IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Postface: fragmentation, failing trust and enduring tensions over what counts as climate finance


  • J. Timmons Roberts

    () (Brown University)

  • Romain Weikmans

    (Université Libre de Bruxelles/Free University of Brussels)


Abstract The Paris Agreement commits nations in Article 2(1) to “Making finance flows consistent with a pathway towards low greenhouse gas emissions and climate-resilient development.” However there is an absence of internationally agreed accounting rules that would permit overall assessments of progress to this goal and any meaningful comparisons of performance between countries. This is true also for the quantitative Copenhagen/Cancún promise by developed nations to jointly mobilize US$100 billion by 2020. Our goal is to provoke discussion about the depth of the problems this lack of a functional definition and accounting system have created and perpetuated. We do so by describing the fragmented system of national reporting of climate finance and how the OECD’s Rio Marker system is serving neither contributors nor recipients. More than a trust issue between developed and developing countries, we argue that the lack of modalities to account for climate finance also considerably impedes the effective functioning of the bottom-up approach that now prevails under the UNFCCC. The deadline to propose "modalities of accounting climate finance" by 2018 is a crucial window in which to address this chronic issue in international climate policy.

Suggested Citation

  • J. Timmons Roberts & Romain Weikmans, 2017. "Postface: fragmentation, failing trust and enduring tensions over what counts as climate finance," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 129-137, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:ieaple:v:17:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s10784-016-9347-4 DOI: 10.1007/s10784-016-9347-4

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Michaelowa, Axel & Michaelowa, Katharina, 2011. "Coding Error or Statistical Embellishment? The Political Economy of Reporting Climate Aid," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 39(11), pages 2010-2020.
    2. Jonathan Pickering & Frank Jotzo & Peter J. Wood, 2015. "Sharing the Global Climate Finance Effort Fairly with Limited Coordination," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 15(4), pages 39-62, November.
    3. Navroz K. Dubash & Lavanya Rajamani, 2010. "Beyond Copenhagen: next steps," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(6), pages 593-599, November.
    4. Rhona Barr & Samuel Fankhauser & Kirk Hamilton, 2010. "Adaptation investments: a resource allocation framework," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 15(8), pages 843-858, December.
    5. Aidy Halimanjaya, 2015. "Climate mitigation finance across developing countries: what are the major determinants?," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 223-252, March.
    6. David Ciplet & J. Timmons Roberts & Mizan Khan, 2013. "The Politics of International Climate Adaptation Funding: Justice and Divisions in the Greenhouse," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 13(1), pages 49-68, February.
    7. Steve Rayner, 2010. "How to eat an elephant: a bottom-up approach to climate policy," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(6), pages 615-621, November.
    8. William Hare & Claire Stockwell & Christian Flachsland & Sebastian Oberthür, 2010. "The architecture of the global climate regime: a top-down perspective," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(6), pages 600-614, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ieaple:v:17:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s10784-016-9347-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla) or (Rebekah McClure). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.