IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v27y2025i5d10.1007_s10668-023-04328-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental information disclosure, market competition, and green transformation: evidence from Chinese heavily polluting listed companies

Author

Listed:
  • Kuang-Cheng Chai

    (Guilin University of Electronic Technology)

  • Jia-Hui Zhang

    (Guilin University of Electronic Technology)

  • Zi-Lu Wang

    (Guilin University of Electronic Technology)

  • Yu-Jiao Lu

    (Guilin University of Electronic Technology)

  • Xing Jin

    (Guilin University of Electronic Technology)

Abstract

With the further deterioration of the global ecological environment and increased market competition, promoting the green transformation (GT) of heavily polluting companies with high consumption and emissions, and environmental damage has been an inevitable trend in green development. The public is becoming increasingly concerned about whether environmental information disclosure (EID) can drive the green transformation of heavy polluters. Based on the annual data of A-share listed companies with heavily pollution from 2011 to 2020, this study scores EID according to 30 environmental disclosure indexes (total 30 points) and investigates nonlinear regression to examine the impact of EID on GT and the moderating effect of market competition. Research has found a positive U-shaped relationship between EID and GT. When the level of EID exceeds 3 points (inflection point), it will have a positive impact on GT. Market competition flattens the positive U-shaped relationship, and the inflection point shifts to the right. The inflection point for EID rises from 3 to 4. The mean level of EID of heavy polluters is close to 7, which is low overall. However, most of the them have already exceeded the inflection point. This study provides new literature and perspectives on the nonlinear relationship between EID and GT. The findings provide intrinsic motivation for managers to take the initiative in EID and are also relevant for promoting the green transformation of heavy polluters, government regulation of the market, and sustainable human development.

Suggested Citation

  • Kuang-Cheng Chai & Jia-Hui Zhang & Zi-Lu Wang & Yu-Jiao Lu & Xing Jin, 2025. "Environmental information disclosure, market competition, and green transformation: evidence from Chinese heavily polluting listed companies," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(5), pages 10693-10717, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s10668-023-04328-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-023-04328-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-023-04328-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-023-04328-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mousami Prasad & Trupti Mishra & Arti D. Kalro, 2017. "Environmental disclosure by Indian companies: an empirical study," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 1999-2022, October.
    2. Liang Zhao & Liangyu Chen, 2022. "Research on the Impact of Government Environmental Information Disclosure on Green Total Factor Productivity: Empirical Experience from Chinese Province," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-20, January.
    3. Keishun Suzuki, 2020. "Competition, patent protection, and innovation with heterogeneous firms in an endogenous market structure," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 22(3), pages 729-750, June.
    4. Im, Hyun Joong & Park, Young Joon & Shon, Janghoon, 2015. "Product market competition and the value of innovation: Evidence from US patent data," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 78-82.
    5. Benjamin E. Hermalin & Michael S. Weisbach, 2012. "Information Disclosure and Corporate Governance," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 67(1), pages 195-234, February.
    6. Angela Patrícia Bovolini Pedron & Clea Beatriz Macagnan & Davi Souza Simon & Daniel Francisco Vancin, 2021. "Environmental disclosure effects on returns and market value," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 4614-4633, March.
    7. Zhenjun Yan & Xinyan Wu & Jing Li & Bingqing Liang, 2022. "Competition and Heterogeneous Innovation Qualities: Evidence from a Natural Experiment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-21, June.
    8. Emma Serwaa Obobisa & Haibo Chen & Isaac Adjei Mensah, 2023. "Transitions to sustainable development: the role of green innovation and institutional quality," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(7), pages 6751-6780, July.
    9. Hyunah Lee & Jaehong Lee, 2022. "Industry Competition, Corporate Governance, and Voluntary Disclosure of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Information: Evidence from South Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-15, December.
    10. Kuang-Cheng Chai & Yang Yang & Chin-Piao Yeh & Li-Mei Liang, 2022. "External profit pressure and operating efficiency: evidence from Chinese listed companies," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(13), pages 1449-1459, March.
    11. Liliana Meza-González & Jaime Marie Sepulveda, 2019. "The impact of competition with China in the US market on innovation in Mexican manufacturing firms," Latin American Economic Review, Springer;Centro de Investigaciòn y Docencia Económica (CIDE), vol. 28(1), pages 1-21, December.
    12. Yingying Sun & Lei Wu & Shi Yin, 2020. "Green Innovation Risk Identification of the Manufacturing Industry under Global Value Chain Based on Grounded Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-26, December.
    13. Ahmed Mohamed Habib & Nahia Mourad, 2022. "Analyzing the Efficiency of Working Capital Management: a New Approach Based on DEA-Malmquist Technology," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 3(3), pages 1-20, September.
    14. James M. Plečnik & Leo L. Yang & Joseph H. Zhang, 2022. "Corporate innovation and future earnings: does early patent disclosure matter?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(S1), pages 2011-2056, April.
    15. Zhongfei Chen & Yu Xiao & Kangqi Jiang, 2023. "Corporate green innovation and stock liquidity in China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(S1), pages 1381-1415, April.
    16. Ivo Hristov & Antonio Chirico, 2023. "The cultural dimension as a key value driver of the sustainable development at a strategic level: an integrated five-dimensional approach," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(7), pages 7011-7028, July.
    17. Zhong Ma & Guang Shu & Qi Wang & Longfeng Wang, 2022. "Sustainable Governance and Green Innovation: A Perspective from Gender Diversity in China’s Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-22, May.
    18. Wang, Juxian & Ma, Mengdi & Dong, Tianyi & Zhang, Zheyuan, 2023. "Do ESG ratings promote corporate green innovation? A quasi-natural experiment based on SynTao Green Finance's ESG ratings," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    19. Haixia Shi & Change Shen, 2022. "Tax Competition, Capital Flow, and the Innovation Efficiency of Industrial Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-12, April.
    20. Xiaowei Ding & Lyu Ye & Yueying Yang & Olga Efimova & Alina Steblyanskaya & Junfeng Zhang, 2022. "The Impact Mechanism of Environmental Information Disclosure on Corporate Sustainability Performance—Micro-Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-22, September.
    21. Verrecchia, Robert E., 1983. "Discretionary disclosure," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 179-194, April.
    22. Richard F. J. Haans & Constant Pieters & Zi-Lin He, 2016. "Thinking about U: Theorizing and testing U- and inverted U-shaped relationships in strategy research," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(7), pages 1177-1195, July.
    23. Anrong Gao & Tianren Xiong & Yuxi Luo & Defeng Meng, 2023. "Promote or Crowd Out? The Impact of Environmental Information Disclosure Methods on Enterprise Value," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    24. Rao, Amar & Dagar, Vishal & Sohag, Kazi & Dagher, Leila & Tanin, Tauhidul Islam, 2023. "Good for the planet, good for the wallet: The ESG impact on financial performance in India," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    25. Gordon Briest & Elmar Lukas & Sascha H. Mölls & Timo Willershausen, 2020. "Innovation speed under uncertainty and competition," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(8), pages 1517-1527, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sheng-Syan Chen & Chia-Wei Huang & Chuan-Yang Hwang & Yanzhi Wang, 2022. "Voluntary disclosure and corporate innovation," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 58(3), pages 1081-1115, April.
    2. Albring, Susan M. & Xu, Xiaolu, 2018. "Management earnings forecasts, managerial incentives, and risk-taking," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 48-69.
    3. Albring, Susan & Huang, Shawn & Pereira, Raynolde & Xu, Xiaolu, 2020. "Disclosure and liquidity management: Evidence from regulation fair disclosure," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(3).
    4. Ann Terlaak & Seonghoon Kim & Taewoo Roh, 2018. "Not Good, Not Bad: The Effect of Family Control on Environmental Performance Disclosure by Business Group Firms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(4), pages 977-996, December.
    5. Zhangfan Cao & Chen Hua & Yan Tong & Xi Wang, 2023. "The crowding‐out effects of innovation information disclosure on peers' innovation: Evidence from innovation‐driven M&As in China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(5), pages 4883-4908, December.
    6. Helen Hurwitz & Yan Sun, 2023. "Regulation Fair Disclosure and the timeliness of long‐horizon management forecasts," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(9-10), pages 1808-1835, October.
    7. Edmans, Alex & Huang, Chong & Heinle, Mirko, 2013. "The Real Costs of Disclosure," CEPR Discussion Papers 9637, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    8. Datta, Sudip & Iskandar-Datta, Mai & Singh, Vivek, 2013. "Product market power, industry structure, and corporate earnings management," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 3273-3285.
    9. Im, Hyun Joong & Shon, Janghoon, 2019. "The effect of technological imitation on corporate innovation: Evidence from US patent data," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(9), pages 1-1.
    10. Ma, Xuejiao & Ma, Xiaojun & Fei, Wei & Jiang, Qichuan & Qin, Wen, 2025. "Is more always better? Investor-firm interactions, market competition and innovation performance of firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    11. Allaya, Manel & Derouiche, Imen & Muessig, Anke, 2022. "Voluntary disclosure, ownership structure, and corporate debt maturity: A study of French listed firms," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    12. Barg, Johannes A. & Drobetz, Wolfgang & El Ghoul, Sadok & Guedhami, Omrane & Schröder, Henning, 2024. "Institutional dual ownership and voluntary greenhouse gas emission disclosure," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    13. Wang, Kun Tracy & Wu, Yue & Ho, Kin-Yip, 2021. "Internal control reporting and cost of bond financing: Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1323-1346.
    14. Lemma, Tesfaye T. & Negash, Minga & Mlilo, Mthokozisi & Lulseged, Ayalew, 2018. "Institutional ownership, product market competition, and earnings management: Some evidence from international data," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 151-163.
    15. Hans B. Christensen & Luzi Hail & Christian Leuz, 2021. "Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 1176-1248, September.
    16. Kimball Chapman & Zachary Kaplan & Chase Potter, 2024. "Disclosure specificity: Evidence from book‐to‐bill ratios," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(3-4), pages 691-716, March.
    17. Susan Albring & Monica Banyi & Dan Dhaliwal & Raynolde Pereira, 2016. "Does the Firm Information Environment Influence Financing Decisions? A Test Using Disclosure Regulation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(2), pages 456-478, February.
    18. Li, Tianpei (Constance) & Walton, Stephanie, 2023. "Is there a dark side of competition? Product market competition and auditor-client contracting," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    19. Bulent Guler & Yasin Kürsat Önder & Temel Taskin, 2024. "Sovereign Debt Disclosure," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 24/1094, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    20. Liping Wang & Yuqi Shang & Shuqin Li & Chuang Li, 2023. "Environmental Information Disclosure-Environmental Costs Nexus: Evidence from Heavy Pollution Industry in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Environmental information disclosure; Green transformation; Green innovation; Market competition; Heavily polluting companies; U-shaped;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C12 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Hypothesis Testing: General
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
    • L51 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Economics of Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s10668-023-04328-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.