IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v27y2025i5d10.1007_s10668-023-04358-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on channel selection of low-carbon product considering advertising promotion under substitute competition

Author

Listed:
  • Haiyan Li

    (Chongqing University of Technology)

  • Qihan Cui

    (Chongqing University of Technology)

  • Lei Dou

    (Chongqing University of Technology)

  • Han Song

    (Chongqing University of Technology)

  • Ying Dai

    (Chongqing University of Technology)

  • Xinran Hu

    (Chongqing University of Technology)

Abstract

With the pressure to cut carbon emissions and the new opportunities of the low-carbon market, manufacturers are starting to shift from regular product to low-carbon product. So, the issues arise on the distribution channel selection of low-carbon products by manufacturer under coexist and substitute competition between the regular products and low-carbon products. In this paper, we established game models to describe the decision behavior of manufacturer and retailer in the regular channel and a dedicated channel. Comparative analyses found under traditional wholesale price contracts, the dedicated retailer’s advertising benefits both the regular channel retailer and itself when the cost coefficient of advertising falls within a certain range of values, but it is disadvantageous to itself and beneficial to the regular channel retailer in another value range. Furthermore, the results show when the cost coefficient of advertising is less than a certain threshold, the optimal strategy for manufacturer is to choose the regular channel; Otherwise, it depends on the cost coefficient of low-carbon level and consumer sensitivity. If the cost coefficient is below a certain threshold, the optimal strategy is to choose the regular channel; otherwise, choose a dedicated channel. Similarly, consumer sensitivity is more than a certain threshold; choose the regular channel; otherwise, choose a dedicated channel. We identified the threshold points. Numerical analysis reveals that if the manufacturer cannot exactly estimate the cost coefficient of low-carbon level, a dedicated channel may mean less to lose when the low-carbon products first hit the market, and as the market matures, it becomes particularly important to estimate consumer sensitivity to low-carbon level.

Suggested Citation

  • Haiyan Li & Qihan Cui & Lei Dou & Han Song & Ying Dai & Xinran Hu, 2025. "Research on channel selection of low-carbon product considering advertising promotion under substitute competition," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(5), pages 11283-11306, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s10668-023-04358-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-023-04358-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-023-04358-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-023-04358-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shaojian Qu & Hui Yang & Ying Ji, 2021. "Low-carbon supply chain optimization considering warranty period and carbon emission reduction level under cap-and-trade regulation," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(12), pages 18040-18067, December.
    2. Zhang, Linghong & Wang, Jingguo & You, Jianxin, 2015. "Consumer environmental awareness and channel coordination with two substitutable products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(1), pages 63-73.
    3. Isabelle Perrigne & Quang Vuong, 2011. "Nonparametric Identification of a Contract Model With Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 79(5), pages 1499-1539, September.
    4. Shaofu Du & Jiaang Zhu & Huifang Jiao & Wuyi Ye, 2015. "Game-theoretical analysis for supply chain with consumer preference to low carbon," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(12), pages 3753-3768, June.
    5. Yang, Jing & Xie, Jinxing & Deng, Xiaoxue & Xiong, Huachun, 2013. "Cooperative advertising in a distribution channel with fairness concerns," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(2), pages 401-407.
    6. Cheng Che & Zhihong Zhang & Xiaoguang Zhang & Yi Chen & Wei Zhang, 2021. "Two-Stage Pricing Decision for Low-Carbon Products Based on Consumer Strategic Behaviour," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-12, January.
    7. Wang, Wei & Li, Gang & Cheng, T.C.E., 2016. "Channel selection in a supply chain with a multi-channel retailer: The role of channel operating costs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 54-65.
    8. Yang, Lei & Zhang, Qin & Ji, Jingna, 2017. "Pricing and carbon emission reduction decisions in supply chains with vertical and horizontal cooperation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 286-297.
    9. Wang, Lisha & Chen, Jing & Song, Huaming, 2021. "Marketplace or reseller? Platform strategy in the presence of customer returns," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuyin Yi & Jinxi Li, 2018. "Cost-Sharing Contracts for Energy Saving and Emissions Reduction of a Supply Chain under the Conditions of Government Subsidies and a Carbon Tax," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-33, March.
    2. Weisheng Deng & Lu Liu, 2019. "Comparison of Carbon Emission Reduction Modes: Impacts of Capital Constraint and Risk Aversion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-30, March.
    3. Daozhi Zhao & Jiaqin Hao & Cejun Cao & Hongshuai Han, 2019. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of Three-Player for Low-Carbon Production Capacity Sharing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Hui Li & Chuanxu Wang & Meng Shang & Wei Ou, 2017. "Pricing, Carbon Emission Reduction, Low-Carbon Promotion and Returning Decision in a Closed-Loop Supply Chain under Vertical and Horizontal Cooperation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-26, November.
    5. Liangjie Xia & Yongwan Bai & Sanjoy Ghose & Juanjuan Qin, 2022. "Differential game analysis of carbon emissions reduction and promotion in a sustainable supply chain considering social preferences," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 310(1), pages 257-292, March.
    6. Xiutian Shi & Xiaoli Zhang & Ciwei Dong & Subin Wen, 2018. "Economic Performance and Emission Reduction of Supply Chains in Different Power Structures: Perspective of Sustainable Investment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, April.
    7. Qiang Du & Hongyu Zhu & Youdan Huang & Qiaoyu Pang & Jinzhao Shi, 2024. "Profit allocation of carbon emission reduction in the construction supply chain," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(8), pages 20531-20560, August.
    8. Shoufeng Ji & Dan Zhao & Xiaoshuai Peng, 2018. "Joint Decisions on Emission Reduction and Inventory Replenishment with Overconfidence and Low-Carbon Preference," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-21, April.
    9. Changhong Li & Jialuo Wang & Jiao Zheng & Jiani Gao, 2022. "Effects of Carbon Policy on Carbon Emission Reduction in Supply Chain under Uncertain Demand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, May.
    10. Jun Wang & Xianxue Cheng & Xinyu Wang & Hongtao Yang & Shuhua Zhang, 2019. "Myopic versus Farsighted Behaviors in a Low-Carbon Supply Chain with Reference Emission Effects," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-15, February.
    11. Khosroshahi, Hossein & Dimitrov, Stanko & Hejazi, Seyed Reza, 2021. "Pricing, greening, and transparency decisions considering the impact of government subsidies and CSR behavior in supply chain decisions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    12. Wen Cheng & Qunqi Wu & Fei Ye & Qian Li, 2022. "The Impact of Government Interventions and Consumer Green Preferences on the Competition between Green and Nongreen Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-34, May.
    13. Ma, Junhai & Tian, Yi & Xu, Tiantong & Koivumäki, Timo & Xu, Yueqiang, 2022. "Dynamic game study of multi-channel supply chain under cap-and-trade regulation," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    14. Sim, Jeongeun & Kim, Bowon, 2021. "Regulatory versus consumer pressure and retailer responsibility for upstream pollution in a supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    15. Xiaoyan Wang & Minggao Xue & Lu Xing, 2018. "Analysis of Carbon Emission Reduction in a Dual-Channel Supply Chain with Cap-And-Trade Regulation and Low-Carbon Preference," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, February.
    16. El Ouardighi, Fouad & Sim, Jeongeun & Kim, Bowon, 2021. "Pollution accumulation and abatement policies in two supply chains under vertical and horizontal competition and strategy types," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    17. Maojun Zhang & Jiaqi Li & Feifei Liu & Jiangxia Nan & Jiawen Jiang, 2024. "Pricing and Financing Strategies of Dual-Channel Green Supply Chain with Risk Aversion and Consumer Preferences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-26, June.
    18. Xu, Song & Govindan, Kannan & Wang, Wanru & Yang, Wenting, 2024. "Supply chain management under cap-and-trade regulation: A literature review and research opportunities," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    19. Nan Li & Mingjiang Deng & Hanshu Mou & Deshan Tang & Zhou Fang & Qin Zhou & Changgao Cheng & Yingdi Wang, 2022. "Government Participation in Supply Chain Low-Carbon Technology R&D and Green Marketing Strategy Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-27, July.
    20. Hua Wang & Cuicui Wang, 2024. "Agricultural manufacturers’ carbon abatement oriented to government subsidy and sales efforts," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 4335-4363, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s10668-023-04358-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.