IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v121y2025i10d10.1007_s11069-025-07231-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Disparate household recovery outcomes in rural communities: a longitudinal analysis of Hurricane Michael's impact on the Florida Panhandle

Author

Listed:
  • Diana Mitsova

    (Florida Atlantic University)

  • Ann-Margaret Esnard

    (Florida Atlantic University
    Georgia State University)

  • Monica Escaleras

    (Florida Atlantic University
    Florida Atlantic University)

  • Alka Sapat

    (Florida Atlantic University
    Florida Atlantic University)

  • Lilah Besser

    (Florida Atlantic University
    University of Miami)

Abstract

The unequal distribution and impact of disasters in the United States are well documented but there are gaps in scholarship on recovery outcomes in rural communities. We help fill this gap with a longitudinal analysis of self-reported household recovery outcomes in the Florida Panhandle following the destructive Category 5 Hurricane Michael, which made landfall in Mexico Beach, FL, on October 10, 2018. A total of 909 survey responses were collected approximately 5 months after the hurricane made landfall in the fifteen counties designated by FEMA as eligible for both individual and public assistance. The survey was conducted via Automated Telephone Interviewing (ATI) (landlines) (n = 451) and online (n = 458). The two samples were merged using propensity score matching. Five months after Hurricane Michael made landfall, more than 40% of the respondents said they fully recovered, 21.7% mostly recovered, 23.7% somewhat recovered, and 9.1% reported not recovering. The respondents from the ATI sample were recontacted with a follow-up survey 17 months after the hurricane's landfall. The panel data consisted of 156 respondents who were matched across the two phone surveys. Most participants (64%) in the matched sample reported they had recovered, while 34% did not. The results from a fitted random-intercept logistic regression model indicated that the severity of the damage, extended power outages, income loss, and difficulties getting access to food, fuel, and basic services had highly significant inverse associations with reported positive recovery outcomes. Homeowners' insurance had a highly significant positive association with recovery. Concerns over shortages of food supplies and fuel showed inverse associations with recovery. Compared to those who received disaster assistance, the odds of recovery for those whose applications were denied or still pending were significantly lower. The results help inform disaster management planning, policies, and practices to improve disaster recovery outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Diana Mitsova & Ann-Margaret Esnard & Monica Escaleras & Alka Sapat & Lilah Besser, 2025. "Disparate household recovery outcomes in rural communities: a longitudinal analysis of Hurricane Michael's impact on the Florida Panhandle," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(10), pages 11337-11369, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:10:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07231-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-025-07231-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-025-07231-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-025-07231-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas W. Haase & Wen-Jiun Wang & Ashley D. Ross, 2021. "The six capacities of community resilience: evidence from three small Texas communities impacted by Hurricane Harvey," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 109(1), pages 1097-1118, October.
    2. Caroline Hachem-Vermette & Somil Yadav, 2023. "Impact of Power Interruption on Buildings and Neighborhoods and Potential Technical and Design Adaptation Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-26, October.
    3. Jurjonas, Matthew & Seekamp, Erin & Rivers, Louie & Cutts, Bethany, 2020. "Uncovering climate (in)justice with an adaptive capacity assessment: A multiple case study in rural coastal North Carolina," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    4. Diana Mitsova & Ann-Margaret Esnard & Alka Sapat & Betty S. Lai, 2018. "Socioeconomic vulnerability and electric power restoration timelines in Florida: the case of Hurricane Irma," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 94(2), pages 689-709, November.
    5. Craig Trumbo & Michelle A. Meyer & Holly Marlatt & Lori Peek & Bridget Morrissey, 2014. "An Assessment of Change in Risk Perception and Optimistic Bias for Hurricanes Among Gulf Coast Residents," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(6), pages 1013-1024, June.
    6. Sara K. E. Peterson & Susan Spierre Clark & Michael A. Shelly & Samantha E. M. Horn, 2024. "Assessing the household burdens of infrastructure disruptions in Texas during Winter Storm Uri," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(8), pages 7065-7104, June.
    7. Justin Baker & W. Douglass Shaw & Mary Riddel & Richard T. Woodward, 2009. "Changes in subjective risks of hurricanes as time passes: analysis of a sample of Katrina evacuees," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 59-74, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patricia A Champ & Hannah Brenkert‐Smith, 2016. "Is Seeing Believing? Perceptions of Wildfire Risk Over Time," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(4), pages 816-830, April.
    2. Smitha Rao & Shane A. Scaggs & Alexandria Asuan & Anais D. Roque, 2025. "Power outages and social vulnerability in the U.S. Gulf Coast: multilevel Bayesian models of outage durations amid rising extreme weather," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    3. Craig W. Trumbo & Lori Peek & Michelle A. Meyer & Holly L. Marlatt & Eve Gruntfest & Brian D. McNoldy & Wayne H. Schubert, 2016. "A Cognitive‐Affective Scale for Hurricane Risk Perception," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(12), pages 2233-2246, December.
    4. Simone Cerroni & Sandra Notaro & W. Douglass Shaw, 2011. "Do Monetary Incentives and Chained Questions Affect the Validity of Risk Estimates Elicited via the Exchangeability Method? An Experimental Investigation," Department of Economics Working Papers 1110, Department of Economics, University of Trento, Italia.
    5. Vivian Do & Heather McBrien & Nina M. Flores & Alexander J. Northrop & Jeffrey Schlegelmilch & Mathew V. Kiang & Joan A. Casey, 2023. "Spatiotemporal distribution of power outages with climate events and social vulnerability in the USA," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    6. Mühlhofer, Evelyn & Koks, Elco E. & Kropf, Chahan M. & Sansavini, Giovanni & Bresch, David N., 2023. "A generalized natural hazard risk modelling framework for infrastructure failure cascades," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    7. Xiangpeng Li & Junwei Ma & Bo Li & Ali Mostafavi, 2025. "Quantifying the Social Costs of Power Outages and Restoration Disparities Across Four U.S. Hurricanes," Papers 2509.02653, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2025.
    8. Andrew Royal & Margaret Walls, 2019. "Flood Risk Perceptions and Insurance Choice: Do Decisions in the Floodplain Reflect Overoptimism?," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(5), pages 1088-1104, May.
    9. Navin Bhatta & Shakhawat H. Tanim & Pamela Murray-Tuite, 2024. "Dynamics of Link Importance through Normal Conditions, Flood Response, and Recovery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-35, January.
    10. Cheng-Chun Lee & Mikel Maron & Ali Mostafavi, 2022. "Community-scale big data reveals disparate impacts of the Texas winter storm of 2021 and its managed power outage," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, December.
    11. Qin, Hua & Sanders, Christine & Prasetyo, Yanu & Syukron, Muh. & Prentice, Elizabeth, 2021. "Exploring the dynamic relationships between risk perception and behavior in response to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    12. Paul Nduhuura & Matthias Garschagen & Abdellatif Zerga, 2020. "Mapping and Spatial Analysis of Electricity Load Shedding Experiences: A Case Study of Communities in Accra, Ghana," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-26, August.
    13. Craig Trumbo & Michelle A. Meyer & Holly Marlatt & Lori Peek & Bridget Morrissey, 2014. "An Assessment of Change in Risk Perception and Optimistic Bias for Hurricanes Among Gulf Coast Residents," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(6), pages 1013-1024, June.
    14. Laura N. Rickard & Z. Janet Yang & Jonathon P. Schuldt & Gina M. Eosco & Clifford W. Scherer & Ricardo A. Daziano, 2017. "Sizing Up a Superstorm: Exploring the Role of Recalled Experience and Attribution of Responsibility in Judgments of Future Hurricane Risk," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(12), pages 2334-2349, December.
    15. K. Burrows & G. B. Anderson & M. Yan & A. Wilson & M. B. Sabath & J. Y. Son & H. Kim & F. Dominici & M. L. Bell, 2023. "Health disparities among older adults following tropical cyclone exposure in Florida," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    16. Uji, Azusa & Song, Jaehyun & Dolšak, Nives & Prakash, Aseem, 2024. "Willingness to incur private costs for climate adaptation? Public support for undergrounding electricity transmission lines in California," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    17. Jasiūnas, Justinas & Lund, Peter D. & Mikkola, Jani & Koskela, Liinu, 2021. "Linking socio-economic aspects to power system disruption models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    18. Daria Freier Raine & Firdaus Muhammad-Sukki & Roberto Ramirez-Iniguez & Jorge Alfredo Ardila-Rey & Tahseen Jafry & Carlos Gamio, 2021. "Embodied Energy and Cost Assessments of a Concentrating Photovoltaic Module," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-15, December.
    19. Mehrnoosh Asadi & James I. Price & Roselinde Kessels & Pallab Mozumder, 2024. "Hurricane-Induced Power Disruptions: Household Preferences for Improving Infrastructure Resilience," Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 235-261, July.
    20. Daran Gray‐Scholz & Timothy J. Haney & Pamela MacQuarrie, 2019. "Out of Sight, Out of Mind? Geographic and Social Predictors of Flood Risk Awareness," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(11), pages 2543-2558, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:121:y:2025:i:10:d:10.1007_s11069-025-07231-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.