision-making framework for evaluating SHRM of manufacturing firms. In the following goal, first, an extended alternative ranking order method accounting for two-step normalization is developed with SVN-score function-based decision experts’ (DEs’) weight finding procedure and united criteria weight-estimating approach to deal decision-making problems. Second, new SVN-distance measure (SVN-DM) is introduced to estimate degree of discrimination on SVNSs. Some different examples are given to exemplify the effectiveness of proposed SVN-DM with different existing measures. Third, new criteria weight-estimating approach is discussed by integrating the objective weight with maximum deviation method using proposed SVN-DM and subjective weight with ranking comparison model on SVNSs. Fourth, the developed ranking framework is employed on a case study of SHRM assessment for manufacturing firms in India, which expresses the utility and practicability. In this work, the assessment factors are considered as SEE dimensions with different DE’s views. Sensitivity and comparative evaluations are made to display the strength and stability of proposed ranking framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Pratibha Rani & Arunodaya Raj Mishra & Adel Fahad Alrasheedi & Ahmad M. Alshamrani & Rajeev Dwivedi, 2025. "New distance measure-based RANCOM-AROMAN approach for evaluating sustainable human resource management factors in the manufacturing firms," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 1-37, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:operea:v:25:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s12351-025-00916-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s12351-025-00916-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12351-025-00916-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12351-025-00916-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiaochun Luo & Zilong Wang & Liguo Yang & Lin Lu & Song Hu, 2023. "Sustainable supplier selection based on VIKOR with single-valued neutrosophic sets," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(9), pages 1-27, September.
    2. Astrid Kainzbauer & Parisa Rungruang & Philip Hallinger, 2021. "How Does Research on Sustainable Human Resource Management Contribute to Corporate Sustainability: A Document Co-Citation Analysis, 1982–2021," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, October.
    3. Ying Jiang & Xiaolong Xue & Weirui Xue, 2018. "Proactive Corporate Environmental Responsibility and Financial Performance: Evidence from Chinese Energy Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-13, March.
    4. Ehnert, Ina & Harry, Wes, 2012. "Recent Developments and Future Prospects on Sustainable Human Resource Management: Introduction to the Special Issue," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 23(3), pages 221-238.
    5. Maria Järlström & Essi Saru & Sinikka Vanhala, 2018. "Sustainable Human Resource Management with Salience of Stakeholders: A Top Management Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(3), pages 703-724, October.
    6. Ivana Nikolić & Jelena Milutinović & Darko Božanić & Momčilo Dobrodolac, 2023. "Using an Interval Type-2 Fuzzy AROMAN Decision-Making Method to Improve the Sustainability of the Postal Network in Rural Areas," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-26, July.
    7. Jun Ye, 2017. "Single-Valued Neutrosophic Clustering Algorithms Based on Similarity Measures," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 34(1), pages 148-162, April.
    8. Katarzyna Piwowar‐Sulej, 2021. "Core functions of Sustainable Human Resource Management. A hybrid literature review with the use of H‐Classics methodology," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(4), pages 671-693, July.
    9. Niloufar Fallah Shayan & Nasrin Mohabbati-Kalejahi & Sepideh Alavi & Mohammad Ali Zahed, 2022. "Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as a Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-27, January.
    10. Ehnert, Ina & Harry, Wes, 2012. "Recent Developments and Future Prospects on Sustainable Human Resource Management: Introduction to the Special Issue," management revue. Socio-economic Studies, Rainer Hampp Verlag, vol. 23(3), pages 221-238.
    11. Cachón-Rodríguez, Gabriel & Blanco-González, Alicia & Prado-Román, Camilo & Del-Castillo-Feito, Cristina, 2022. "How sustainable human resources management helps in the evaluation and planning of employee loyalty and retention: Can social capital make a difference?," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    12. Bilal Bin Saeed & Bilal Afsar & Shakir Hafeez & Imran Khan & Muhammad Tahir & Muhammad Asim Afridi, 2019. "Promoting employee's proenvironmental behavior through green human resource management practices," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(2), pages 424-438, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barbara Sypniewska & Małgorzata Baran & Monika Kłos, 2023. "Work engagement and employee satisfaction in the practice of sustainable human resource management – based on the study of Polish employees," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 1069-1100, September.
    2. Astrid Kainzbauer & Parisa Rungruang, 2019. "Science Mapping the Knowledge Base on Sustainable Human Resource Management, 1982–2019," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-22, July.
    3. Natàlia Cugueró-Escofet & Pilar Ficapal-Cusí & Joan Torrent-Sellens, 2019. "Sustainable Human Resource Management: How to Create a Knowledge Sharing Behavior through Organizational Justice, Organizational Support, Satisfaction and Commitment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-20, September.
    4. Živilė Stankevičiūtė & Eglė Staniškienė & Urtė Ciganė, 2020. "Sustainable HRM as a Driver for Innovative Work Behaviour: Do Respect, Openness, and Continuity Matter? The Case of Lithuania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-29, July.
    5. Štěpánka Hronová & Miroslav Špaček, 2021. "Sustainable HRM Practices in Corporate Reporting," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-34, May.
    6. Guosen Miao & Guoping Chen & Fan Wang & Anupam Kumar Das, 2023. "The Effect of Corporate Greenwashing on Employees’ Environmental Performance: Person–Organization Values Fit Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    7. Shao-Long Li & Fang Sun & Mingze Li, 2019. "Sustainable Human Resource Management Nurtures Change-Oriented Employees: Relationship between High-Commitment Work Systems and Employees’ Taking Charge Behaviors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-15, June.
    8. Priya Shah & Richa Singh Dubey & Shashikant Rai & Douglas W. S. Renwick & Saurabh Misra, 2024. "Green human resource management: A comprehensive investigation using bibliometric analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 31-53, January.
    9. Çiğdem VATANSEVER & Nevin KILIÇ & Gülesra DİNLER, 2018. "Yeşil Örgütsel Davranış Ölçeği: Bir Ölçek Geliştirme Çalışması," Istanbul Management Journal, Istanbul University Business School, vol. 29(85), pages 7-39, December.
    10. Astrid Kainzbauer & Parisa Rungruang & Philip Hallinger, 2021. "How Does Research on Sustainable Human Resource Management Contribute to Corporate Sustainability: A Document Co-Citation Analysis, 1982–2021," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, October.
    11. Adolfo Carballo‐Penela & Emilio Ruzo‐Sanmartín & Carlos M. P. Sousa, 2023. "Does business commitment to sustainability increase job seekers' perceptions of organisational attractiveness? The role of organisational prestige and cultural masculinity," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5521-5535, December.
    12. Mónica Santana & Rafael Morales-Sánchez & Susana Pasamar, 2020. "Mapping the Link between Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Human Resource Management (HRM): How Is This Relationship Measured?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-28, February.
    13. Anna-Maija Lämsä & Suvi Heikkinen & Raminta PuÄ Ä—taitÄ—, 2023. "Social Sustainability, Leadership and Human Resource Management," South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, , vol. 12(1), pages 7-13, April.
    14. Aslanertik Banu Esra & Çolak Murat, 2021. "The Link Between Sustainability Reporting and the Core Characteristics of Sustainable Human Resource Management," International Journal of Contemporary Management, Sciendo, vol. 57(4), pages 15-24, December.
    15. Shaha Faisal, 2023. "Twenty-Years Journey of Sustainable Human Resource Management Research: A Bibliometric Analysis," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, May.
    16. Beatrice I.J.M. Van der Heijden & Ans De Vos, 2015. "Sustainable careers: introductory chapter," Chapters, in: Handbook of Research on Sustainable Careers, chapter 1, pages 1-19, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    17. Tom Baum & Catherine Cheung & Haiyan Kong & Anna Kralj & Shelagh Mooney & Hải Nguyễn Thị Thanh & Sridar Ramachandran & Marinela Dropulić Ružić & May Ling Siow, 2016. "Sustainability and the Tourism and Hospitality Workforce: A Thematic Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-21, August.
    18. Jennifer Kim Lian Chan & Steward Giman Anak Stephen & Andi Tamsang Andi Kele, 2021. "Exploring Sustainable Human Resource Practices and Framework in Star-Rated Hotels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-15, August.
    19. Antonius Setyadi & Yunata Kandhias Akbar & Sunda Ariana & Suharno Pawirosumarto, 2023. "Examining the Effect of Green Logistics and Green Human Resource Management on Sustainable Development Organizations: The Mediating Role of Sustainable Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, July.
    20. Wagner, Marcus, 2015. "A European perspective on country moderation effects: Environmental management systems and sustainability-related human resource benefits," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 379-388.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:operea:v:25:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s12351-025-00916-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.