IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/compst/v36y2021i2d10.1007_s00180-020-01049-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Variables skip-lot sampling plans on the basis of process capability index for products with a low fraction of defectives

Author

Listed:
  • Chien-Wei Wu

    (National Tsing Hua University)

  • Ming-Hung Shu

    (National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology
    Kaohsiung Medical University)

  • Pei-An Wang

    (National Tsing Hua University)

  • Bi-Min Hsu

    (Cheng Shiu University)

Abstract

The skip-lot sampling plan (SkSP) is employed in supply chains to decrease the amount of inspection required for submitted lots when they have demonstrated a succession of lots with excellent quality. As only some fractions of lots are examined, the cost of inspection is reduced. With the current abundance of high-yield products, however, the majority of SkSP schemes have been utilized for attributes testing, which does not fully reveal the SkSP’s economic advantages. Thus, on the basis of the process capability index Cpk, the variables SkSP with single sampling as a reference plan (Cpk-SkSP-2) was developed. With management of the lot’s quality and tolerable risks agreeable to both the supplier and the buyer, the Cpk-SkSP-2 were incorporated with acceptance probabilities (rather than asymptotic approximations), which yielded the exact sampling distribution of the Cpk estimator at the specified quality standards. Furthermore, the equilibrium probability for the acceptance of Cpk-SkSP-2 was derived from a Markov chain technique. These treatments enable minimization of the average number of samples required to render more reliable and optimal plan parameters for the inspection of products with a low fraction of defectives. The results are compared with the variables Cpk-based single sampling plans. Finally, a graphical user interface was built on the basis of our proposed Cpk-SkSP-2 procedures and methodologies to facilitate data input, plan selection, criteria computation, and decision-making in practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Chien-Wei Wu & Ming-Hung Shu & Pei-An Wang & Bi-Min Hsu, 2021. "Variables skip-lot sampling plans on the basis of process capability index for products with a low fraction of defectives," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 1391-1413, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:36:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s00180-020-01049-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s00180-020-01049-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00180-020-01049-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00180-020-01049-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amy Lee & Chien-Wei Wu & Yen-Wen Chen, 2016. "A modified variables repetitive group sampling plan with the consideration of preceding lots information," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 355-373, March.
    2. R. Vijayaraghavan & V. Soundararajan, 1998. "Design and evaluation of skip-lot sampling inspection plans with double-sampling plan as the reference plan," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 341-348.
    3. Pearn, W.L. & Wu, Chien-Wei, 2006. "Critical acceptance values and sample sizes of a variables sampling plan for very low fraction of defectives," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 90-101, January.
    4. Lepore, A. & Palumbo, B. & Castagliola, P., 2018. "A note on decision making method for product acceptance based on process capability indices Cpk and Cpmk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(1), pages 393-398.
    5. Wu, Chien-Wei & Pearn, W.L. & Kotz, Samuel, 2009. "An overview of theory and practice on process capability indices for quality assurance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(2), pages 338-359, February.
    6. Wu, Chien-Wei & Aslam, Muhammad & Jun, Chi-Hyuck, 2012. "Variables sampling inspection scheme for resubmitted lots based on the process capability index Cpk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 217(3), pages 560-566.
    7. Pearn, W.L. & Wu, Chien-Wei, 2007. "An effective decision making method for product acceptance," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 12-21, February.
    8. Wu, Chien-Wei & Pearn, W.L., 2008. "A variables sampling plan based on Cpmk for product acceptance determination," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(2), pages 549-560, January.
    9. Amy H. I. Lee & Chien-Wei Wu & Yen-Wen Chen, 2016. "A modified variables repetitive group sampling plan with the consideration of preceding lots information," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 355-373, March.
    10. S. Balamurali & Chi-Hyuck Jun, 2009. "Designing of a variables two-plan system by minimizing the average sample number," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(10), pages 1159-1172.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amy H. I. Lee & Chien-Wei Wu & Yen-Wen Chen, 2016. "A modified variables repetitive group sampling plan with the consideration of preceding lots information," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 355-373, March.
    2. Amy Lee & Chien-Wei Wu & Yen-Wen Chen, 2016. "A modified variables repetitive group sampling plan with the consideration of preceding lots information," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 355-373, March.
    3. Chien-Wei Wu & Zih-Huei Wang, 2017. "Developing a variables multiple dependent state sampling plan with simultaneous consideration of process yield and quality loss," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(8), pages 2351-2364, April.
    4. Wu, Chien-Wei & Aslam, Muhammad & Jun, Chi-Hyuck, 2012. "Variables sampling inspection scheme for resubmitted lots based on the process capability index Cpk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 217(3), pages 560-566.
    5. Wu, Chien-Wei, 2012. "An efficient inspection scheme for variables based on Taguchi capability index," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(1), pages 116-122.
    6. Lepore, A. & Palumbo, B. & Castagliola, P., 2018. "A note on decision making method for product acceptance based on process capability indices Cpk and Cpmk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(1), pages 393-398.
    7. Kuen-Suan Chen & Tsang-Chuan Chang, 2022. "Fuzzy testing model for the lifetime performance of products under consideration with exponential distribution," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 312(1), pages 87-98, May.
    8. Michele Scagliarini, 2022. "A sequential test and a sequential sampling plan based on the process capability index Cpmk," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 1523-1550, July.
    9. Li, Der-Chiang & Lin, Liang-Sian, 2013. "A new approach to assess product lifetime performance for small data sets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(2), pages 290-298.
    10. Ching-Ho Yen & Chun-Chia Lee & Kuo-Hung Lo & Yeou-Ren Shiue & Shu-Hua Li, 2020. "A Rectifying Acceptance Sampling Plan Based on the Process Capability Index," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-12, January.
    11. Muhammad Aslam & Mohammed Albassam, 2019. "Inspection Plan Based on the Process Capability Index Using the Neutrosophic Statistical Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-10, July.
    12. To-Cheng Wang & Chien-Wei Wu & Ming-Hung Shu, 2022. "A variables-type multiple-dependent-state sampling plan based on the lifetime performance index under a Weibull distribution," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(1), pages 381-399, April.
    13. Shih-Wen Liu & Chien-Wei Wu, 2016. "A quick switching sampling system by variables for controlling lot fraction nonconforming," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(6), pages 1839-1849, March.
    14. Bouslah, B. & Gharbi, A. & Pellerin, R., 2016. "Integrated production, sampling quality control and maintenance of deteriorating production systems with AOQL constraint," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 110-126.
    15. Peruchi, Rogério Santana & Balestrassi, Pedro Paulo & de Paiva, Anderson Paulo & Ferreira, João Roberto & de Santana Carmelossi, Michele, 2013. "A new multivariate gage R&R method for correlated characteristics," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(1), pages 301-315.
    16. Shardrom Johnson & Jinwu Han & Yuanchen Liu & Li Chen & Xinlin Wu, 2018. "Hybrid Approach with Improved Genetic Algorithm and Simulated Annealing for Thesis Sampling," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-15, July.
    17. Fernández, Arturo J. & Pérez-González, Carlos J. & Aslam, Muhammad & Jun, Chi-Hyuck, 2011. "Design of progressively censored group sampling plans for Weibull distributions: An optimization problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 211(3), pages 525-532, June.
    18. Michele Scagliarini, 2011. "Multivariate process capability using principal component analysis in the presence of measurement errors," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 95(2), pages 113-128, June.
    19. Fernández, Arturo J., 2017. "Economic lot sampling inspection from defect counts with minimum conditional value-at-risk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(2), pages 573-580.
    20. Kuen-Suan Chen & Tsun-Hung Huang & Ruey-Chyn Tsaur & Wen-Yang Kao, 2022. "Fuzzy Evaluation Models for Accuracy and Precision Indices," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(21), pages 1-12, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:36:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s00180-020-01049-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.