IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/metron/v83y2025i1d10.1007_s40300-024-00276-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Neither agree nor disagree: use and misuse of the neutral response category in Likert-type scales

Author

Listed:
  • Miloš Kankaraš

    (UNESCO Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Education for Peace and Sustainable Development (MGIEP))

  • Stefania Capecchi

    (University of Naples Federico II)

Abstract

The Likert-type scales are among the most widely implemented instruments in social sciences, nonetheless, it is not clear so far whether such scales should or should not employ a mid-point “neutral” response option. While a mid-point category might improve the psychometric properties of survey instruments when appropriately applied, it has been argued that respondents often tend to use it in several invalid ways. This study aims to examine how a neutral response modality may influence the scales’ psychometric properties. We conducted two types of survey experiments employing a between-subjects and a within-subjects design, comparing psychometric properties of twelve personality scales in both cases i.e., with and without the neutral response category. Our findings show that the scales presenting the neutral category allow to some extent for better psychometric characteristics, both in terms of their reliability and with respect to the proportion of accounted variance by the first factors. Results also suggest that most respondents seem to use the neutral category validly. However, there are also indications that a minority of respondents actually employ the neutral answer as an “escape” option, especially when asked socially sensitive questions.

Suggested Citation

  • Miloš Kankaraš & Stefania Capecchi, 2025. "Neither agree nor disagree: use and misuse of the neutral response category in Likert-type scales," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 83(1), pages 111-140, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:metron:v:83:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s40300-024-00276-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s40300-024-00276-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40300-024-00276-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s40300-024-00276-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:metron:v:83:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s40300-024-00276-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.