IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jknowl/v16y2025i3d10.1007_s13132-024-02345-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effects of Social Capital, the Sharing Economy, and Mutual Support on the Co-housing Intentions of Elderly Groups—Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Wen-chih Yeh

    (HungKuo Delin University of Technology)

  • Chun-chang Lee

    (National Pingtung University)

  • Miao-Fen Lin

    (National Pingtung University)

  • Hung-chung Chang

    (Chihlee University of Technology)

Abstract

The aging of the population and low birth rates are two major social issues worldwide and are particularly prominent in Taiwan. Co-housing, which has been implemented in Europe, the USA, and Japan for several years, is often regarded as a solution for housing elderly groups. This study integrated the theory of planned behavior with three variables—social capital, the sharing economy, and mutual support—to explore the co-housing intentions of elderly groups. The data were analyzed using structural equation modeling. The questionnaire survey method was employed for data collection, and 335 responses were recovered. The empirical results indicated that social capital and the sharing economy indirectly and significantly affect co-housing intentions, with attitudes serving as a mediator variable. Furthermore, perceived behavioral control had a significant positive effect on co-housing intentions. The results imply that social capital and the sharing economy are important determinants in the decisions of elderly groups regarding whether to co-live with younger generations.

Suggested Citation

  • Wen-chih Yeh & Chun-chang Lee & Miao-Fen Lin & Hung-chung Chang, 2025. "The Effects of Social Capital, the Sharing Economy, and Mutual Support on the Co-housing Intentions of Elderly Groups—Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(3), pages 11952-11978, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:16:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s13132-024-02345-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s13132-024-02345-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13132-024-02345-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13132-024-02345-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Armstrong, J. Scott & Overton, Terry S., 1977. "Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys," MPRA Paper 81694, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Pilar Monton & Luisa-Eugenia Reyes & Carlos-María Alcover, 2022. "Personal Characteristics for Successful Senior Cohousing: A Proposed Theoretical Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-13, February.
    3. Katja Rusinovic & Marianne van Bochove & Jolien van de Sande, 2019. "Senior Co-Housing in the Netherlands: Benefits and Drawbacks for Its Residents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-12, October.
    4. Belk, Russell, 2014. "You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(8), pages 1595-1600.
    5. Anne Labit & Nathalie Dubost, 2016. "Housing and ageing in France and Germany: the intergenerational solution," Post-Print hal-01714055, HAL.
    6. Koen Frenken, 2017. "Political Economies and Environmental Futures for the Sharing Economy," Innovation Studies Utrecht (ISU) working paper series 17-01, Utrecht University, Department of Innovation Studies, revised Feb 2017.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tünde Zita Kovács & Forest David & Adrián Nagy & István Szűcs & András Nábrádi, 2021. "An Analysis of the Demand-Side, Platform-Based Collaborative Economy: Creation of a Clear Classification Taxonomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-20, March.
    2. S. Mahmuda & T. Sigler & E. Knight & J. Corcoran, 2020. "Sectoral evolution and shifting service delivery models in the sharing economy," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(2), pages 663-684, July.
    3. Yuya Mitake & Atsuto Nagayama & Yusuke Tsutsui & Yoshiki Shimomura, 2022. "Exploring Motivations and Barriers to Participate in Skill-Sharing Service: Insights from Case Study in Western Part of Tokyo," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-21, April.
    4. Gyódi Kristóf, 2017. "Airbnb and the Hotel Industry in Warsaw: An Example of the Sharing Economy?," Central European Economic Journal, Sciendo, vol. 2(49), pages 23-34, December.
    5. Dabbous, Amal & Tarhini, Abbas, 2019. "Assessing the impact of knowledge and perceived economic benefits on sustainable consumption through the sharing economy: A sociotechnical approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    6. María Rosalía Vicente & Carlos Gil-de-Gómez, 2021. "Exploring the Motivations of Suppliers in the Collaborative Economy: A Sustainability Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-11, February.
    7. Chameroy, Fabienne & Salgado, Stéphane & de Barnier, Virginie & Chaney, Damien, 2024. "In platform we trust: How interchangeability affects trust decisions in collaborative consumption," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    8. Chan Liu & Raymond K. H. Chan & Maofu Wang & Zhe Yang, 2020. "Mapping the Sharing Economy in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-19, August.
    9. Samira Iran & Martin Müller, 2020. "Social Innovations for Sustainable Consumption and Their Perceived Sustainability Effects in Tehran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-25, September.
    10. Sutherland, Will & Jarrahi, Mohammad Hossein, 2018. "The sharing economy and digital platforms: A review and research agenda," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 328-341.
    11. Pang, Chen & Li, Gang & Jiang, Li, 2023. "Leveraging strategic consumer behavior in consumer-to-consumer resale: From economic and environmental perspectives," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    12. Piotr Zmyślony & Grzegorz Leszczyński & Anna Waligóra & Wiesław Alejziak, 2020. "The Sharing Economy and Sustainability of Urban Destinations in the (Over)tourism Context: The Social Capital Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-26, March.
    13. Adrien Querbes, 2018. "Banned from the sharing economy: an agent-based model of a peer-to-peer marketplace for consumer goods and services," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 633-665, August.
    14. Meisam Ranjbari & Gustavo Morales-Alonso & Ruth Carrasco-Gallego, 2018. "Conceptualizing the Sharing Economy through Presenting a Comprehensive Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-24, July.
    15. Stéphanie Nguyen & Sylvie Llosa, 2018. "On The Difficulty To Define The Sharing Economy And Collaborative Consumption – Literature Review And Proposing A Different Approach With The Introduction Of 'Collaborative Services'
      [De La Difficu      ," Working Papers halshs-01820276, HAL.
    16. Rong, Ke & Sun, Hui & Li, Dun & Zhou, Di, 2021. "Matching as Service Provision of Sharing Economy Platforms: An Information Processing Perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    17. Carson Duan, 2023. "A State-of-the-Art Review of Sharing Economy Business Models and a Forecast of Future Research Directions for Sustainable Development: A Bibliometric Analysis Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-37, March.
    18. Ana Catarina Delgado & Raquel Reis Soares & João F. Proença, 2023. "Motivations for Peer-to-Peer Accommodation: Exploring Sustainable Choices in Collaborative Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-11, June.
    19. Olga Lingaitienė & Virginija Grybaitė & Aurelija Burinskienė, 2022. "Core Elements Affecting Sharing Evidence from the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, March.
    20. Boons, Frank & Bocken, Nancy, 2018. "Towards a sharing economy – Innovating ecologies of business models," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 40-52.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jknowl:v:16:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s13132-024-02345-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.