IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijsaem/v7y2016i2d10.1007_s13198-015-0408-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mission reliability estimation of mobile robot system

Author

Listed:
  • Panagiotis H. Tsarouhas

    (Technological Educational Institute of Central Macedonia)

  • George K. Fourlas

    (Technological Education Institute of Lamia)

Abstract

Reliability analysis of a mobile robot system over a period of 34 months was carried out. Most of the failure modes were identified and the descriptive statistics at component level were calculated. Several theoretical distributions were applied and the best fit of failure data was identified. Furthermore, the reliability, probability density functions and hazard rate modes for all components and the entire system were calculated. It was found out that, (a) the encoder and the tires stand for 73.8 % of all the failures of the mobile robot system, (b) for the mobile robot the time-between-failure ranges from 5 to 2128 h, and (c) the highest reliability is observed at the battery, whereas the lowest reliability is observed at the encoder. The proposed method could be a useful tool towards assessing the current conditions, and predicting reliability for improving the mobile robot maintenance policy, and for helping robot manufacturers to improve the design and operation of the system that they manufacture and operate.

Suggested Citation

  • Panagiotis H. Tsarouhas & George K. Fourlas, 2016. "Mission reliability estimation of mobile robot system," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 7(2), pages 220-228, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:7:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s13198-015-0408-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s13198-015-0408-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13198-015-0408-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13198-015-0408-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barabady, Javad & Kumar, Uday, 2008. "Reliability analysis of mining equipment: A case study of a crushing plant at Jajarm Bauxite Mine in Iran," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(4), pages 647-653.
    2. Hongzhou Wang & Hoang Pham, 2006. "Reliability and Optimal Maintenance," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, Springer, number 978-1-84628-325-3, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Asadzadeh, S.M. & Azadeh, A., 2014. "An integrated systemic model for optimization of condition-based maintenance with human error," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 117-131.
    2. Rajkumar Bhimgonda Patil & Basavraj S Kothavale & Laxman Yadu Waghmode, 2019. "Selection of time-to-failure model for computerized numerical control turning center based on the assessment of trends in maintenance data," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(2), pages 105-117, April.
    3. Hashemi, M. & Asadi, M. & Zarezadeh, S., 2020. "Optimal maintenance policies for coherent systems with multi-type components," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    4. Yuqian Xu & Lingjiong Zhu & Michael Pinedo, 2020. "Operational Risk Management: A Stochastic Control Framework with Preventive and Corrective Controls," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(6), pages 1804-1825, November.
    5. Izquierdo, J. & Márquez, A. Crespo & Uribetxebarria, J. & Erguido, A., 2020. "On the importance of assessing the operational context impact on maintenance management for life cycle cost of wind energy projects," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 1100-1110.
    6. Finkelstein, Maxim & Cha, Ji Hwan & Langston, Amy, 2023. "Improving classical optimal age-replacement policies for degrading items," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    7. Ben Mabrouk, A. & Chelbi, A. & Radhoui, M., 2016. "Optimal imperfect maintenance strategy for leased equipment," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 57-64.
    8. Ji Hwan Cha & Maxim Finkelstein, 2020. "On optimal life extension for degrading systems," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(3), pages 487-495, June.
    9. Barabadi, Abbas & Barabady, Javad & Markeset, Tore, 2014. "Application of reliability models with covariates in spare part prediction and optimization – A case study," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 1-7.
    10. Maxim Finkelstein & Ji Hwan Cha, 2022. "Reducing degradation and age of items in imperfect repair modeling," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 31(4), pages 1058-1081, December.
    11. Chengye Ma & Yongjun Du & Lijun Shang & Li Yang & Kaiye Gao, 2023. "Random Maintenance Strategy Modeling of Warranted Products with Reliability Heterogeneity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-19, September.
    12. Jarosław Brodny & Magdalena Tutak, 2019. "Analysing the Utilisation Effectiveness of Mining Machines Using Independent Data Acquisition Systems: A Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-15, June.
    13. Bouslah, B. & Gharbi, A. & Pellerin, R., 2016. "Integrated production, sampling quality control and maintenance of deteriorating production systems with AOQL constraint," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 110-126.
    14. Kartick Bhushan & Somnath Chattopadhyaya & Shubham Sharma & Kamal Sharma & Changhe Li & Yanbin Zhang & Elsayed Mohamed Tag Eldin, 2022. "Analyzing Reliability and Maintainability of Crawler Dozer BD155 Transmission Failure Using Markov Method and Total Productive Maintenance: A Novel Case Study for Improvement Productivity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-17, November.
    15. López-González, A. & Domenech, B. & Ferrer-Martí, L., 2018. "Sustainability and design assessment of rural hybrid microgrids in Venezuela," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 229-242.
    16. Hyunju Lee & Ji Hwan Cha & Maxim Finkelstein, 2022. "A Preventive Replacement Policy for a System Subject to Bivariate Generalized Polya Failure Process," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, May.
    17. Ait Mokhtar, El Hassene & Laggoune, Radouane & Chateauneuf, Alaa, 2023. "Imperfect maintenance modeling and assessment of repairable multi-component systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    18. Altındağ, Ömer & Aydoğdu, Halil, 2021. "Estimation of renewal function under progressively censored data and its applications," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    19. Nguyen, Kim-Anh & Do, Phuc & Grall, Antoine, 2017. "Joint predictive maintenance and inventory strategy for multi-component systems using Birnbaum’s structural importance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 249-261.
    20. Young Yun, Won & Nakagawa, Toshio, 2010. "Replacement and inspection policies for products with random life cycle," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 161-165.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:7:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s13198-015-0408-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.