IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/joevec/v31y2021i3d10.1007_s00191-020-00713-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coffee Berry Borer (Hypothenemus hampei) and its role in the evolutionary diversification of the coffee market

Author

Listed:
  • Hernán Darío Toro-Zapata

    (Universidad del Quindío)

  • Carlos Andrés Trujillo-Salazar

    (Universidad del Quindío)

  • Fabio Dercole

    (Politecnico di Milano)

  • Gerard Olivar-Tost

    (Universidad de Aysén
    Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Manizales)

Abstract

The Coffee Berry Borer (CBB) is the main pest that affects coffee crops around the world, causing major economic losses and diminishing beverage quality. A mathematical model is formulated, from the perspective of the Adaptive Dynamics (AD) framework, to describe the evolution of coffee quality as a continuous differentiating attribute related to the mix of healthy and bored coffee. The study involves three stages: first, an agro-ecological model describes coffee production and growth of the CBB population prior to the processing of different qualities of coffee; second, a market model describes the competition between different blends of standard and special coffee; finally, the AD canonical equation is derived to describe the evolution of coffee quality resulting from innovations in the quality attribute filtered by market competition. Interestingly, AD allows to derive conditions for the emergence of diversity, i.e., the establishment of a second type of coffee that coexists with the former and, similarly, for subsequent branching in the quality attributes. The full model provides insights on the impact of CBB control strategies on the long-term market structure. Specifically, a strong control aimed at increasing coffee quality may impoverish the market diversity, independently of the consumers’ budget limitations and corresponding preference for either high or low quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Hernán Darío Toro-Zapata & Carlos Andrés Trujillo-Salazar & Fabio Dercole & Gerard Olivar-Tost, 2021. "Coffee Berry Borer (Hypothenemus hampei) and its role in the evolutionary diversification of the coffee market," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 1029-1063, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:joevec:v:31:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s00191-020-00713-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s00191-020-00713-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00191-020-00713-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00191-020-00713-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. U. Dieckmann & R. Law, 1996. "The Dynamical Theory of Coevolution: A Derivation from Stochastic Ecological Processes," Working Papers wp96001, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    2. Hernán Darío Toro-Zapata & Gerard Olivar-Tost & Fabio Dercole, 2018. "Conditions on the Energy Market Diversification from Adaptive Dynamics," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-15, September.
    3. Pier Paolo Saviotti, 2001. "special issue: Variety, growth and demand," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 119-142.
    4. Johansson, Jacob & Ripa, Jörgen & Kuckländer, Nina, 2010. "The risk of competitive exclusion during evolutionary branching: Effects of resource variability, correlation and autocorrelation," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 77(2), pages 95-104.
    5. Rodríguez, Daniel & Cure, José Ricardo & Gutierrez, Andrew Paul & Cotes, José Miguel, 2017. "A coffee agroecosystem model: III. Parasitoids of the coffee berry borer (Hypothenemus hampei)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 363(C), pages 96-110.
    6. M. Doebeli & U. Dieckmann, 2000. "Evolutionary Branching and Sympatric Speciation Caused by Different Types of Ecological Interactions," Working Papers ir00040, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    7. Dercole, Fabio & Prieu, Charlotte & Rinaldi, Sergio, 2010. "Technological change and fisheries sustainability: The point of view of Adaptive Dynamics," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(3), pages 379-387.
    8. Pier P. Saviotti, 1996. "Technological Evolution, Variety and the Economy," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 727.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hernán Darío Toro-Zapata & Gerard Olivar-Tost, 2018. "Mathematical Model For The Evolutionary Dynamic Of Innovation In City Public Transport Systems," Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 7(2), pages 77-98.
    2. Frenken, Koen & Pyka, Andreas & Verspagen, Bart & Windrum, Paul, 2010. "Innovation, qualitative change and economic development--Special issue in honour of Pier-Paolo Saviotti," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 1-4, March.
    3. Cressman, Ross & Hofbauer, Josef & Riedel, Frank, 2005. "Stability of the Replicator Equation for a Single-Species with a Multi-Dimensional Continuous Trait Space," Bonn Econ Discussion Papers 12/2005, University of Bonn, Bonn Graduate School of Economics (BGSE).
    4. Krafft, Jackie, 2004. "Entry, exit and knowledge: evidence from a cluster in the info-communications industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(10), pages 1687-1706, December.
    5. Muhammad Nadeem Javaid & Pier-Paolo Saviotti, 2013. "Financial System and Technological Catching-up: an Empirical Analysis," Economic Complexity and Evolution, in: Andreas Pyka & Esben Sloth Andersen (ed.), Long Term Economic Development, edition 127, pages 461-483, Springer.
    6. Svardal, Hannes & Rueffler, Claus & Hermisson, Joachim, 2015. "A general condition for adaptive genetic polymorphism in temporally and spatially heterogeneous environments," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 76-97.
    7. Johansson, Jacob & Ripa, Jörgen & Kuckländer, Nina, 2010. "The risk of competitive exclusion during evolutionary branching: Effects of resource variability, correlation and autocorrelation," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 77(2), pages 95-104.
    8. Fusari, Angelo, 2016. "A New Economics for Modern Dynamic Economies," MPRA Paper 74008, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2016.
    9. Saviotti, Pier Paolo & Pyka, Andreas, 2004. "Economic development, qualitative change and employment creation," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 265-287, September.
    10. Dercole, Fabio & Della Rossa, Fabio, 2017. "A deterministic eco-genetic model for the short-term evolution of exploited fish stocks," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 343(C), pages 80-100.
    11. Witt, Ulrich, 2010. "Symbolic consumption and the social construction of product characteristics," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 17-25, March.
    12. Kortessis, Nicholas & Chesson, Peter, 2021. "Character displacement in the presence of multiple trait differences: Evolution of the storage effect in germination and growth," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 54-66.
    13. Pier-Paolo Saviotti & Andreas Pyka¤ & Bogang Jun, 2020. "Diversification, structural change, and economic development," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 30(5), pages 1301-1335, November.
    14. Anuraag Bukkuri & Joel S. Brown, 2021. "Evolutionary Game Theory: Darwinian Dynamics and the G Function Approach," Games, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-19, September.
    15. Gianfranco Giulioni, 2011. "The product innovation process and GDP dynamics," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 595-618, October.
    16. José Camacho Mateu & Matteo Sireci & Miguel A Muñoz, 2021. "Phenotypic-dependent variability and the emergence of tolerance in bacterial populations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(9), pages 1-28, September.
    17. Troost, T.A. & Kooi, B.W. & Kooijman, S.A.L.M., 2007. "Bifurcation analysis of ecological and evolutionary processes in ecosystems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 204(1), pages 253-268.
    18. Zu, Jian & Wang, Jinliang, 2013. "Adaptive evolution of attack ability promotes the evolutionary branching of predator species," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 12-23.
    19. Nurmi, Tuomas & Parvinen, Kalle, 2008. "On the evolution of specialization with a mechanistic underpinning in structured metapopulations," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 73(2), pages 222-243.
    20. Nassar, Elma & Pardoux, Etienne, 2019. "Small jumps asymptotic of the moving optimum Poissonian SDE," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 129(7), pages 2320-2340.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Adaptive dynamics; Evolutionary branching; Coffee market; Market diversification; Coffee berry borer; Basic-reproduction-number;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C6 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:joevec:v:31:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s00191-020-00713-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.