IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jbfnac/v50y2023i9-10p1808-1835.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regulation Fair Disclosure and the timeliness of long‐horizon management forecasts

Author

Listed:
  • Helen Hurwitz
  • Yan Sun

Abstract

We examine the effect of Regulation Fair Disclosure (hereafter Reg FD) on the timeliness of long‐horizon management forecasts of annual earnings, especially those conveying bad news. We expect that managers are less timely in issuing bad news forecasts than good news forecasts prior to Reg FD when they can disclose bad news to selected analysts and institutional investors privately. As Reg FD prohibits private disclosures of material information, managers are expected to accelerate the issuance of long‐horizon bad news forecasts after Reg FD due to concerns of litigation risk from institutional investors and loss of analyst coverage, leading to a decrease in timeliness asymmetry between bad news and good news forecasts. We also expect that the effect of Reg FD is stronger among firms with lower ex‐ante litigation risk or higher information asymmetry as they are more likely to withhold bad news prior to Reg FD. In addition, we expect that investors and analysts react more to bad news forecasts than to good news forecasts prior to Reg FD, and this asymmetry decreases after Reg FD. Our results are consistent with our predictions and suggest that managers provide long‐horizon forecasts conveying bad news more timely after Reg FD.

Suggested Citation

  • Helen Hurwitz & Yan Sun, 2023. "Regulation Fair Disclosure and the timeliness of long‐horizon management forecasts," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(9-10), pages 1808-1835, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:50:y:2023:i:9-10:p:1808-1835
    DOI: 10.1111/jbfa.12677
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12677
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jbfa.12677?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:50:y:2023:i:9-10:p:1808-1835. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0306-686X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.