IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ieaple/v25y2025i2d10.1007_s10784-025-09662-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) on steel decarbonization in India: a multi-stakeholder perspective on ambition vs. equity

Author

Listed:
  • Kasturi Das

    (Institute of Management Technology
    Yale University)

  • Kaushik Ranjan Bandyopadhyay

    (Indian Institute of Management)

Abstract

The European Union (EU)’s carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM), the maiden border carbon adjustment (BCA) on cross-border trade, has entered into force in October, 2023. While CBAM is aimed at preventing the risk of carbon leakage, another objective is enhancing the decarbonization in the covered hard-to-abate sectors and concomitant greenhouse gas emissions reduction in the EU’s trade partners. In this article, we examine how far CBAM could be effective in achieving the latter objective, by considering the iron and steel sector in India as a case in point. Our hypothesis is that CBAM will induce the “Brussels Effect” on steel decarbonization in India. The Brussels Effect refers to the EU’s power to transmit its own regulation beyond its border ‘unilaterally’, through an interplay between EU regulations and the market forces’ ability to externalize those regulations in different markets. We test this hypothesis by applying a qualitative research methodology that combines secondary data gathered from multiple streams of literature with primary data collected through focused group discussion and key-informant-interviews involving 41 stakeholders of diverse categories representing steel companies, industry associations, government, academia, civil society, and inter-governmental-organizations conducted between July 2023 and October 2024. Our findings indicate that the Brussels Effect on steel decarbonization in India may be valid for the big steel producers, but only partially. However, the effect may not work for the small and medium enterprises in India. Thus, the impact of CBAM on the Indian steel industry would likely be uneven and inequitable, with the larger players adapting faster and relatively more easily compared to smaller players, whose challenges may exacerbate if they are exposed to CBAM. We propose a set of design recommendations for BCAs that the EU and other prospective BCA-imposing countries could consider better balancing the ambition of enhanced decarbonization with equity in their trading partners from the Global South.

Suggested Citation

  • Kasturi Das & Kaushik Ranjan Bandyopadhyay, 2025. "Impact of carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) on steel decarbonization in India: a multi-stakeholder perspective on ambition vs. equity," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 195-229, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:ieaple:v:25:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10784-025-09662-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10784-025-09662-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10784-025-09662-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10784-025-09662-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Overland, Indra & Sabyrbekov, Rahat, 2022. "Know your opponent: Which countries might fight the European carbon border adjustment mechanism?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    2. Guilherme Magacho & Etienne Espagne & Antoine Godin, 2024. "Impacts of the CBAM on EU trade partners: consequences for developing countries," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 243-259, February.
    3. Perdana, Sigit & Vielle, Marc, 2022. "Making the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism acceptable and climate friendly for least developed countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    4. Gu, Rongrong & Guo, Ji & Huang, Yuxiang & Wu, Xianhua, 2023. "Impact of the EU carbon border adjustment mechanism on economic growth and resources supply in the BASIC countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    5. Jens Hölscher & Johannes Stephan, 2009. "Competition and Antitrust Policy in the Enlarged European Union: A Level Playing Field?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(4), pages 863-889, September.
    6. Michael Grubb, 2011. "International climate finance from border carbon cost levelling," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 1050-1057, May.
    7. Clora, Francesco & Yu, Wusheng & Corong, Erwin, 2023. "Alternative carbon border adjustment mechanisms in the European Union and international responses: Aggregate and within-coalition results," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    8. Daniele Curzi & Marsela Luarasi & Valentina Raimondi & Alessandro Olper, 2018. "The (lack of) international harmonization of EU standards: import and export effects in developed versus developing countries," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(21), pages 1552-1556, December.
    9. Michael H. Böheim & Klaus S. Friesenbichler, 2016. "Exporting the Competition Policy Regime of the European Union: Success or Failure? Empirical Evidence for Acceding Countries," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(3), pages 569-582, May.
    10. Lin, Boqiang & Zhao, Hengsong, 2023. "Evaluating current effects of upcoming EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: Evidence from China's futures market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    11. Tarr, David G. & Kuznetsov, Dmitrii E. & Overland, Indra & Vakulchuk, Roman, 2023. "Why carbon border adjustment mechanisms will not save the planet but a climate club and subsidies for transformative green technologies may," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    12. Anu Bradford & Adam Chilton & Katerina Linos & Alexander Weaver, 2019. "The Global Dominance of European Competition Law Over American Antitrust Law," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), pages 731-766, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amendola, Marco, 2025. "Winners and losers of the EU carbon border adjustment mechanism. An intra-EU issue?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    2. Chu, Long & Do, Thang Nam & Le, Thi Ha Lien & Ho, Quoc Anh & Dang, Khoi, 2024. "Carbon border adjustment mechanism, carbon pricing, and within-sector shifts: A partial equilibrium approach to Vietnam's steel sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    3. Chen, Zhe-Yi & Zhao, Lu-Tao & Cheng, Lei & Qiu, Rui-Xiang, 2025. "How does China respond to the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism? An approach of global trade analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    4. Borui Tian & Mingyue Zheng & Wenjie Liu & Yueqing Gu & Yi Xing & Chongchao Pan, 2024. "Impacts of Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism on the Development of Chinese Steel Enterprises and Government Management Decisions: A Tripartite Evolutionary Game Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-32, April.
    5. Jingzhi Zhu & Yuhuan Zhao & Lu Zheng, 2024. "The Impact of the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism on China’s Exports to the EU," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-18, January.
    6. Lin, Boqiang & Zhao, Hengsong, 2024. "Threatening the Poor? The economic impacts of carbon border adjustment mechanism on developing countries," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 582-593.
    7. Jiayi Liu & Weidong Wang & Tengfei Jiang & Huirong Ben & Jie Dai, 2025. "Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism as a Catalyst for Greenfield Investment: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms Using a Difference-in-Differences Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-21, April.
    8. Ćosić, Boris & Ban, Marko & Duić, Neven, 2025. "Impact of the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism on Electricity Trade with Energy Community Contracting Parties," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    9. Lin Yang & Zhengnan Lu & Mengsha Shen, 2025. "Research on the Effect and Path of CBAM on Green Technology Innovation in China’s High-Carbon Manufacturing Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-26, March.
    10. Constantin Johnson & Max Åhman & Lars J. Nilsson & Zhenxi Li, 2025. "Emerging green steel markets surrounding the EU emissions trading system and carbon border adjustment mechanism," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.
    11. Steinhauser Dušan & Kittová Zuzana & Khúlová Lucia, 2024. "Relationship Between CO2 Emissions and Trade: The Case of the EU," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Sciendo, vol. 59(1), pages 41-47, February.
    12. Xianting Bao & Yuran Jin, 2025. "Insight into border carbon adjustment: a visual bibliometric analysis from 2009 to 2024," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
    13. Klaus S. Friesenbichler, 2020. "Does EU-accession affect domestic market structures and firm level productivity?," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 47(2), pages 343-364, May.
    14. Sebastian Billows & Sebastian Kohl & Fabien Tarissan, 2021. "Bureaucrats or Ideologues? EU Merger Control as Market‐centred Integration," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(4), pages 762-781, July.
    15. Lu, Tinghui & Li, Xuelian & Lin, Jyh-Horng & Chang, Ching-Hui & Cai, Zhantong, 2024. "Assessing the impact of climate policies on equity risk under sustainable insurance: Cap-and-trade regulation, energy-saving technology subsidies, and carbon tariffs," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    16. Tian Lan & Ran Tao, 2024. "Research on the Inhibitory Effect of the EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism on Carbon Leakage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-21, August.
    17. Li, Wei & Liu, Xing & Lu, Can, 2023. "Analysis of China's steel response ways to EU CBAM policy based on embodied carbon intensity prediction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    18. Lin, Boqiang & Zhao, Hengsong, 2023. "Evaluating current effects of upcoming EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: Evidence from China's futures market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    19. Wifo, 2019. "WIFO-Monatsberichte, Heft 12/2019," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 92(12), December.
    20. Wang, Junbo & Ma, Zhenyu & Fan, Xiayang, 2023. "We are all in the same boat: The welfare and carbon abatement effects of the EU carbon border adjustment mechanism," MPRA Paper 118978, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ieaple:v:25:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10784-025-09662-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.