IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/infosf/v26y2024i3d10.1007_s10796-023-10417-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Framework of Environmental, Personal, and Behavioral Factors of Adult Learning in Online Communities of Practice

Author

Listed:
  • Adam Abedini

    (Macquarie University)

  • Babak Abedin

    (Macquarie University)

  • Didar Zowghi

    (CSIRO’s Data61)

Abstract

Adult learning is a complex phenomenon that takes place over an adult’s lifetime and is not limited to a particular age. It includes a set of activities to enhance life through improving skills, knowledge and capabilities. The foundational theories of adult learning, such as andragogy theory, place the individual adult centre stage and differentiate adult learning from formal learning. They also shift the focus from the individuals to the environment in which adult learning takes place. In line with this movement, online communities of practice (OCOPs) have evolved from being considered as online environments for learning to specialised forums that allow practitioners to collaborate around a project of mutual interest. The principles of adult learning are directly applicable to engagement in OCOPs because they include practical methods founded on the belief that adults are self-directed, autonomous learners and that learning is most effective when the environment plays the role of a facilitator, rather than being just a supportive and traditional setting for learning. However, how individual adults engage in OCOPs and benefit from them is not well understood. This paper draws on social cognitive theory to examine: how environmental, personal and behavioural factors shape engagement in OCOPs. To answer this question, twenty-one interviews were conducted with members of GitHub, a large online community of practice for IT professionals. The findings revealed that adults’ engagement in OCOPs involves project-based activities on mutual interests and willingness to help others. The findings also show that engaging in online communities does not only satisfy intrinsic, well-defined, expected outcomes and shape adults’ engagement, but also has an impact on adults’ lifelong learning achievements, such as professional experience and credit recognition. Based on these findings, a revised framework for adults’ engagement in OCOPs is presented and discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Adam Abedini & Babak Abedin & Didar Zowghi, 2024. "A Framework of Environmental, Personal, and Behavioral Factors of Adult Learning in Online Communities of Practice," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 1201-1218, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:26:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s10796-023-10417-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10796-023-10417-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10796-023-10417-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10796-023-10417-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Panigrahi, Ritanjali & Srivastava, Praveen Ranjan & Sharma, Dheeraj, 2018. "Online learning: Adoption, continuance, and learning outcome—A review of literature," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 1-14.
    2. Vrana, Scott R. & Vrana, Dylan T. & Penner, Louis A. & Eggly, Susan & Slatcher, Richard B. & Hagiwara, Nao, 2018. "Latent Semantic Analysis: A new measure of patient-physician communication," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 22-26.
    3. Lee, Yeonjin & Jean Yeung, Wei-Jun, 2019. "Gender matters: Productive social engagement and the subsequent cognitive changes among older adults," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 87-95.
    4. Hutchison, Paul D. & Daigle, Ronald J. & George, Benjamin, 2018. "Application of latent semantic analysis in AIS academic research," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 83-96.
    5. Rajasulochana, Subramania Raju & Senthil Ganesh, S., 2019. "Is assessing learning outcomes a trade-off in experiential learning? Integrating field visit with managerial economics course," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 1-1.
    6. Libo Li & Frank Goethals & Bart Baesens & Monique Snoeck, 2017. "Predicting software revision outcomes on GitHub using structural holes theory," Post-Print hal-01667387, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dwi Prasetyanto & Muhamad Rizki & Yos Sunitiyoso, 2022. "Online Learning Participation Intention after COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia: Do Students Still Make Trips for Online Class?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Zijian Zhang & Yinghao Lin & Xiaoyuan Wang & Xin Zhang, 2024. "Pathways to Resilient and Sustainable Online Education in the New Normal: Interpreting University Teachers’ Willingness to Use Online Teaching Platforms Consistently," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-20, November.
    3. López, Rafael & Valarezo, Ángel & Pérez-Amaral, Teodosio, 2023. "Unleashing the potential of online learning in Spain: An econometric analysis," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(6).
    4. Renjie Song & Yaru Zheng, 2024. "Predicting Continuance Intention to Use Learning Management Systems among Undergraduates: The Moderating Effect of Intrinsic Motivation," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, August.
    5. Cunqi Han & Liqun Liu & Siyu Chen, 2022. "Factors Influencing Parents’ Intention on Primary School Students’ Choices of Online Learning during and after the COVID-19 Pandemic in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-23, July.
    6. Alvin Chung Man Leung & Radhika Santhanam & Ron Chi-Wai Kwok & Wei Thoo Yue, 2023. "Could Gamification Designs Enhance Online Learning Through Personalization? Lessons from a Field Experiment," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 27-49, March.
    7. Xi, Nannan & Hamari, Juho, 2019. "Does gamification satisfy needs? A study on the relationship between gamification features and intrinsic need satisfaction," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 210-221.
    8. Fu, Liping & Wang, Ruizhen & He, Chaoying, 2025. "Gender differences in later life: Labor supply responses to spousal disability," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 366(C).
    9. Thamsanqa Keith Miya & Irene Govender, 2022. "UX/UI design of online learning platforms and their impact on learning: A review," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(10), pages 316-327, December.
    10. Senave, Elseline & Jans, Mieke J. & Srivastava, Rajendra P., 2023. "The application of text mining in accounting," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    11. Liliana Pedraja-Rejas & Emilio Rodríguez-Ponce & Camila Muñoz-Fritis & David Laroze, 2023. "Online Learning and Experiences in Higher Education during COVID-19: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-21, November.
    12. Maria Toro-Troconis & Jesse Alexander & Manuel Frutos-Perez, 2019. "Assessing Student Engagement in Online Programmes: Using Learning Design and Learning Analytics," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 8(6), pages 171-171, December.
    13. Sameera Butt & Asif Mahmood & Saima Saleem & Shah Ali Murtaza & Sana Hassan & Edina Molnár, 2023. "The Contribution of Learner Characteristics and Perceived Learning to Students’ Satisfaction and Academic Performance during COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-28, January.
    14. Sameera Butt & Asif Mahmood & Saima Saleem, 2022. "The role of institutional factors and cognitive absorption on students’ satisfaction and performance in online learning during COVID 19," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(6), pages 1-30, June.
    15. Bonita Nath & Priya Patel & Mark Oremus, 2023. "The association between religious participation and memory among middle-aged and older adults: A systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(8), pages 1-15, August.
    16. Mohammed Abdullatif Almulla & Waleed Mugahed Al-Rahmi, 2023. "Integrated Social Cognitive Theory with Learning Input Factors: The Effects of Problem-Solving Skills and Critical Thinking Skills on Learning Performance Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-26, February.
    17. Seungwon Jeong & Yusuke Inoue & Katsunori Kondo & Kazushige Ide & Yasuhiro Miyaguni & Eisaku Okada & Tokunori Takeda & Toshiyuki Ojima, 2019. "Correlations between Forgetfulness and Social Participation: Community Diagnosing Indicators," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-11, July.
    18. Nik Sarina Nik Md Salleh & Nurul Nadia Abd Aziz & Noor Affeeda Ramli & Muhammad Zahran Abd Rahman & Noorazzila Shamsuddin & Hasrudy Tanjung, 2025. "The Relationship between Learning Flexibility, the Learning Environment, and Online Learning Experiences among Undergraduate Students in Malaysia," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(1), pages 2632-2641, January.
    19. Norzaidi Mohd Daud & Ezzra Natasha Ramli & Nur Ariena Atirah Atrin & Nur Atasshahazahani & Siti Khadijahannuar, 2024. "The New Educational Norm in Malaysian Universities is Online Education Worthwhile," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(8), pages 3533-3542, August.
    20. Shu-Ning Zhang & Guang-Xiu Jiang & Wen-Qi Ruan & Yong-Quan Li, 2023. "Technology External Cause or Individual Internal Cause? Multiple Ways to Improve the Online Learning Effectiveness of Tourism and Hospitality Management Students," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:infosf:v:26:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s10796-023-10417-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.