IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/grdene/v30y2021i1d10.1007_s10726-020-09706-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using a FMEA–TIFIAD Approach to Identify the Risk of Railway Dangerous Goods Transportation System

Author

Listed:
  • Wencheng Huang

    (Southwest Jiaotong University
    Southwest Jiaotong University
    Southwest Jiaotong University
    Southwest Jiaotong University)

  • Yueyang Li

    (Southwest Jiaotong University
    Southwest Jiaotong University)

  • Xingyi Kou

    (Southwest Jiaotong University
    Southwest Jiaotong University)

  • Wenzhe Wang

    (Southwest Jiaotong University
    Southwest Jiaotong University)

  • Yifei Xu

    (Southwest Jiaotong University
    Southwest Jiaotong University)

Abstract

In this paper a systemic approach that combines Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) and trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy information axiomatic design (TIFIAD) is proposed to identify the risk of railway dangerous goods transportation system (RDNGTS), which has seven steps: (1) identify potential risk factors and risk sub-indicators of RDNGTS; (2) define the failure criterion of severity of failures (S), portability of occurrence (O) and possibility of detection (D) of FMEA based on trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy numbers (TrIFNs); (3) invite experts to score the TrIFNs of S, O and D for each risk sub-indicator; (4) aggregate the TrIFNs of S, O and D for each risk sub-indicator; (5) calculate the TIFIAD of each risk sub-indicator; (6) calculate the total TIFIAD of each risk sub-indicator; (7) calculate the total TIFIAD of each risk factor. Compared with FMEA, FMEA–TIFIAD has the following improvements: (1) The TrIFNs are applied to score the S, O and D of each risk sub-indicator of RDNGTS; (2) The TIFIAD of the S, O and D are calculated for each risk sub-indicator, the product of the S, O and D could replace the Risk Priority Number (RPN) of FMEA; (3) The Entropy Weight Method is used to calculate the weight of each risk sub-indicator. The calculation results show that the potential human risk should be paid more attentions; the FMEA–TIFIAD is more reliable and accurate than FMEA. Finally the improvement suggestions for managers and operators of RDNGTS are given.

Suggested Citation

  • Wencheng Huang & Yueyang Li & Xingyi Kou & Wenzhe Wang & Yifei Xu, 2021. "Using a FMEA–TIFIAD Approach to Identify the Risk of Railway Dangerous Goods Transportation System," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 63-95, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:30:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s10726-020-09706-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10726-020-09706-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10726-020-09706-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10726-020-09706-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Govindan, Kannan & Chaudhuri, Atanu, 2016. "Interrelationships of risks faced by third party logistics service providers: A DEMATEL based approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 177-195.
    2. Wencheng Huang & Bin Shuai, 2017. "Using Improved Entropy-Cloud Model to Select High-Speed Railway Express Freight Train Service Sites," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-13, November.
    3. Jagtman, H.M. & Hale, A.R. & Heijer, T., 2006. "Ex ante assessment of safety issues of new technologies in transport," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 459-474, July.
    4. Arindam Garai & Palash Mandal & Tapan Kumar Roy, 2016. "Intuitionistic fuzzy T-sets based optimization technique for production-distribution planning in supply chain management," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 53(4), pages 950-975, December.
    5. Yip, Tsz Leung, 2008. "Port traffic risks - A study of accidents in Hong Kong waters," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(5), pages 921-931, September.
    6. Powell, J.H. & Mustafee, N. & Chen, A.S. & Hammond, M., 2016. "System-focused risk identification and assessment for disaster preparedness: Dynamic threat analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(2), pages 550-564.
    7. Jun Li & Hong Zhang & Yinshan Han & Baodong Wang, 2016. "Study on Failure of Third-Party Damage for Urban Gas Pipeline Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, November.
    8. Bendul, Julia C. & Skorna, Alexander C.H., 2016. "Exploring impact factors of shippers’ risk prevention activities: A European survey in transportation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 206-223.
    9. Karel De Bakker & Albert Boonstra & Hans Wortmann, 2014. "The communicative effect of risk identification on project success," International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(1/2), pages 138-156.
    10. Peeters, J.F.W. & Basten, R.J.I. & Tinga, T., 2018. "Improving failure analysis efficiency by combining FTA and FMEA in a recursive manner," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 36-44.
    11. Yang, Zhisen & Yang, Zaili & Yin, Jingbo, 2018. "Realising advanced risk-based port state control inspection using data-driven Bayesian networks," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 38-56.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huang, Wencheng & Zhang, Yue & Yu, Yaocheng & Xu, Yifei & Xu, Minhao & Zhang, Rui & De Dieu, Gatesi Jean & Yin, Dezhi & Liu, Zhanru, 2021. "Historical data-driven risk assessment of railway dangerous goods transportation system: Comparisons between Entropy Weight Method and Scatter Degree Method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    2. Jiang, Dan & Wu, Bing & Cheng, Zhiyou & Xue, Jie & van Gelder, P.H.A.J.M., 2021. "Towards a probabilistic model for estimation of grounding accidents in fluctuating backwater zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    3. Tim Gruchmann & Nadine Pratt & Jan Eiten & Ani Melkonyan, 2020. "4PL Digital Business Models in Sea Freight Logistics: The Case of FreightHub," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-14, May.
    4. Junjie Fu & Xinqiang Chen & Shubo Wu & Chaojian Shi & Huafeng Wu & Jiansen Zhao & Pengwen Xiong, 2020. "Mining ship deficiency correlations from historical port state control (PSC) inspection data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, February.
    5. Pani, Agnivesh & Mishra, Sabya & Sahu, Prasanta, 2022. "Developing multi-vehicle freight trip generation models quantifying the relationship between logistics outsourcing and insourcing decisions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    6. Lo, Huai-Wei & Liou, James J.H. & Huang, Chun-Nen & Chuang, Yen-Ching & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2020. "A new soft computing approach for analyzing the influential relationships of critical infrastructures," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 28(C).
    7. Li, Ying & Shou, Yongyi & Ding, Ronggui & Sun, Tao & Zhou, Qing, 2019. "Governing local sourcing practices of overseas projects for the Belt and Road Initiative: A framework and evaluation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 212-226.
    8. Venkatesh, V.G. & Zhang, Abraham & Deakins, Eric & Mani, Venkatesh, 2021. "Antecedents of social sustainability noncompliance in the Indian apparel sector," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    9. Shafiee, Mohammad & Zare-Mehrjerdi, Yahia & Govindan, Kannan & Dastgoshade, Sohaib, 2022. "A causality analysis of risks to perishable product supply chain networks during the COVID-19 outbreak era: An extended DEMATEL method under Pythagorean fuzzy environment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    10. Pei-Hsuan Tsai & Chih-Jou Chen & Ho-Chin Yang, 2021. "Using Porter’s Diamond Model to Assess the Competitiveness of Taiwan’s Solar Photovoltaic Industry," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440209, January.
    11. Bing Wu & Huibin Tian & Xinping Yan & C. Guedes Soares, 2020. "A probabilistic consequence estimation model for collision accidents in the downstream of Yangtze River using Bayesian Networks," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(2), pages 422-436, April.
    12. Xuecheng Tian & Yanxia Guan & Shuaian Wang, 2023. "Data Transformation in the Predict-Then-Optimize Framework: Enhancing Decision Making under Uncertainty," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-12, September.
    13. Md. Abdul Moktadir & Towfique Rahman & Syed Mithun Ali & Nazmun Nahar & Sanjoy Kumar Paul, 2020. "Examining barriers to reverse logistics practices in the leather footwear industry," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 293(2), pages 715-746, October.
    14. Mukherjee, Abheek Anjan & Raj, Alok & Aggarwal, Shikha, 2023. "Identification of barriers and their mitigation strategies for industry 5.0 implementation in emerging economies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    15. Zhi-Jiao Du & Zhi-Xiang Chen & Su-Min Yu, 2021. "Improved Failure Mode and Effect Analysis: Implementing Risk Assessment and Conflict Risk Mitigation with Probabilistic Linguistic Information," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-20, May.
    16. Anasse Amarouche & Philippe Chapellier & Alain George, 2018. "La gestion des risques dans une chaîne d’approvisionnement [La gestion des risques dans une chaine d'approvisionnement : Le cas de la filière d'approvisionnement en fruits et légumes d'une entrepri," Post-Print hal-02101506, HAL.
    17. Jomon Aliyas Paul & Leo MacDonald, 2017. "An empirical analysis of US vessel-related port accidents (2002–2012): Impact of union membership and port efficiency on accident incidence and economic damage," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 19(4), pages 723-748, December.
    18. Lo, Huai-Wei & Liou, James J.H. & Huang, Chun-Nen & Chuang, Yen-Ching, 2019. "A novel failure mode and effect analysis model for machine tool risk analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 173-183.
    19. Huang, Wencheng & Zhang, Rui & Xu, Minhao & Yu, Yaocheng & Xu, Yifei & De Dieu, Gatesi Jean, 2020. "Risk state changes analysis of railway dangerous goods transportation system: Based on the cusp catastrophe model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    20. Rong, H. & Teixeira, A.P. & Guedes Soares, C., 2022. "Maritime traffic probabilistic prediction based on ship motion pattern extraction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:30:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s10726-020-09706-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.