IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i13p10276-d1182315.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Motivations for Peer-to-Peer Accommodation: Exploring Sustainable Choices in Collaborative Consumption

Author

Listed:
  • Ana Catarina Delgado

    (Faculty of Economics, University of Porto, 4200-464 Porto, Portugal)

  • Raquel Reis Soares

    (Instituto Português de Administração de Marketing—IPAM Porto, Rua Manuel Pinto de Azevedo, 748, 4100-320 Porto, Portugal
    CinTurs—Research Centre for Tourism, Sustainability and Well-Being, Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal)

  • João F. Proença

    (Faculty of Economics, University of Porto, 4200-464 Porto, Portugal
    ADVANCE/CSG—Advanced Research in Management (Research Center in Management Integrated at the CSG—Research Center in Social Sciences and Management), ISEG—Lisbon School of Economics and Management, University of Lisbon, 1200-078 Lisbon, Portugal)

Abstract

This research aims to contribute to the growing body of knowledge of Collaborative Consumption (CC) by exploring the motivations that influence the use of Peer-to-Peer (P2P) accommodation platforms from the demand side. There has been a significant increase in interest in sustainable choices regarding P2P accommodation in recent years. To address this gap and contribute to the collaborative consumption and P2P accommodation theory, a quantitative study was conducted through a survey yielding 235 responses from both users and non-users of P2P platforms. The findings of this study suggest that P2P accommodation platform usage is influenced by multiple factors, including sustainability, belonging, economic benefits, and convenience. Interestingly, the study also found that individuals with higher levels of academic qualifications are more likely to adopt this mode of consumption. Moreover, the study is the first of its kind to quantitatively address this topic. By understanding the motivations of P2P platform users, policymakers and practitioners can develop targeted strategies to promote sustainable choices in this sector. Overall, this study provides a useful framework for future research on collaborative consumption and sustainable P2P accommodation.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana Catarina Delgado & Raquel Reis Soares & João F. Proença, 2023. "Motivations for Peer-to-Peer Accommodation: Exploring Sustainable Choices in Collaborative Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-11, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10276-:d:1182315
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10276/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10276/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert Koopman & Zhi Wang & Shang-Jin Wei, 2014. "Tracing Value-Added and Double Counting in Gross Exports," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(2), pages 459-494, February.
    2. Ert, Eyal & Fleischer, Aliza & Magen, Nathan, 2016. "Trust and reputation in the sharing economy: The role of personal photos in Airbnb," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 62-73.
    3. Belk, Russell, 2014. "You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(8), pages 1595-1600.
    4. Martin, Chris J., 2016. "The sharing economy: A pathway to sustainability or a nightmarish form of neoliberal capitalism?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 149-159.
    5. Eunsuk Sung & Hongbum Kim & Daeho Lee, 2018. "Why Do People Consume and Provide Sharing Economy Accommodation?—A Sustainability Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, June.
    6. Dolnicar, Sara, 2019. "A review of research into paid online peer-to-peer accommodation," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 248-264.
    7. Mohamed Fathy Agina & Nadir Aliane & Osman El Sawy & Hazem Ahmed Khairy & Sameh Fayyad, 2023. "Risks in Relation to Adopting Airbnb Accommodation: The Role of Fear of COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-19, March.
    8. Milanova, Veselina & Maas, Peter, 2017. "Sharing intangibles: Uncovering individual motives for engagement in a sharing service setting," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 159-171.
    9. Kim, Eunjin & Yoon, Sungjun, 2021. "Social capital, user motivation, and collaborative consumption of online platform services," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    10. Koen Frenken, 2017. "Political Economies and Environmental Futures for the Sharing Economy," Innovation Studies Utrecht (ISU) working paper series 17-01, Utrecht University, Department of Innovation Studies, revised Feb 2017.
    11. Jieun Lee & Aybuke Nur Erdogan & Ilyoo Barry Hong, 2021. "Participation in the Sharing Economy Revisited: The Role of Culture and Social Influence on Airbnb," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-17, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuya Mitake & Atsuto Nagayama & Yusuke Tsutsui & Yoshiki Shimomura, 2022. "Exploring Motivations and Barriers to Participate in Skill-Sharing Service: Insights from Case Study in Western Part of Tokyo," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Hung-Tai Tsou & Ja-Shen Chen & Cindy Yunhsin Chou & Tzu-Wen Chen, 2019. "Sharing Economy Service Experience and Its Effects on Behavioral Intention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-25, September.
    3. Sk Abu Khalek & Anirban Chakraborty, 2023. "‘Do I share because I care?’: Investigating the factors influencing consumer's adoption of shared consumption," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5669-5685, December.
    4. Steven Kane Curtis & Matthias Lehner, 2019. "Defining the Sharing Economy for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-25, January.
    5. Sutherland, Will & Jarrahi, Mohammad Hossein, 2018. "The sharing economy and digital platforms: A review and research agenda," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 328-341.
    6. Ruggero Sainaghi & Mehmet Ali Köseoglu & Fuad Mehraliyev, 2021. "The intellectual structure of the sharing economy," Tourism Economics, , vol. 27(5), pages 1137-1156, August.
    7. Ethem Ilbiz & Christian Kaunert, 2022. "Sharing Economy for Tackling Crypto-Laundering: The Europol Associated ‘Global Conference on Criminal Finances and Cryptocurrencies’," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-15, May.
    8. Venkateswaran, Viswanathan & S Kumar, Deepak & Gupta, Deepak, 2021. "‘To Trust or Not’: Impact of camouflage strategies on trust in the sharing economy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 110-126.
    9. Panniello, Umberto & Natalicchio, Angelo & Ardito, Lorenzo & Messeni Petruzzelli, Antonio, 2024. "A cross-sector exploration of the barriers to customer satisfaction in the sharing economy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    10. Meisam Ranjbari & Gustavo Morales-Alonso & Ruth Carrasco-Gallego, 2018. "Conceptualizing the Sharing Economy through Presenting a Comprehensive Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-24, July.
    11. Hossain, Mokter & Mozahem, Najib Ali, 2022. "Drivers’ perceptions of the sharing economy for transport services," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    12. Stéphanie Nguyen & Sylvie Llosa, 2018. "On The Difficulty To Define The Sharing Economy And Collaborative Consumption – Literature Review And Proposing A Different Approach With The Introduction Of 'Collaborative Services'
      [De La Difficu      ," Working Papers halshs-01820276, HAL.
    13. Quan Xiao & Shanshan Wan & Fucai Lu & Shun Li, 2019. "Risk Assessment for Engagement in Sharing Economy of Manufacturing Enterprises: A Matter–Element Extension Based Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-29, September.
    14. Jianjia He & Thi Hoai Thuong Mai, 2021. "The Circular Economy: A Study on the Use of Airbnb for Sustainable Coastal Development in the Vietnam Mekong Delta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-18, July.
    15. Schneckenberg, Dirk & Roth, Steffen & Velamuri, Vivek K., 2023. "Deparadoxification and value focus in sharing ventures: Concealing paradoxes in strategic decision-making," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    16. Thomas Clauss & Peter Harengel & Marianne Hock, 2019. "The perception of value of platform-based business models in the sharing economy: determining the drivers of user loyalty," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 605-634, June.
    17. Tünde Zita Kovács & Forest David & Adrián Nagy & István Szűcs & András Nábrádi, 2021. "An Analysis of the Demand-Side, Platform-Based Collaborative Economy: Creation of a Clear Classification Taxonomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-20, March.
    18. Moriuchi, Emi, 2023. "Encouraging Respect?: Understanding consumers’ perspective on the two-way evaluation system in a sharing economy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    19. Rong, Ke & Sun, Hui & Li, Dun & Zhou, Di, 2021. "Matching as Service Provision of Sharing Economy Platforms: An Information Processing Perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    20. Florian Hawlitschek & Nicole Stofberg & Timm Teubner & Patrick Tu & Christof Weinhardt, 2018. "How Corporate Sharewashing Practices Undermine Consumer Trust," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-18, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10276-:d:1182315. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.