IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/jagbes/v29y2024i2d10.1007_s13253-023-00566-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clustered and Unclustered Group Testing for Biosecurity

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Graham Clark

    (Australian National University)

  • Belinda Barnes

    (Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences)

  • Mahdi Parsa

    (Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences)

Abstract

Group testing is an important element of biosecurity operations, designed to efficiently reduce the risk of introducing exotic pests and pathogens with imported agricultural products. Groups of units, such as seeds, are selected from a consignment and tested for contamination, with a positive or negative test returned for each group. These schemes are usually designed such that the probability of detecting contamination is high assuming random mixing and a somewhat arbitrary design prevalence. We propose supplementing this approach with an assessment of the distribution of the number of contaminated units conditional on testing results. We develop beta-binomial models that allow for between-consignment variability in contamination levels, as well as including beta random effects to allow for possible clustering within the groups for testing. The latent beta distributions can be considered as priors and chosen based on expert judgement, or estimated from historical test results. We show that the parameter representing within-group clustering is, unsurprisingly, effectively non-identifiable. Sensitivity analysis can be conducted by investigating the consequences of assuming different values of this parameter. We also demonstrate theoretically and empirically that the estimated probability of a consignment containing contamination and evading detection is almost perfectly robust to mis-specification of the clustering parameter. We apply the new models to large cucurbit seed lots imported into Australia where they provide important new insights on the level of undetected contamination. Supplementary materials accompanying this paper appear on-line.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Graham Clark & Belinda Barnes & Mahdi Parsa, 2024. "Clustered and Unclustered Group Testing for Biosecurity," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 29(2), pages 193-211, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:jagbes:v:29:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s13253-023-00566-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s13253-023-00566-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13253-023-00566-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13253-023-00566-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sylvie Bonny, 2017. "Corporate Concentration and Technological Change in the Global Seed Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-25, September.
    2. Aiyi Liu & Chunling Liu & Zhiwei Zhang & Paul S. Albert, 2012. "Optimality of group testing in the presence of misclassification," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 99(1), pages 245-251.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rohe, Sebastian & Oltmer, Marie & Wolter, Hendrik & Gmeiner, Nina & Tschersich , Julia, 2022. "Forever Niche: Why do organic vegetable varieties not diffuse?," Papers in Innovation Studies 2022/8, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    2. Xianzheng Huang & Md Shamim Sarker Warasi, 2017. "Maximum Likelihood Estimators in Regression Models for Error-prone Group Testing Data," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 44(4), pages 918-931, December.
    3. Lea Kliem, 2024. "Strengthening agroecological resilience through commons-based seed governance in the Philippines," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 5367-5399, February.
    4. Lipnowski, Elliot & Ravid, Doron, 2021. "Pooled testing for quarantine decisions," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    5. Graham Hepworth & Brad J. Biggerstaff, 2021. "Bias Correction in Estimating Proportions by Imperfect Pooled Testing," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 26(1), pages 90-104, March.
    6. Joshua M. Tebbs & Christopher S. McMahan & Christopher R. Bilder, 2013. "Two-Stage Hierarchical Group Testing for Multiple Infections with Application to the Infertility Prevention Project," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(4), pages 1064-1073, December.
    7. Richard Volpe & Maiah Alman & Xiaowei Cai & Alexander Stevens, 2022. "Retail Mergers and Acquisitions, and Specialty Crop Producers: Evidence from California," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-13, March.
    8. Xiong, Wenjun & Ding, Juan, 2015. "Robust procedures for experimental design in group testing considering misclassification," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 35-41.
    9. Kliem, Lea & Sagebiel, Julian, 2023. "Consumers' preferences for commons-based and open-source produce: A discrete choice experiment with directional information manipulations," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    10. Marin, Anabel & Stubrin, Lilia & van Zwanenberg, Patrick, 2023. "Technological lock-in in action: Appraisal and policy commitment in Argentina's seed sector," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(2).
    11. Richard D. Smart & Amer Ait Sidhoum & Johannes Sauer, 2022. "Decomposition of efficiency in the global seed industry: A nonparametric approach," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(6), pages 2133-2147, September.
    12. Tarun Jain & Bijendra Nath Jain, 2021. "Infection Testing at Scale: An Examination of Pooled Testing Diagnostics," Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, , vol. 46(1), pages 13-26, March.
    13. Jennifer Clapp & Indra Noyes & Zachary Grant, 2021. "The Food Systems Summit’s Failure to Address Corporate Power," Development, Palgrave Macmillan;Society for International Deveopment, vol. 64(3), pages 192-198, December.
    14. Karolina Ratajczak & Hanna Sulewska & Katarzyna Panasiewicz & Agnieszka Faligowska & Grażyna Szymańska, 2023. "Phytostimulator Application after Cold Stress for Better Maize ( Zea mays L.) Plant Recovery," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, February.
    15. Md S. Warasi & Laura L. Hungerford & Kevin Lahmers, 2022. "Optimizing Pooled Testing for Estimating the Prevalence of Multiple Diseases," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 27(4), pages 713-727, December.
    16. Nguyen, Ngoc T. & Bish, Ebru K. & Bish, Douglas R., 2021. "Optimal pooled testing design for prevalence estimation under resource constraints," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    17. Shih-Hao Huang & Mong-Na Lo Huang & Kerby Shedden & Weng Kee Wong, 2017. "Optimal group testing designs for estimating prevalence with uncertain testing errors," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 79(5), pages 1547-1563, November.
    18. Karime Chahuán-Jiménez & Rolando Rubilar-Torrealba & Hanns de la Fuente-Mella & Claudio Elórtegui-Gómez, 2023. "Unraveling the Complex Interplay of Sustainability, Investments, and Economic Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-15, December.
    19. Stefanie Sievers-Glotzbach & Anja Christinck, 2021. "Introduction to the symposium: seed as a commons—exploring innovative concepts and practices of governing seed and varieties," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 38(2), pages 499-507, June.
    20. Seyed H. Hosseini & Richard Gray & Mohammad Torshizi, 2019. "Cross‐licensing agreements in presence of technological improvements," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 67(1), pages 115-130, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:jagbes:v:29:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s13253-023-00566-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.