IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/fininn/v11y2025i1d10.1186_s40854-025-00770-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unleashing the power of ChatGPT in finance research: opportunities and challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Zifeng Feng

    (The University of Texas at El Paso)

  • Gangqing Hu

    (West Virginia University)

  • Bingxin Li

    (West Virginia University)

  • Jinge Wang

    (West Virginia University)

Abstract

Natural language processing (NLP) technologies, such as ChatGPT, are revolutionizing various fields, including finance research. This article explores the potential of ChatGPT as a transformative tool for finance researchers. We illustrate various applications of ChatGPT in finance research, from analyzing financial charts and providing coding support to the theoretical derivation of financial models. Significant advances in multimodal learning, such as Visual Referring Prompting (VRP), are also explored for their potential to enhance ChatGPT's image analysis capabilities. Furthermore, we conduct a comparative analysis of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, and Microsoft Bing to examine their distinct features, strengths, and weaknesses to provide valuable insights into their applicability in finance research. We demonstrate the innovative opportunities and insights provided by the development of ChatGPT to enrich the financial research process. By addressing the potential pitfalls and ethical considerations associated with using ChatGPT, we aim to promote responsible AI adoption and a more in-depth understanding of the role of advanced NLP technologies in shaping the future of finance research and practice. Overall, this paper underscores ChatGPT's transformative role in finance research, detailing its applications, benefits, and challenges, and advocating for ethical AI adoption to shape the future of the field.

Suggested Citation

  • Zifeng Feng & Gangqing Hu & Bingxin Li & Jinge Wang, 2025. "Unleashing the power of ChatGPT in finance research: opportunities and challenges," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 11(1), pages 1-26, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:fininn:v:11:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1186_s40854-025-00770-3
    DOI: 10.1186/s40854-025-00770-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s40854-025-00770-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s40854-025-00770-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Boyang Chen & Zongxiao Wu & Ruoran Zhao, 2023. "From fiction to fact: the growing role of generative AI in business and finance," Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 471-496, October.
    2. Chris Stokel-Walker, 2023. "ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove," Nature, Nature, vol. 613(7945), pages 620-621, January.
    3. Pelster, Matthias & Val, Joel, 2024. "Can ChatGPT assist in picking stocks?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    4. Adam Zaremba & Ender Demir, 2023. "ChatGPT: Unlocking the future of NLP in finance," Modern Finance, Modern Finance Institute, vol. 1(1), pages 93-98.
    5. Smales, Lee A., 2023. "Classification of RBA monetary policy announcements using ChatGPT," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PC).
    6. Dowling, Michael & Lucey, Brian, 2023. "ChatGPT for (Finance) research: The Bananarama Conjecture," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    7. Black, Fischer & Scholes, Myron S, 1973. "The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 81(3), pages 637-654, May-June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hassnian Ali & Ahmet Faruk Aysan, 2023. "What will ChatGPT revolutionize in the financial industry?," Modern Finance, Modern Finance Institute, vol. 1(1), pages 116-129.
    2. Julian Junyan Wang & Victor Xiaoqi Wang, 2025. "Assessing Consistency and Reproducibility in the Outputs of Large Language Models: Evidence Across Diverse Finance and Accounting Tasks," Papers 2503.16974, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2025.
    3. Minh Tam Tammy Schlosky & Serkan Karadas & Sterling Raskie, 2024. "ChatGPT, Help! I Am in Financial Trouble," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-39, June.
    4. Saggu, Aman & Ante, Lennart, 2023. "The influence of ChatGPT on artificial intelligence related crypto assets: Evidence from a synthetic control analysis," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 55(PB).
    5. Giordano, Vito & Spada, Irene & Chiarello, Filippo & Fantoni, Gualtiero, 2024. "The impact of ChatGPT on human skills: A quantitative study on twitter data," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    6. Hoffmann, Stefan & Lasarov, Wassili & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2024. "AI-empowered scale development: Testing the potential of ChatGPT," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    7. Zhisheng Chen, 2025. "Revolutionizing finance with conversational AI: a focus on ChatGPT implementation and challenges," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, December.
    8. Amina Badreddine & Hadjira Larbi Cherif, 2023. "ChatGPT in Academic Research: Demonstrating Limitations through Real Practical Examples," Post-Print hal-04379581, HAL.
    9. Siddik, Abu Bakkar & Li, Yong & Du, Anna Min, 2024. "Unlocking funding success for generative AI startups: The crucial role of investor influence," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 69(PB).
    10. Ko, Hyungjin & Lee, Jaewook, 2024. "Can ChatGPT improve investment decisions? From a portfolio management perspective," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    11. Pelster, Matthias & Val, Joel, 2024. "Can ChatGPT assist in picking stocks?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    12. Fosso Wamba, Samuel & Queiroz, Maciel M. & Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel Jose & Shi, Chunming (Victor), 2023. "Are both generative AI and ChatGPT game changers for 21st-Century operations and supply chain excellence?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    13. Beckmann, Lars & Hark, Paul F., 2024. "ChatGPT and the banking business: Insights from the US stock market on potential implications for banks," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    14. William R. Morgan, 2023. "Finance Must Be Defended: Cybernetics, Neoliberalism and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    15. Filipe Fontanela & Antoine Jacquier & Mugad Oumgari, 2019. "A Quantum algorithm for linear PDEs arising in Finance," Papers 1912.02753, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2021.
    16. Weihan Li & Jin E. Zhang & Xinfeng Ruan & Pakorn Aschakulporn, 2024. "An empirical study on the early exercise premium of American options: Evidence from OEX and XEO options," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(7), pages 1117-1153, July.
    17. Jun, Doobae & Ku, Hyejin, 2015. "Static hedging of chained-type barrier options," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 317-327.
    18. Thomas Kokholm & Martin Stisen, 2015. "Joint pricing of VIX and SPX options with stochastic volatility and jump models," Journal of Risk Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 16(1), pages 27-48, January.
    19. Paul Ormerod, 2010. "La crisis actual y la culpabilidad de la teoría macroeconómica," Revista de Economía Institucional, Universidad Externado de Colombia - Facultad de Economía, vol. 12(22), pages 111-128, January-J.
    20. An Chen & Thai Nguyen & Thorsten Sehner, 2022. "Unit-Linked Tontine: Utility-Based Design, Pricing and Performance," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-27, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ChatGPT; Natural language processing; Large language models; AI; Finance research; Academia; Opportunities; Challenges;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G00 - Financial Economics - - General - - - General
    • C89 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Other
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:fininn:v:11:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1186_s40854-025-00770-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.