IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/finsto/v9y2005i3p399-413.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An entropy approach to the Stein and Stein model with correlation

Author

Listed:
  • Thorsten Rheinländer

Abstract

We outline a martingale duality method for determining the minimal entropy martingale measure in a general continuous semimartingale model, and provide the relevant verification results. This method is illustrated by a detailed case study of the Stein and Stein stochastic volatility model driven by two correlated Brownian motions. It turns out that in case the mean reversion level and the correlation coefficient are nonzero, an investor who can use trading strategies adapted to the Brownian filtration may achieve a higher expected exponential utility from terminal wealth than an investor who can only observe the price process. Copyright Springer-Verlag Berlin/Heidelberg 2005

Suggested Citation

  • Thorsten Rheinländer, 2005. "An entropy approach to the Stein and Stein model with correlation," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 399-413, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:finsto:v:9:y:2005:i:3:p:399-413
    DOI: 10.1007/s00780-004-0149-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s00780-004-0149-0
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00780-004-0149-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stein, Elias M & Stein, Jeremy C, 1991. "Stock Price Distributions with Stochastic Volatility: An Analytic Approach," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 4(4), pages 727-752.
    2. Becherer, Dirk, 2003. "Rational hedging and valuation of integrated risks under constant absolute risk aversion," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 1-28, August.
    3. David Heath & Eckhard Platen & Martin Schweizer, 2001. "A Comparison of Two Quadratic Approaches to Hedging in Incomplete Markets," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(4), pages 385-413, October.
    4. Freddy Delbaen & Peter Grandits & Thorsten Rheinländer & Dominick Samperi & Martin Schweizer & Christophe Stricker, 2002. "Exponential Hedging and Entropic Penalties," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(2), pages 99-123, April.
    5. Marco Frittelli, 2000. "The Minimal Entropy Martingale Measure and the Valuation Problem in Incomplete Markets," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(1), pages 39-52, January.
    6. Jean-Paul Laurent & Huyen Pham, 1999. "Dynamic programming and mean-variance hedging," Post-Print hal-03675953, HAL.
    7. Francesca Biagini & Paolo Guasoni & Maurizio Pratelli, 2000. "Mean‐Variance Hedging for Stochastic Volatility Models," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(2), pages 109-123, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thorsten Rheinländer & Jenny Sexton, 2011. "Hedging Derivatives," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number 8062, January.
    2. Thorsten Rheinländer & Gallus Steiger, 2010. "Utility Indifference Hedging with Exponential Additive Processes," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 17(2), pages 151-169, June.
    3. Paolo Guasoni & Scott Robertson, 2012. "Portfolios and risk premia for the long run," Papers 1203.1399, arXiv.org.
    4. Friedrich Hubalek & Carlo Sgarra, 2008. "On the Esscher transforms and other equivalent martingale measures for Barndorff-Nielsen and Shephard stochastic volatility models with jumps," Papers 0807.1227, arXiv.org.
    5. Carole Bernard & Zhenyu Cui & Don McLeish, 2013. "On the martingale property in stochastic volatility models based on time-homogeneous diffusions," Papers 1310.0092, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2014.
    6. Smimou, K. & Bector, C.R. & Jacoby, G., 2007. "A subjective assessment of approximate probabilities with a portfolio application," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 134-160, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Hobson, 2004. "STOCHASTIC VOLATILITY MODELS, CORRELATION, AND THE q‐OPTIMAL MEASURE," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(4), pages 537-556, October.
    2. Michael Mania & Revaz Tevzadze, 2008. "Backward Stochastic PDEs Related to the Utility Maximization Problem," ICER Working Papers - Applied Mathematics Series 07-2008, ICER - International Centre for Economic Research.
    3. Vicky Henderson & David Hobson & Sam Howison & Tino Kluge, 2005. "A Comparison of Option Prices Under Different Pricing Measures in a Stochastic Volatility Model with Correlation," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 5-25, June.
    4. Vicky Henderson & David Hobson & Sam Howison & Tino Kluge, 2003. "A Comparison of q-optimal Option Prices in a Stochastic Volatility Model with Correlation," OFRC Working Papers Series 2003mf02, Oxford Financial Research Centre.
    5. Thorsten Rheinländer & Jenny Sexton, 2011. "Hedging Derivatives," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number 8062, January.
    6. Tak Siu, 2006. "Option Pricing Under Autoregressive Random Variance Models," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 62-75.
    7. Yang Shen, 2020. "Effect of Variance Swap in Hedging Volatility Risk," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-34, July.
    8. Kallsen Jan & Rheinländer Thorsten, 2011. "Asymptotic utility-based pricing and hedging for exponential utility," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 28(1), pages 17-36, March.
    9. Owari, Keita & 尾張, 圭太, 2008. "Robust Exponential Hedging and Indifference Valuation," Discussion Papers 2008-09, Graduate School of Economics, Hitotsubashi University.
    10. Vicky Henderson, 2002. "Analytical Comparisons of Option prices in Stochastic Volatility Models," OFRC Working Papers Series 2002mf03, Oxford Financial Research Centre.
    11. Michael Monoyios, 2012. "Malliavin calculus method for asymptotic expansion of dual control problems," Papers 1209.6497, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2013.
    12. Mahan Tahvildari, 2021. "Forward indifference valuation and hedging of basis risk under partial information," Papers 2101.00251, arXiv.org.
    13. Tahir Choulli & Jun Deng, 2014. "Structure conditions under progressively added information," Papers 1403.3459, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2018.
    14. Weidong Tian & Daisuke Yoshikawa, 2017. "Analyzing Equilibrium in Incomplete Markets with Model Uncertainty," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 17(2), pages 235-262, June.
    15. Lixin Wu & Min Dai, 2009. "Pricing jump risk with utility indifference," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 177-186.
    16. Leitner Johannes, 2005. "Optimal portfolios with expected loss constraints and shortfall risk optimal martingale measures," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 23(1/2005), pages 49-66, January.
    17. Regis Houssou & Olivier Besson, 2010. "Indifference of Defaultable Bonds with Stochastic Intensity models," Papers 1003.4118, arXiv.org.
    18. Mark P. Owen & Gordan Žitković, 2009. "Optimal Investment With An Unbounded Random Endowment And Utility‐Based Pricing," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(1), pages 129-159, January.
    19. Thorsten Rheinländer & Gallus Steiger, 2010. "Utility Indifference Hedging with Exponential Additive Processes," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 17(2), pages 151-169, June.
    20. Shuoqing Deng & Xiaolu Tan & Xiang Yu, 2018. "Utility maximization with proportional transaction costs under model uncertainty," Papers 1805.06498, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2019.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:finsto:v:9:y:2005:i:3:p:399-413. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.