IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/compst/v40y2025i1d10.1007_s00180-024-01479-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A difference-based method for testing no effect in nonparametric regression

Author

Listed:
  • Zhijian Li

    (BNU-HKBU United International College)

  • Tiejun Tong

    (Hong Kong Baptist University)

  • Yuedong Wang

    (University of California)

Abstract

The paper proposes a novel difference-based method for testing the hypothesis of no relationship between the dependent and independent variables. We construct three test statistics for nonparametric regression with Gaussian and non-Gaussian random errors. These test statistics have the standard normal as the asymptotic null distribution. Furthermore, we show that these tests can detect local alternatives that converge to the null hypothesis at a rate close to $$n^{-1/2}$$ n - 1 / 2 previously achieved only by the residual-based tests. We also propose a permutation test as a flexible alternative. Our difference-based method does not require estimating the mean function or its first derivative, making it easy to implement and computationally efficient. Simulation results demonstrate that our new tests are more powerful than existing methods, especially when the sample size is small. The usefulness of the proposed tests is also illustrated using two real data examples.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhijian Li & Tiejun Tong & Yuedong Wang, 2025. "A difference-based method for testing no effect in nonparametric regression," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 153-176, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:40:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s00180-024-01479-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s00180-024-01479-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00180-024-01479-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00180-024-01479-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wenceslao González-Manteiga & Rosa Crujeiras, 2013. "Rejoinder on: An updated review of Goodness-of-Fit tests for regression models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 22(3), pages 442-447, September.
    2. Dennis Cox & Eunmee Koh, 1989. "A smoothing spline based test of model adequacy in polynomial regression," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 41(2), pages 383-400, June.
    3. Wenceslao González-Manteiga & Rosa Crujeiras, 2013. "An updated review of Goodness-of-Fit tests for regression models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 22(3), pages 361-411, September.
    4. McManus, Douglas A., 1991. "Who Invented Local Power Analysis?," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(2), pages 265-268, June.
    5. R. L. Eubank, 2000. "Testing for No Effect by Cosine Series Methods," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 27(4), pages 747-763, December.
    6. Yatchew, A., 1999. "An elementary nonparametric differencing test of equality of regression functions," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 271-278, March.
    7. Tiejun Tong & Yuedong Wang, 2005. "Estimating residual variance in nonparametric regression using least squares," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 92(4), pages 821-830, December.
    8. Einmahl, J.H.J. & van Keilegom, I., 2006. "Tests for Independence in Nonparametric Regression," Other publications TiSEM 0c6f2c43-aa7d-45c1-9d43-7, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    9. Yatchew,Adonis, 2003. "Semiparametric Regression for the Applied Econometrician," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521812832, June.
    10. Ingrid Keilegom & Wenceslao González Manteiga & César Sánchez Sellero, 2008. "Goodness-of-fit tests in parametric regression based on the estimation of the error distribution," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 17(2), pages 401-415, August.
    11. Juei-Chao Chen, 1994. "Testing for no effect in nonparametric regression via spline smoothing techniques," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 46(2), pages 251-265, June.
    12. Chin-Shang Li, 2012. "Testing for no effect via splines," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 343-357, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xu Guo & Wangli Xu & Lixing Zhu, 2015. "Model checking for parametric regressions with response missing at random," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 67(2), pages 229-259, April.
    2. Colling, Benjamin & Van Keilegom, Ingrid, 2016. "Goodness-of-fit tests in semiparametric transformation models using the integrated regression function," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2016031, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    3. Escanciano, Juan Carlos & Pardo-Fernandez, Juan Carlos & Van Keilegom, Ingrid, 2015. "Asymptotic distribution-free tests for semiparametric regressions," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2015001, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    4. Cuizhen Niu & Lixing Zhu, 2018. "A robust adaptive-to-model enhancement test for parametric single-index models," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 70(5), pages 1013-1045, October.
    5. Kloodt, Nick & Neumeyer, Natalie, 2020. "Specification tests in semiparametric transformation models — A multiplier bootstrap approach," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    6. Colling, Benjamin & Van Keilegom, Ingrid, 2017. "Goodness-of-fit tests in semiparametric transformation models using the integrated regression function," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 10-30.
    7. Hušková, Marie & Meintanis, Simos G. & Pretorius, Charl, 2020. "Tests for validity of the semiparametric heteroskedastic transformation model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    8. Chin-Shang Li, 2012. "Testing for no effect via splines," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 343-357, June.
    9. Pedro H. C. Sant'Anna & Xiaojun Song & Qi Xu, 2022. "Covariate distribution balance via propensity scores," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(6), pages 1093-1120, September.
    10. Mason David M. & Eubank Randy, 2012. "Moderate deviations and intermediate efficiency for lack-of-fit tests," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 29(2), pages 175-187, June.
    11. Adam D. Bull, 2015. "Semimartingale detection and goodness-of-fit tests," Papers 1506.00088, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2016.
    12. Xu Guo & Gao-Rong Li & Michael McAleer & Wing-Keung Wong, 2018. "Specification Testing of Production in a Stochastic Frontier Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-10, August.
    13. Enno Mammen & Jens Perch Nielsen & Michael Scholz & Stefan Sperlich, 2019. "Conditional Variance Forecasts for Long-Term Stock Returns," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-22, November.
    14. José María Sarabia & Faustino Prieto & Vanesa Jordá & Stefan Sperlich, 2020. "A Note on Combining Machine Learning with Statistical Modeling for Financial Data Analysis," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-14, April.
    15. Eduardo García‐Portugués & Javier Álvarez‐Liébana & Gonzalo Álvarez‐Pérez & Wenceslao González‐Manteiga, 2021. "A goodness‐of‐fit test for the functional linear model with functional response," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 48(2), pages 502-528, June.
    16. A. Meilán-Vila & R. Fernández-Casal & R. M. Crujeiras & M. Francisco-Fernández, 2021. "A computational validation for nonparametric assessment of spatial trends," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 2939-2965, December.
    17. Junmin Liu & Deli Zhu & Luoyao Yu & Xuehu Zhu, 2023. "Specification testing of partially linear single-index models: a groupwise dimension reduction-based adaptive-to-model approach," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 32(1), pages 232-262, March.
    18. Di Leo, Senatro & Caramuta, Pietro & Curci, Paola & Cosmi, Carmelina, 2020. "Regression analysis for energy demand projection: An application to TIMES-Basilicata and TIMES-Italy energy models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    19. G. I. Rivas-Martínez & M. D. Jiménez-Gamero & J. L. Moreno-Rebollo, 2019. "A two-sample test for the error distribution in nonparametric regression based on the characteristic function," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 60(4), pages 1369-1395, August.
    20. Guo, Xu & Song, Lianlian & Fang, Yun & Zhu, Lixing, 2019. "Model checking for general linear regression with nonignorable missing response," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 1-12.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:40:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s00180-024-01479-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.