IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v117y2023i1d10.1007_s11069-023-05884-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A stochastic exposure model for seismic risk assessment and pricing of catastrophe bonds

Author

Listed:
  • Harsh K. Mistry

    (University of Manchester)

  • Domenico Lombardi

    (University of Manchester
    University of Manchester)

Abstract

Risk-based catastrophe bonds require the estimation of losses from the convolution of hazard, exposure and vulnerability models. These models are affected by different uncertainties that arise from the definition of their input parameters. In this paper, we propose a stochastic approach to treat the uncertainty in the asset location and attributes of the exposure model. The proposed method uses the Monte Carlo sampling approach to generate a stochastic exposure database, where each asset location is generated randomly within the geometric bound of the administration, while the asset attributes (i.e. construction type and material, number of storey, building activity type and number of dwelling) are sampled from distributions built from census data. Finally, a sensitivity analysis is performed to investigate the influence of the spatial resolution of the exposure model on the average annual losses (AAL) and catastrophe bond prices. To this end, we implement four exposure models, with spatial resolution at the asset, municipality and province levels, on a study region comprising ten provinces in southern Italy. Compared to the proposed model, the exposure model where assets are relocated and aggregated at the geometric centroid of the municipality underestimates AAL by $$8\%$$ 8 % , while a higher difference (up to $$20\%$$ 20 % ) is observed for the exposure model where assets are relocated and aggregated at the geometric centroid of the province. We also consider an exposure model whose asset locations are extracted from publicly available building footprints. Yet, this latter model was incomplete for some provinces resulting in underestimation of AAL up to $$90\%$$ 90 % . Differences in catastrophe bond prices obtained from the four exposure models are less evident, with the exposure model built based on the building footprints showing a difference up to $$9.5\%$$ 9.5 % .

Suggested Citation

  • Harsh K. Mistry & Domenico Lombardi, 2023. "A stochastic exposure model for seismic risk assessment and pricing of catastrophe bonds," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 117(1), pages 803-829, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:117:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-023-05884-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-023-05884-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-023-05884-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-023-05884-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aglaia Petseti & Milton Nektarios, 2012. "Proposal for a National Earthquake Insurance Programme for Greece," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 37(2), pages 377-400, April.
    2. Shao, Jia & Papaioannou, Apostolos D. & Pantelous, Athanasios A., 2017. "Pricing and simulating catastrophe risk bonds in a Markov-dependent environment," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 309(C), pages 68-84.
    3. John C. Cox & Jonathan E. Ingersoll Jr. & Stephen A. Ross, 2005. "A Theory Of The Term Structure Of Interest Rates," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Sudipto Bhattacharya & George M Constantinides (ed.), Theory Of Valuation, chapter 5, pages 129-164, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    4. Athanasios Gkimprixis & John Douglas & Enrico Tubaldi, 2021. "Seismic risk management through insurance and its sensitivity to uncertainty in the hazard model," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 108(2), pages 1629-1657, September.
    5. Wolfgang Karl Härdle & Brenda López Cabrera, 2010. "Calibrating CAT Bonds for Mexican Earthquakes," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 77(3), pages 625-650, September.
    6. M. Yucemen, 2005. "Probabilistic Assessment of Earthquake Insurance Rates for Turkey," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 35(2), pages 291-313, June.
    7. Ma, Zong-Gang & Ma, Chao-Qun, 2013. "Pricing catastrophe risk bonds: A mixed approximation method," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 243-254.
    8. Christoph Scheingraber & Martin A. Käser, 2019. "The Impact of Portfolio Location Uncertainty on Probabilistic Seismic Risk Analysis," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(3), pages 695-712, March.
    9. Ling Tian & Peng Yao, 2015. "Preferences for earthquake insurance in rural China: factors influencing individuals’ willingness to pay," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 79(1), pages 93-110, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sukono & Herlina Napitupulu & Riaman & Riza Andrian Ibrahim & Muhamad Deni Johansyah & Rizki Apriva Hidayana, 2023. "A Regional Catastrophe Bond Pricing Model and Its Application in Indonesia’s Provinces," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-20, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Riza Andrian Ibrahim & Sukono & Herlina Napitupulu & Rose Irnawaty Ibrahim, 2023. "How to Price Catastrophe Bonds for Sustainable Earthquake Funding? A Systematic Review of the Pricing Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-19, May.
    2. Dixon Domfeh & Arpita Chatterjee & Matthew Dixon, 2022. "A Unified Bayesian Framework for Pricing Catastrophe Bond Derivatives," Papers 2205.04520, arXiv.org.
    3. Shao, Jia & Papaioannou, Apostolos D. & Pantelous, Athanasios A., 2017. "Pricing and simulating catastrophe risk bonds in a Markov-dependent environment," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 309(C), pages 68-84.
    4. Carolyn W. Chang & Jack S. K. Chang & Min‐Teh Yu & Yang Zhao, 2020. "Portfolio optimization in the catastrophe space," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 26(5), pages 1414-1448, November.
    5. Wulan Anggraeni & Sudradjat Supian & Sukono & Nurfadhlina Binti Abdul Halim, 2022. "Earthquake Catastrophe Bond Pricing Using Extreme Value Theory: A Mini-Review Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(22), pages 1-22, November.
    6. Krzysztof Burnecki & Mario Nicoló Giuricich, 2017. "Stable Weak Approximation at Work in Index-Linked Catastrophe Bond Pricing," Risks, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Giuricich, Mario Nicoló & Burnecki, Krzysztof, 2019. "Modelling of left-truncated heavy-tailed data with application to catastrophe bond pricing," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 525(C), pages 498-513.
    8. Ma, Zong-Gang & Ma, Chao-Qun, 2013. "Pricing catastrophe risk bonds: A mixed approximation method," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 243-254.
    9. Han-Bin KANG & Hsuling CHANG & Tsangyao CHANG, 2022. "Catastrophe Reinsurance Pricing -Modification of Dynamic Asset-Liability Management," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(4), pages 5-20, December.
    10. Ben Ammar, Semir & Braun, Alexander & Eling, Martin, 2015. "Alternative Risk Transfer and Insurance-Linked Securities: Trends, Challenges and New Market Opportunities," I.VW HSG Schriftenreihe, University of St.Gallen, Institute of Insurance Economics (I.VW-HSG), volume 56, number 56.
    11. Burnecki, Krzysztof & Giuricich, Mario Nicoló & Palmowski, Zbigniew, 2019. "Valuation of contingent convertible catastrophe bonds — The case for equity conversion," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 238-254.
    12. Loretta Mastroeni & Alessandro Mazzoccoli & Maurizio Naldi, 2022. "Pricing Cat Bonds for Cloud Service Failures," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-18, October.
    13. Braun, Alexander, 2011. "Pricing catastrophe swaps: A contingent claims approach," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 520-536.
    14. Vajira Manathunga & Linmiao Deng, 2023. "Pricing Pandemic Bonds under Hull–White & Stochastic Logistic Growth Model," Risks, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-28, August.
    15. Sukono & Hafizan Juahir & Riza Andrian Ibrahim & Moch Panji Agung Saputra & Yuyun Hidayat & Igif Gimin Prihanto, 2022. "Application of Compound Poisson Process in Pricing Catastrophe Bonds: A Systematic Literature Review," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(15), pages 1-19, July.
    16. Truong, Chi & Trück, Stefan, 2016. "It’s not now or never: Implications of investment timing and risk aversion on climate adaptation to extreme events," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 253(3), pages 856-868.
    17. Lo, Chien-Ling & Lee, Jin-Ping & Yu, Min-Teh, 2013. "Valuation of insurers’ contingent capital with counterparty risk and price endogeneity," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(12), pages 5025-5035.
    18. Têtu Alexandre & Lai Van Son & Soumaré Issouf & Gendron Michel, 2015. "Hedging Flood Losses Using Cat Bonds," Asia-Pacific Journal of Risk and Insurance, De Gruyter, vol. 9(2), pages 149-184, July.
    19. Zied Chaieb & Djibril Gueye, 2022. "Pricing zero-coupon CAT bonds using the enlargement of ltration theory: a general framework ," Post-Print hal-03745077, HAL.
    20. Zied Chaieb & Djibril Gueye, 2022. "Pricing zero-coupon CAT bonds using the enlargement of ltration theory: a general framework," Papers 2208.02609, arXiv.org.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:117:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-023-05884-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.