IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jlabre/v30y2009i3p245-261.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Arbitrators Use Just Cause Standards in Deciding Discharge and Discipline Cases? A Test

Author

Listed:
  • David Dilts

    ()

  • James Moore

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • David Dilts & James Moore, 2009. "Do Arbitrators Use Just Cause Standards in Deciding Discharge and Discipline Cases? A Test," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 245-261, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jlabre:v:30:y:2009:i:3:p:245-261
    DOI: 10.1007/s12122-009-9065-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s12122-009-9065-6
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carbonneau, Real & Laframboise, Kevin & Vahidov, Rustam, 2008. "Application of machine learning techniques for supply chain demand forecasting," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(3), pages 1140-1154, February.
    2. Chi Mint Tam & Thomas Tong & K. K. Chan, 2006. "Rough set theory for distilling construction safety measures," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(11), pages 1199-1206.
    3. Eisenbeis, Robert A, 1977. "Pitfalls in the Application of Discriminant Analysis in Business, Finance, and Economics," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 32(3), pages 875-900, June.
    4. Geng Cui & Man Leung Wong & Hon-Kwong Lui, 2006. "Machine Learning for Direct Marketing Response Models: Bayesian Networks with Evolutionary Programming," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(4), pages 597-612, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Arbitration; Just cause; Discharge; Discipline;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jlabre:v:30:y:2009:i:3:p:245-261. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla) or (Rebekah McClure). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.