IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/elmark/v31y2021i3d10.1007_s12525-020-00398-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feature subset selection for predicting the success of crowdfunding project campaigns

Author

Listed:
  • Michael J. Ryoba

    (University of Shanghai for Science and Technology)

  • Shaojian Qu

    (University of Shanghai for Science and Technology)

  • Yongyi Zhou

    (University of Shanghai for Science and Technology)

Abstract

Statistics from crowdfunding platforms show that a small percent of crowdfunding projects succeed in securing funds. This makes project creators eager to know the probability of success of their campaign and the features that contribute to its success before launching it on crowdfunding platforms. The existing literature focuses on examining success probability using the entire list of identified projects features. For situations for which project creators have limited resources to invest on the required project features, the list suggested by previous researchers is somewhat large and gives a small success probability. A minimal number of features that predict success with a higher probability can benefit project creators by providing them with insight and guidance in investing their limited resources. This paper presents a metaheuristic whale optimization algorithm (WOA) in the crowdfunding context to perform a complete search of a subset of features that have a high success contribution power. Experiments were conducted using WOA with the K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) classifier on a Kickstarter dataset. Our approach obtains a subset of 9 features that predict the success of project campaigns with an accuracy (F-score) of 90.28% (90.11%), which is an increase (F-score) of 22.23% (21.61%) than when a complete set of features is used. The findings of this study contribute knowledge to various crowdfunding stakeholders, as they will provide new insights regarding a subset of essential features th4at influence the success of project campaigns with high accuracy.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael J. Ryoba & Shaojian Qu & Yongyi Zhou, 2021. "Feature subset selection for predicting the success of crowdfunding project campaigns," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(3), pages 671-684, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:elmark:v:31:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s12525-020-00398-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s12525-020-00398-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12525-020-00398-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12525-020-00398-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rajagopal, 2014. "The Human Factors," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Architecting Enterprise, chapter 9, pages 225-249, Palgrave Macmillan.
    2. Mi (Jamie) Zhou & Baozhou Lu & Weiguo (Patrick) Fan & G. Alan Wang, 2018. "Project description and crowdfunding success: an exploratory study," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 259-274, April.
    3. Ivelin Elenchev & Aleksandar Vasilev, 2019. "Forecasting the Success Rate of Reward Based Crowdfunding Projects," Managing Global Transitions, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 17(1 (Spring), pages 51-77.
    4. Mi (Jamie) Zhou & Baozhou Lu & Weiguo (Patrick) Fan & G. Alan Wang, 0. "Project description and crowdfunding success: an exploratory study," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-16.
    5. Broderick Crawford & Ricardo Soto & Gino Astorga & José García & Carlos Castro & Fernando Paredes, 2017. "Putting Continuous Metaheuristics to Work in Binary Search Spaces," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-19, May.
    6. Mollick, Ethan, 2014. "The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 1-16.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ransome Epie Bawack & Samuel Fosso Wamba & Kevin Daniel André Carillo & Shahriar Akter, 2022. "Artificial intelligence in E-Commerce: a bibliometric study and literature review," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(1), pages 297-338, March.
    2. Rainer Alt, 2021. "Electronic Markets on robotics," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(3), pages 465-471, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chan, Ho Fai & Moy, Naomi & Schaffner, Markus & Torgler, Benno, 2021. "The effects of money saliency and sustainability orientation on reward based crowdfunding success," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 443-455.
    2. Qianzhou Du & Jing Li & Yanqing Du & G. Alan Wang & Weiguo Fan, 2021. "Predicting crowdfunding project success based on backers' language preferences," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(12), pages 1558-1574, December.
    3. Michael J. Ryoba & Shaojian Qu & Ying Ji & Deqiang Qu, 2020. "The Right Time for Crowd Communication during Campaigns for Sustainable Success of Crowdfunding: Evidence from Kickstarter Platform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-22, September.
    4. Bagheri, Afsaneh & Chitsazan, Hasti & Ebrahimi, Ashkan, 2019. "Crowdfunding motivations: A focus on donors' perspectives," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 218-232.
    5. Chan, C.S. Richard & Park, Haemin Dennis & Huang, Julie Y. & Parhankangas, Annaleena, 2020. "Less is more? Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between readability and screening evaluations across pitch competition and crowdfunding contexts," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 14(C).
    6. Roman Lukyanenko & Andrea Wiggins & Holly K. Rosser, 0. "Citizen Science: An Information Quality Research Frontier," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-23.
    7. Duan, Yang & Hsieh, Tien-Shih & Wang, Ray R. & Wang, Zhihong, 2020. "Entrepreneurs' facial trustworthiness, gender, and crowdfunding success," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    8. Saif Ullah & Yulin Zhou, 2020. "Gender, Anonymity and Team: What Determines Crowdfunding Success on Kickstarter," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-26, April.
    9. Felipe, Israel José dos Santos & Mendes-Da-Silva, Wesley & Leal, Cristiana Cerqueira & Braun Santos, Danilo, 2022. "Reward crowdfunding campaigns: Time-to-success analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 214-228.
    10. Zhao, Liang & Shneor, Rotem & Sun, Zhe, 2022. "Skin in the game: Self-funding and reward crowdfunding success," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 89-100.
    11. Susana Bernardino & J. Freitas Santos, 2020. "Crowdfunding: An Exploratory Study on Knowledge, Benefits and Barriers Perceived by Young Potential Entrepreneurs," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, April.
    12. Xiaobei Liang & Xiaojuan Hu & Jiang Jiang, 2020. "Research on the Effects of Information Description on Crowdfunding Success within a Sustainable Economy—The Perspective of Information Communication," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-36, January.
    13. Messeni Petruzzelli, Antonio & Natalicchio, Angelo & Panniello, Umberto & Roma, Paolo, 2019. "Understanding the crowdfunding phenomenon and its implications for sustainability," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 138-148.
    14. Roman Lukyanenko & Andrea Wiggins & Holly K. Rosser, 2020. "Citizen Science: An Information Quality Research Frontier," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 961-983, August.
    15. Chan, C.S. Richard & Pethe, Charuta & Skiena, Steven, 2021. "Natural language processing versus rule-based text analysis: Comparing BERT score and readability indices to predict crowdfunding outcomes," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 16(C).
    16. Jascha-Alexander Koch & Michael Siering, 2019. "The recipe of successful crowdfunding campaigns," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 29(4), pages 661-679, December.
    17. Tuo Gladys & Yi Feng & Wang Wenxin & Sarpong Solomon, 2020. "The Second Round Resource Acquisition of Entrepreneurial Crowdfunded Ventures: The Relevance of Campaign and Project Implementation Performance Outcomes," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 10(3), pages 1-21, July.
    18. Kovacs, Attila, 2018. "Gender Differences in Equity Crowdfunding," OSF Preprints 5pcmb, Center for Open Science.
    19. Naomi Moy & Ho Fai Chan & Benno Torgler, 2018. "How much is too much? The effects of information quantity on crowdfunding performance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, March.
    20. Etienne Schraven & Elco van Burg & Marco van Gelderen & Enno Masurel, 2020. "Predictions of Crowdfunding Campaign Success: The Influence of First Impressions on Accuracy and Positivity," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-16, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:elmark:v:31:y:2021:i:3:d:10.1007_s12525-020-00398-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.