IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v24y2022i12d10.1007_s10668-021-01996-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating biomass production and carbon sequestration of poplar-based agroforestry systems in India

Author

Listed:
  • S. B. Chavan

    (CCS Haryana Agricultural University
    ICAR-National Institute of Abiotic Stress Management)

  • R. S. Dhillon

    (CCS Haryana Agricultural University)

  • Ajit

    (ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute)

  • R. H. Rizvi

    (RRS, ICAR-Central Soil Salinity Research Institute)

  • Chhavi Sirohi

    (CCS Haryana Agricultural University)

  • A. K. Handa

    (ICAR-Central Agroforestry Research Institute)

  • K. K. Bharadwaj

    (CCS Haryana Agricultural University)

  • Vishal Johar

    (CCS Haryana Agricultural University)

  • Tarun Kumar

    (CCS Haryana Agricultural University)

  • Pradyuman Singh

    (CCS Haryana Agricultural University)

  • Vijay Daneva

    (CCS Haryana Agricultural University)

  • Sushil Kumari

    (CCS Haryana Agricultural University)

Abstract

This study was conducted on 79 harvested poplar trees of eight-years-old planted at five spacing geometries (5 × 4 m, 10 × 2 m, 18 × 2 × 2 m, North–South and East–West boundary) to construct component-wise dry biomass (above + below ground) equations for estimating biomass & carbon sequestered. The complete data were randomly divided into two mutually exclusive and independent sets viz estimation-set (80%) to fit the model and validation-set (20%) to ascertain accuracy of the fitted model. DBH was found to be the most appropriate independent variate to construct best-fit biomass equations with growth attributes. Among various attempted functions (linear, allometric, logistic, Gompertz, Chapman and exponential), allometric function i.e., Total Biomass = 0.2575*DBH(2.191) (R2Adj = 0.97, RMS = 925.71 and AIC = 427.87) was found to be the best-fit. The total dry biomass production of poplar varied from 69.90 to 207.98 Mg ha−1 in aboveground and 13.46 to 36.69 Mg ha−1 in belowground in five planting geometries. Total carbon storage (above + below ground) under various spacings viz 5 × 4 m, 10 × 2 m, 18 × 2 × 2 m, North–South and East–West boundary poplar were 112.48, 101.80, 84.87, 77.28 and 38.84 Mg C ha−1, respectively. The carbon sequestration rate was observed to be higher in 5 × 4 m (14.09 Mg C ha−1 yr−1) closely followed by 10 × 2 m (12.61 Mg C ha−1 yr−1), 18 × 2 × 2 m (10.50 Mg C ha−1 yr−1),E–West (9.56 Mg C ha−1 yr−1) and North–South plantation (4.80 Mg C ha−1 yr−1). Keeping in view, regionally derived allometric equations contribute to limiting the uncertainty in the estimation of biomass and carbon sequestration, which may be helpful to monitoring, reporting and verification (MRV) needs in carbon management policies.

Suggested Citation

  • S. B. Chavan & R. S. Dhillon & Ajit & R. H. Rizvi & Chhavi Sirohi & A. K. Handa & K. K. Bharadwaj & Vishal Johar & Tarun Kumar & Pradyuman Singh & Vijay Daneva & Sushil Kumari, 2022. "Estimating biomass production and carbon sequestration of poplar-based agroforestry systems in India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(12), pages 13493-13521, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:24:y:2022:i:12:d:10.1007_s10668-021-01996-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-021-01996-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-021-01996-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-021-01996-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. United Nations UN, 2015. "Transforming our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development," Working Papers id:7559, eSocialSciences.
    2. Bojana Bajželj & Keith S. Richards & Julian M. Allwood & Pete Smith & John S. Dennis & Elizabeth Curmi & Christopher A. Gilligan, 2014. "Importance of food-demand management for climate mitigation," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 4(10), pages 924-929, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sanjani Salunkhe & Sachin Nandgude & Mukesh Tiwari & Harshal Bhange & Sangram B. Chavan, 2023. "Land Suitability Planning for Sustainable Mango Production in Vulnerable Region Using Geospatial Multi-Criteria Decision Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ancuta Isbasoiu & Pierre-Alain Jayet & Stéphane De Cara, 2021. "Increasing food production and mitigating agricultural greenhouse gas emissions in the European Union: impacts of carbon pricing and calorie production targeting," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 23(2), pages 409-440, April.
    2. Beatrice Garske & Katharine Heyl & Felix Ekardt & Lea Moana Weber & Wiktoria Gradzka, 2020. "Challenges of Food Waste Governance: An Assessment of European Legislation on Food Waste and Recommendations for Improvement by Economic Instruments," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-23, July.
    3. Paulina Schiappacasse & Bernhard Müller & Le Thuy Linh, 2019. "Towards Responsible Aggregate Mining in Vietnam," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-15, August.
    4. Pina Puntillo, 2023. "Circular economy business models: Towards achieving sustainable development goals in the waste management sector—Empirical evidence and theoretical implications," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 941-954, March.
    5. Schlör, Holger & Venghaus, Sandra & Hake, Jürgen-Friedrich, 2018. "The FEW-Nexus city index – Measuring urban resilience," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 382-392.
    6. Jean-Louis Combes & Alexandru Minea & Pegdéwendé Nestor Sawadogo, 2019. "Assessing the effects of combating illicit financial flows on domestic tax revenue mobilization in developing countries," CERDI Working papers halshs-02019073, HAL.
    7. Nelson, Ewan & Warren, Peter, 2020. "UK transport decoupling: On track for clean growth in transport?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 39-51.
    8. Ibrahim Ari & Muammer Koc, 2018. "Sustainable Financing for Sustainable Development: Understanding the Interrelations between Public Investment and Sovereign Debt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-25, October.
    9. R. Ebrahimi & S. Choobchian & H. Farhadian & I. Goli & E. Farmandeh & H. Azadi, 2022. "Investigating the effect of vocational education and training on rural women’s empowerment," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-11, December.
    10. Benjamin Nölting & Bettina König & Anne B. Zimmermann & Antonietta Di Giulio & Martina Schäfer & Flurina Schneider, 2022. "Dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic: an opportunity to reflect on sustainability research," NachhaltigkeitsManagementForum | Sustainability Management Forum, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 11-27, December.
    11. Rashmi Jaipal, 2017. "Psychology at the Crossroads," Psychology and Developing Societies, , vol. 29(2), pages 125-159, September.
    12. Bárbara Galleli & Elder Semprebon & Joyce Aparecida Ramos dos Santos & Noah Emanuel Brito Teles & Mateus Santos de Freitas-Martins & Raquel Teodoro da Silva Onevetch, 2021. "Institutional Pressures, Sustainable Development Goals and COVID-19: How Are Organisations Engaging?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, November.
    13. Sagarika Dey & Priyanka Devi, 2019. "Impact of TVET on Labour Market Outcomes and Women’s Empowerment in Rural Areas: A Case Study from Cachar District, Assam," Indian Journal of Human Development, , vol. 13(3), pages 357-371, December.
    14. Rostami-Tabar, Bahman & Ali, Mohammad M. & Hong, Tao & Hyndman, Rob J. & Porter, Michael D. & Syntetos, Aris, 2022. "Forecasting for social good," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 1245-1257.
    15. Maria Sassi, 2020. "A SEM Approach to the Direct and Indirect Links between WaSH Services and Access to Food in Countries in Protracted Crises: The Case of Western Bahr-el-Ghazal State, South Sudan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-13, November.
    16. Christina Tsouti & Christina Papadaskalopoulou & Angeliki Konsta & Panagiotis Andrikopoulos & Margarita Panagiotopoulou & Sofia Papadaki & Christos Boukouvalas & Magdalini Krokida & Katerina Valta, 2023. "Investigating the Environmental Benefits of Novel Films for the Packaging of Fresh Tomatoes Enriched with Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Compounds through Life Cycle Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-22, May.
    17. Olga Stepanova & Magdalena Romanov, 2021. "Urban Planning as a Strategy to Implement Social Sustainability Policy Goals? The Case of Temporary Housing for Immigrants in Gothenburg, Sweden," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    18. Alberto Bertossi & Stefania Troiano & Francesco Marangon, 2022. "Where is sustainability? An assessment of vending products," RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA', FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(1), pages 155-180.
    19. Michel, Hanno, 2020. "From local to global: The role of knowledge, transfer, and capacity building for successful energy transitions," Discussion Papers, Research Group Digital Mobility and Social Differentiation SP III 2020-603, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    20. Hervé Corvellec & Johan Hultman & Anne Jerneck & Susanne Arvidsson & Johan Ekroos & Niklas Wahlberg & Timothy W. Luke, 2021. "Resourcification: A non‐essentialist theory of resources for sustainable development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(6), pages 1249-1256, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:24:y:2022:i:12:d:10.1007_s10668-021-01996-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.