IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joimai/v26y2025i2d10.1007_s12134-024-01204-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of COVID-19 on Immigration Attitudes in the US

Author

Listed:
  • Guadalupe Madrigal

    (UCSB)

  • Stuart Soroka

    (University of California Los Angeles)

Abstract

In October 2020, the Centers for Disease Control in the U.S. introduced “Title 42” as an effort to stop the spread of COVID-19 by halting almost all forms of immigration. This policy is a clear illustration of the link between immigration and perceived disease contagion, and the association is not new. There is, in fact, a longstanding literature on the relationship between “contagion threat” and attitudes towards immigration. How might these attitudes shift in light of the COVID-19 pandemic? This study uses a two-wave panel survey of immigration attitudes (Wave 1 in October 2019 before COVID-19 and Wave 2 in April 2020 during lockdowns in the US) and finds some important shifts in attitudes. We find no evidence that underlying support for immigration was changed by the pandemic. That said, Democrats worried about the threat of COVID-19 increasingly supported lower levels of immigration, and Republicans worried about the threat of COVID-19 were more likely to support financial relief for immigrants. The pandemic is thus a timely illustration of the connection between immigration and contagion threat.

Suggested Citation

  • Guadalupe Madrigal & Stuart Soroka, 2025. "The Impact of COVID-19 on Immigration Attitudes in the US," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 873-900, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:joimai:v:26:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s12134-024-01204-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s12134-024-01204-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12134-024-01204-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12134-024-01204-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aarøe, Lene & Petersen, Michael Bang & Arceneaux, Kevin, 2017. "The Behavioral Immune System Shapes Political Intuitions: Why and How Individual Differences in Disgust Sensitivity Underlie Opposition to Immigration," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 111(2), pages 277-294, May.
    2. Ted Brader & Nicholas A. Valentino & Elizabeth Suhay, 2008. "What Triggers Public Opposition to Immigration? Anxiety, Group Cues, and Immigration Threat," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(4), pages 959-978, October.
    3. Alan Abramowitz & Jennifer McCoy, 2019. "United States: Racial Resentment, Negative Partisanship, and Polarization in Trump’s America," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 681(1), pages 137-156, January.
    4. George Hawley, 2011. "Political Threat and Immigration: Party Identification, Demographic Context, and Immigration Policy Preference," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 92(2), pages 404-422, June.
    5. Macdonald, David, 2021. "Political Trust and Support for Immigration in the American Mass Public," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 51(4), pages 1402-1420, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mark Pickup & Eline A. de Rooij & Clifton van der Linden & Matthew J. Goodwin, 2021. "Brexit, COVID‐19, and attitudes toward immigration in Britain," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(5), pages 2184-2193, September.
    2. Adam M. Enders & Jason Gainous & Kevin M. Wagner, 2022. "Say it again with feeling: Issue ownership and candidate communication using Twitter," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 103(4), pages 959-974, July.
    3. Hix, Simon & Kaufmann, Eric & Leeper, Thomas J., 2020. "Pricing immigration," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 103268, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Giovanni Facchini & Anna Maria Mayda & Riccardo Puglisi, 2017. "Illegal immigration and media exposure: evidence on individual attitudes," IZA Journal of Migration and Development, Springer;Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 7(1), pages 1-36, December.
    5. Cattaneo, Cristina & Grieco, Daniela, 2021. "Turning opposition into support to immigration: The role of narratives," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 785-801.
    6. Turner Thomas & Cross Christine, 2025. "Unemployment and attitudes to immigrants in Europe: A comparison of early and late countries of immigration," Administration, Sciendo, vol. 73(3), pages 61-86.
    7. Maja Adena & Ruben Enikolopov & Maria Petrova & Veronica Santarosa & Ekaterina Zhuravskaya, 2015. "Radio and the Rise of The Nazis in Prewar Germany," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 130(4), pages 1885-1939.
    8. Mehmet Nazım Uygur & Selahaddin Bakan, 2025. "Agitation Strategies of Anti-immigrant: The Populist and Neoliberal Lens," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 813-840, June.
    9. Markaki, Yvonni, 2012. "Sources of anti-immigration attitudes in the United Kingdom: the impact of population, labour market and skills context," ISER Working Paper Series 2012-24, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    10. Nikhar Gaikwad & Gareth Nellis, 2017. "The Majority‐Minority Divide in Attitudes toward Internal Migration: Evidence from Mumbai," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 61(2), pages 456-472, April.
    11. Edward Anthony Koning & Neeraj Kaushal, 2024. "The Role of Politics in Public Views About Immigrants," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 2095-2122, December.
    12. Dražanová, Lenka & Gonnot, Jérôme & Heidland, Tobias & Krüger, Finja, 2022. "Understanding differences in attitudes to immigration: A meta-analysis of individual-level factors," Kiel Working Papers 2235, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    13. Sumit S. Deole & Yue Huang, 2024. "Suffering and prejudice: do negative emotions predict immigration concerns?," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 37(2), pages 1-39, June.
    14. Economidou Claire & Karamanis Dimitris & Kechrinioti Alexandra & Xesfingi Sofia, 2020. "The Role of Social Capital in Shaping Europeans’ Immigration Sentiments," IZA Journal of Development and Migration, Sciendo & Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 11(1), pages 1-31, January.
    15. Sarah Schneider-Strawczynski & Jérôme Valette, 2025. "Media Coverage of Immigration and the Polarization of Attitudes," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 17(1), pages 337-368, January.
    16. Richard Hanania, 2021. "Cui Bono? Partisanship and Attitudes Toward Refugees," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(1), pages 166-178, January.
    17. Niambi M. Carter & Tyson D. King-Meadows, 2019. "Perceptual Knots and Black Identity Politics: Linked Fate, American Heritage, and Support for Trump Era Immigration Policy," Societies, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-27, January.
    18. Juan Carlos Martín & Alessandro Indelicato, 2022. "A DEA MCDM Approach Applied to ESS8 Dataset for Measuring Immigration and Refugees Citizens’ Openness," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 1941-1961, December.
    19. Shawn Ratcliff, 2022. "Presidential firepower: The effect of the presidential party on gun ownership, 1980–2018," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 103(3), pages 737-751, May.
    20. Maxime Walder & Oliver Strijbis, 2022. "Negative Party Identification and the Use of Party Cues in the Direct Democratic Context," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(4), pages 325-335.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joimai:v:26:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s12134-024-01204-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.