IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jcomop/v44y2022i4d10.1007_s10878-021-00723-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Principal–agent problem under the linear contract

Author

Listed:
  • Guichen Gao

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences)

  • Xinxin Han

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences)

  • Li Ning

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences)

  • Hing-Fung Ting

    (The University of Hong Kong)

  • Yong Zhang

    (Chinese Academy of Sciences)

Abstract

We consider a classical principal–agent model in the contract theory. A principal designs the payment $$\mathbf {w}=\left\{ w_{0},w_{1},\ldots ,w_{n}\right\} $$ w = w 0 , w 1 , … , w n to incentivize the agent to enter into the contract. Given the payment $$\mathbf {w}$$ w , the agent will take hidden actions from her strategy set $$\mathbf {S_{t}^{n}}$$ S t n to finish it and from the perspective of the agent, she will select the best strategy to maximize her expected utility. Due to the hidden strategy set, the principal obtains the expected revenue $$R(S_{t}^{n})$$ R ( S t n ) from the agent. Furthermore, the principal has a non-decreasing revenue function r(k), which is common information, where k is the number of successful tasks in the total n independent tasks. The objective of the problem is to maximize the principal’s expected profit, i.e., $$\max _{S,\mathbf {w}}\left\{ R(S_{t}^{n})-P(S_{t}^{n},\mathbf {w})\right\} $$ max S , w R ( S t n ) - P ( S t n , w ) , where $$P(S_{t}^{n},\mathbf {w})$$ P ( S t n , w ) is the agent’s expected payment. The difficulty of this problem is due to the asymmetric information. If the principal knows all the information about the agent, then the optimal contract can be solved by linear programming. Based on Dütting et al. (in: Proceedings of the EC, pp 369–387, 2019), we consider the more general model. When information is asymmetric, we further analyze that the approximation ratio of the linear contract can reach $$(1-\alpha _{N})/(1-\alpha _{N}^{N})$$ ( 1 - α N ) / ( 1 - α N N ) , which improves the results of Dütting et al. (in: Proceedings of the EC, pp 369–387, 2019), where $$\alpha _{N}\in [0,1)$$ α N ∈ [ 0 , 1 ) is a given constant and the coefficient of the linear contract.

Suggested Citation

  • Guichen Gao & Xinxin Han & Li Ning & Hing-Fung Ting & Yong Zhang, 2022. "Principal–agent problem under the linear contract," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 2286-2301, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:44:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s10878-021-00723-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10878-021-00723-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10878-021-00723-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10878-021-00723-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bichler, Martin & Paulsen, Per, 2018. "A principal-agent model of bidding firms in multi-unit auctions," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 20-40.
    2. Singham, D.I., 2019. "Sample average approximation for the continuous type principal-agent problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(3), pages 1050-1057.
    3. Jakša Cvitanić & Dylan Possamaï & Nizar Touzi, 2018. "Dynamic programming approach to principal–agent problems," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 1-37, January.
    4. Grant, Simon & Jude Kline, J. & Quiggin, John, 2018. "Contracting under uncertainty: A principal–agent model with ambiguity averse parties," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 582-597.
    5. Corgnet, Brice & Gómez-Miñambres, Joaquín & Hernán-González, Roberto, 2018. "Goal setting in the principal–agent model: Weak incentives for strong performance," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 311-326.
    6. Schosser, Josef, 2019. "Consistency between principal and agent with differing time horizons: Computing incentives under risk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(3), pages 1113-1123.
    7. Ross, Stephen A, 1973. "The Economic Theory of Agency: The Principal's Problem," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 63(2), pages 134-139, May.
    8. Gabriel Carroll, 2015. "Robustness and Linear Contracts," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(2), pages 536-563, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martin Dumav, 2021. "Moral Hazard, Dynamic Incentives, and Ambiguous Perceptions," Papers 2110.15229, arXiv.org.
    2. Eduardo Abi Jaber & Stéphane Villeneuve, 2022. "Gaussian Agency problems with memory and Linear Contracts," Working Papers hal-03783062, HAL.
    3. Alon Cohen & Moran Koren & Argyrios Deligkas, 2018. "Learning Approximately Optimal Contracts," Papers 1811.06736, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2022.
    4. Modibo Camara & Jason Hartline & Aleck Johnsen, 2020. "Mechanisms for a No-Regret Agent: Beyond the Common Prior," Papers 2009.05518, arXiv.org.
    5. Villeneuve, Stéphane & Abi Jaber, Eduardo, 2022. "Gaussian Agency problems with memory and Linear Contracts," TSE Working Papers 22-1363, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    6. Eduardo Abi Jaber & Stéphane Villeneuve, 2022. "Gaussian Agency problems with memory and Linear Contracts," Post-Print hal-03783062, HAL.
    7. Camilo Hern'andez & Dylan Possamai, 2023. "Time-inconsistent contract theory," Papers 2303.01601, arXiv.org.
    8. Eduardo Abi Jaber & St'ephane Villeneuve, 2022. "Gaussian Agency problems with memory and Linear Contracts," Papers 2209.10878, arXiv.org.
    9. Xin Qu & Majella Percy & Fang Hu & Jenny Stewart, 2022. "Can CEO equity‐based compensation limit investment‐related agency problems?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(2), pages 2579-2614, June.
    10. Maria del Mar Miras & Bernabe Escobar & Amalia Carrasco, 2014. "Are Spanish Listed Firms Betting on CSR during the Crisis? Evidence from the Agency Problem," Business and Management Research, Business and Management Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 3(1), pages 85-95, March.
    11. Ece ZEYBEK YILMAZ & Göksel ATAMAN BERK, 2020. "Vekâlet Kuramına Göre Türkiye’deki Otellerin Pazara Giriş Stratejilerinin Değerlendirilmesi," Istanbul Management Journal, Istanbul University Business School, vol. 0(88), pages 145-168, June.
    12. Ndayisaba, Gilbert A. & Ahmed, Abdullahi D., 2021. "Demystifying the paradoxical popularity of stock buybacks in a market environment characterised by high stock prices," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    13. Thaler, Richard H & Shefrin, H M, 1981. "An Economic Theory of Self-Control," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 89(2), pages 392-406, April.
    14. Andrés Fioriti & Allan Hernandez-Chanto, 2022. "Leveling the Playing Field for Risk-Averse Agents in Security-Bid Auctions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(7), pages 5441-5463, July.
    15. Bernhardt, Dan & Koufopoulos, Kostas & Trigilia, Giulio, 2022. "Separating equilibria, underpricing and security design," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(3), pages 788-801.
    16. Martin Gaynor, 1994. "Issues in the Industrial Organization of the Market for Physician Services," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 3(1), pages 211-255, March.
    17. Lehn, Kenneth, 2021. "Corporate governance and corporate agility," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    18. Damon Clark & David Gill & Victoria Prowse & Mark Rush, 2020. "Using Goals to Motivate College Students: Theory and Evidence From Field Experiments," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 102(4), pages 648-663, October.
    19. Philip R. P. Coelho & James E. McClure & John A. Spry, 2003. "The Social Responsibility of Corporate Management: A Classical Critique," American Journal of Business, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(1), pages 15-24, April.
    20. Boudreaux, Christopher, 2019. "Do private enterprises outperform state enterprises in an emerging market? The importance of institutional context in entrepreneurship," MPRA Paper 93039, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jcomop:v:44:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s10878-021-00723-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.