IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/demogr/v55y2018i2d10.1007_s13524-018-0661-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

If Science Had Come First: A Billion Person Fable for the Ages (A Reply to Comments)

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Goodkind

    () (Independent Researcher)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Goodkind, 2018. "If Science Had Come First: A Billion Person Fable for the Ages (A Reply to Comments)," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 55(2), pages 743-768, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:demogr:v:55:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s13524-018-0661-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s13524-018-0661-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13524-018-0661-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yong Cai, 2010. "China's Below‐Replacement Fertility: Government Policy or Socioeconomic Development?," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 36(3), pages 419-440, September.
    2. Susan Greenhalgh, 2003. "Science, Modernity, and the Making of China's One‐Child Policy," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 29(2), pages 163-196, June.
    3. Daniel Goodkind, 1993. "New zodiacal influences on chinese family formation: Taiwan, 1976," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 30(2), pages 127-142, May.
    4. Oster, Emily, 2012. "HIV and sexual behavior change: Why not Africa?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 35-49.
    5. Zhongwei Zhao & Wei Chen, 2011. "China’s far below replacement fertility and its long-term impact: Comments on the preliminary results of the 2010 census," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 25(26), pages 819-836.
    6. repec:cai:poeine:pope_1103_0519 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. M. Merli & Herbert Smith, 2002. "Has the Chinese family planning policy been successful in changing fertility preferences?," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 39(3), pages 557-572, August.
    8. Daniel Goodkind, 2011. "Child Underreporting, Fertility, and Sex Ratio Imbalance in China," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 48(1), pages 291-316, February.
    9. World Bank, 2017. "World Development Indicators 2017," World Bank Publications, The World Bank, number 26447.
    10. Junsen Zhang, 2017. "The Evolution of China's One-Child Policy and Its Effects on Family Outcomes," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 31(1), pages 141-160, Winter.
    11. William Lavely & Ronald Freedman, 1990. "The Origins of the Chinese Fertility Decline," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 27(3), pages 357-367, August.
    12. Barbara Entwisle, 1989. "Measuring components of family planning program effort," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 26(1), pages 53-76, February.
    13. Daniel Goodkind, 2017. "The Astonishing Population Averted by China’s Birth Restrictions: Estimates, Nightmares, and Reprogrammed Ambitions," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 54(4), pages 1375-1400, August.
    14. Susan Greenhalgh, 2012. "On the Crafting of Population Knowledge," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 38(1), pages 121-131, March.
    15. Yilin Nie & Robert J. Wyman, 2005. "The One‐Child Policy in Shanghai: Acceptance and Internalization," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 31(2), pages 313-336, June.
    16. Daniel Goodkind, 2015. "The claim that China's fertility restrictions contributed to the use of prenatal sex selection: A sceptical reappraisal," Population Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 69(3), pages 263-279, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:demogr:v:55:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s13524-018-0661-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla) or (Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.