IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1805.06498.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Utility maximization with proportional transaction costs under model uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Shuoqing Deng
  • Xiaolu Tan
  • Xiang Yu

Abstract

We consider a discrete time financial market with proportional transaction costs under model uncertainty, and study a num\'eraire-based semi-static utility maximization problem with an exponential utility preference. The randomization techniques recently developed in \cite{BDT17} allow us to transform the original problem into a frictionless counterpart on an enlarged space. By suggesting a different dynamic programming argument than in \cite{bartl2016exponential}, we are able to prove the existence of the optimal strategy and the convex duality theorem in our context with transaction costs. In the frictionless framework, this alternative dynamic programming argument also allows us to generalize the main results in \cite{bartl2016exponential} to a weaker market condition. Moreover, as an application of the duality representation, some basic features of utility indifference prices are investigated in our robust setting with transaction costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Shuoqing Deng & Xiaolu Tan & Xiang Yu, 2018. "Utility maximization with proportional transaction costs under model uncertainty," Papers 1805.06498, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2019.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1805.06498
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1805.06498
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Romain Blanchard & Laurence Carassus, 2017. "Convergence of utility indifference prices to the superreplication price in a multiple-priors framework," Papers 1709.09465, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2020.
    2. Erhan Bayraktar & Yuchong Zhang & Zhou Zhou, 2014. "A Note on the Fundamental Theorem of Asset Pricing under Model Uncertainty," Risks, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-9, October.
    3. Julien Hugonnier & Dmitry Kramkov, 2004. "Optimal investment with random endowments in incomplete markets," Papers math/0405293, arXiv.org.
    4. Mark P. Owen & Gordan Žitković, 2009. "Optimal Investment With An Unbounded Random Endowment And Utility‐Based Pricing," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(1), pages 129-159, January.
    5. Freddy Delbaen & Peter Grandits & Thorsten Rheinländer & Dominick Samperi & Martin Schweizer & Christophe Stricker, 2002. "Exponential Hedging and Entropic Penalties," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(2), pages 99-123, April.
    6. repec:dau:papers:123456789/5980 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Marcel Nutz, 2016. "Utility Maximization Under Model Uncertainty In Discrete Time," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(2), pages 252-268, April.
    8. Jaksa Cvitanić & Walter Schachermayer & Hui Wang, 2017. "Erratum to: Utility maximization in incomplete markets with random endowment," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 867-872, July.
    9. Bruno Bouchard & Marcel Nutz, 2013. "Arbitrage and duality in nondominated discrete-time models," Papers 1305.6008, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2015.
    10. Yuri Kabanov, 2009. "Markets with Transaction Costs. Mathematical Theory," Post-Print hal-00488168, HAL.
    11. Matteo Burzoni, 2015. "Arbitrage and Hedging in model-independent markets with frictions," Papers 1512.01488, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2016.
    12. Bruno Bouchard & Marcel Nutz, 2016. "Consistent price systems under model uncertainty," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 83-98, January.
    13. Becherer, Dirk, 2003. "Rational hedging and valuation of integrated risks under constant absolute risk aversion," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 1-28, August.
    14. B. Acciaio & M. Beiglböck & F. Penkner & W. Schachermayer, 2016. "A Model-Free Version Of The Fundamental Theorem Of Asset Pricing And The Super-Replication Theorem," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(2), pages 233-251, April.
    15. Bruno Bouchard & Marcel Nutz, 2016. "Consistent price systems under model uncertainty," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 83-98, January.
    16. Laurence Carassus & Miklós Rásonyi, 2007. "Optimal Strategies and Utility-Based Prices Converge When Agents’ Preferences Do," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(1), pages 102-117, February.
    17. (**), Hui Wang & Jaksa Cvitanic & (*), Walter Schachermayer, 2001. "Utility maximization in incomplete markets with random endowment," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 259-272.
    18. Erhan Bayraktar & Yuchong Zhang, 2016. "Fundamental Theorem of Asset Pricing Under Transaction Costs and Model Uncertainty," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 41(3), pages 1039-1054, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Erhan Bayraktar & Matteo Burzoni, 2020. "On the quasi-sure superhedging duality with frictions," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 249-275, January.
    2. Shuoqing Deng & Xiaolu Tan & Xiang Yu, 2020. "Utility Maximization with Proportional Transaction Costs Under Model Uncertainty," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 45(4), pages 1210-1236, November.
    3. Bartl, Daniel, 2020. "Conditional nonlinear expectations," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 130(2), pages 785-805.
    4. Mun-Chol Kim & Song-Chol Ryom, 2022. "Pathwise superhedging under proportional transaction costs," Mathematics and Financial Economics, Springer, volume 16, number 4, October.
    5. Junbeom Lee & Xiang Yu & Chao Zhou, 2019. "Lifetime Ruin under High-watermark Fees and Drift Uncertainty," Papers 1909.01121, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2020.
    6. Ariel Neufeld & Antonis Papapantoleon & Qikun Xiang, 2020. "Model-free bounds for multi-asset options using option-implied information and their exact computation," Papers 2006.14288, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shuoqing Deng & Xiaolu Tan & Xiang Yu, 2020. "Utility Maximization with Proportional Transaction Costs Under Model Uncertainty," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 45(4), pages 1210-1236, November.
    2. Mun-Chol Kim & Song-Chol Ryom, 2022. "Pathwise superhedging under proportional transaction costs," Mathematics and Financial Economics, Springer, volume 16, number 4, October.
    3. Erhan Bayraktar & Matteo Burzoni, 2020. "On the quasi-sure superhedging duality with frictions," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 249-275, January.
    4. Keita Owari, 2011. "A Note on Utility Maximization with Unbounded Random Endowment," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 18(1), pages 89-103, March.
    5. Kim Weston, 2016. "Stability of utility maximization in nonequivalent markets," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 511-541, April.
    6. Erhan Bayraktar & Yuchong Zhang, 2016. "Fundamental Theorem of Asset Pricing Under Transaction Costs and Model Uncertainty," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 41(3), pages 1039-1054, August.
    7. Kim Weston, 2014. "Stability of Utility Maximization in Nonequivalent Markets," Papers 1410.0915, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2015.
    8. Jan Obłój & Johannes Wiesel, 2021. "A unified framework for robust modelling of financial markets in discrete time," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 427-468, July.
    9. Matteo Burzoni & Mario Sikic, 2018. "Robust martingale selection problem and its connections to the no-arbitrage theory," Papers 1801.03574, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2018.
    10. Erhan Bayraktar & Gu Wang, 2018. "Quantile Hedging in a semi-static market with model uncertainty," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 87(2), pages 197-227, April.
    11. Jonas Blessing & Michael Kupper & Alessandro Sgarabottolo, 2024. "Discrete approximation of risk-based prices under volatility uncertainty," Papers 2411.00713, arXiv.org.
    12. Horst, Ulrich & Hu, Ying & Imkeller, Peter & Réveillac, Anthony & Zhang, Jianing, 2014. "Forward–backward systems for expected utility maximization," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 124(5), pages 1813-1848.
    13. Michail Anthropelos & Gordan Zitkovic, 2009. "Partial Equilibria with Convex Capital Requirements: Existence, Uniqueness and Stability," Papers 0901.3318, arXiv.org.
    14. Kamma, Thijs & Pelsser, Antoon, 2022. "Near-optimal asset allocation in financial markets with trading constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(2), pages 766-781.
    15. Gu, Lingqi & Lin, Yiqing & Yang, Junjian, 2016. "On the dual problem of utility maximization in incomplete markets," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 126(4), pages 1019-1035.
    16. Daniel Bartl, 2016. "Exponential utility maximization under model uncertainty for unbounded endowments," Papers 1610.00999, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2019.
    17. Felix-Benedikt Liebrich & Marco Maggis & Gregor Svindland, 2020. "Model Uncertainty: A Reverse Approach," Papers 2004.06636, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2022.
    18. Guohui Guan & Zongxia Liang & Yilun Song, 2022. "The continuous-time pre-commitment KMM problem in incomplete markets," Papers 2210.13833, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2023.
    19. Kasper Larsen & Halil Mete Soner & Gordan Žitković, 2020. "Conditional Davis pricing," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 565-599, July.
    20. Ariel Neufeld & Antonis Papapantoleon & Qikun Xiang, 2023. "Model-Free Bounds for Multi-Asset Options Using Option-Implied Information and Their Exact Computation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(4), pages 2051-2068, April.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1805.06498. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.