IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/climat/v178y2025i2d10.1007_s10584-025-03857-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The cycle of underrepresentation: structural and institutional factors limiting the representation of Global South authors and knowledge in the IPCC

Author

Listed:
  • Diana Rucavado Rojas
  • Julio C. Postigo

    (Indiana University)

Abstract

Since the first Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Report evaluating scientific knowledge about climate in 1990, there has been geographic inequality in authorship and content. Using survey data (n = 62), and interviews (n = 8) with IPCC authors from the Global South, we identify institutional and structural factors that limit their nomination, selection, and ability to contribute to the IPCC reports. These barriers create a cycle of underrepresentation, where Global South research is systematically excluded from IPCC reports. Economic inequality among countries is a major driver of this North-South divide in knowledge production. Bridging this gap requires multiple institutional transformations, such as transforming countries’ investment in Research and Development (R&D) and expanding the ways knowledge is produced within countries and by the IPCC. Undertaking these transformative actions will improve the quality and legitimacy of IPCC products for policy making.

Suggested Citation

  • Diana Rucavado Rojas & Julio C. Postigo, 2025. "The cycle of underrepresentation: structural and institutional factors limiting the representation of Global South authors and knowledge in the IPCC," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 178(2), pages 1-11, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:178:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10584-025-03857-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10584-025-03857-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10584-025-03857-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10584-025-03857-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carolina E. Adler & Gertrude Hirsch Hadorn, 2014. "The IPCC and treatment of uncertainties: topics and sources of dissensus," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(5), pages 663-676, September.
    2. Flurina Schneider & Zarina Patel & Katsia Paulavets & Tobias Buser & Jacqueline Kado & Stefanie Burkhart, 2023. "Fostering transdisciplinary research for sustainability in the Global South: Pathways to impact for funding programmes," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Richard Tol, 2011. "Regulating knowledge monopolies: the case of the IPCC," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 108(4), pages 827-839, October.
    4. Andreas Bjurström & Merritt Polk, 2011. "Physical and economic bias in climate change research: a scientometric study of IPCC Third Assessment Report," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 108(1), pages 1-22, September.
    5. Yamineva, Yulia, 2017. "Lessons from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change on inclusiveness across geographies and stakeholders," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 244-251.
    6. Malgorzata Blicharska & Richard J. Smithers & Magdalena Kuchler & Ganesh K. Agrawal & José M. Gutiérrez & Ahmed Hassanali & Saleemul Huq & Silvia H. Koller & Sugata Marjit & Hassan M. Mshinda & Hj Has, 2017. "Steps to overcome the North–South divide in research relevant to climate change policy and practice," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 7(1), pages 21-27, January.
    7. Kees van der Geest & Koko Warner, 2020. "Loss and damage in the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (Working Group II): a text-mining analysis," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(6), pages 729-742, July.
    8. Silke Beck & Martin Mahony, 2018. "The IPCC and the new map of science and politics," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(6), November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jonathan Ignatowski & Jon Rosales, 2013. "Identifying the exposure of two subsistence villages in Alaska to climate change using traditional ecological knowledge," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 121(2), pages 285-299, November.
    2. Andreas Bjurström & Merritt Polk, 2011. "Climate change and interdisciplinarity: a co-citation analysis of IPCC Third Assessment Report," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 87(3), pages 525-550, June.
    3. Lea Berrang‐Ford & Friederike Döbbe & Ruth Garside & Neal Haddaway & William F. Lamb & Jan C. Minx & Wolfgang Viechtbauer & Vivian Welch & Howard White, 2020. "Editorial: Evidence synthesis for accelerated learning on climate solutions," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), December.
    4. Pamela McElwee, 2025. "A tale of two panels: learning and coordinating across IPCC, IPBES, and other science-policy interfaces," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 178(3), pages 1-20, March.
    5. Mary Sanford & James Painter & Taha Yasseri & Jamie Lorimer, 2021. "Controversy around climate change reports: a case study of Twitter responses to the 2019 IPCC report on land," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 167(3), pages 1-25, August.
    6. Aleixandre-Benavent, Rafael & Aleixandre-Tudó, José Luis & Castelló-Cogollos, Lourdes & Aleixandre, José Luis, 2018. "Trends in global research in deforestation. A bibliometric analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 293-302.
    7. Gerlak, Andrea K. & Guido, Zack & Owen, Gigi & McGoffin, Mariana Sofia Rodriguez & Louder, Elena & Davies, Julia & Smith, Kelly Jay & Zimmer, Andy & Murveit, Anna M. & Meadow, Alison & Shrestha, Padme, 2023. "Stakeholder engagement in the co-production of knowledge for environmental decision-making," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    8. Hawkins, Maren M. & Dressel, Anne & Kendall, Nancy & Wendland, Claire & Hawkins, Stephen & Walker, Kimberly & Mkandawire, Elizabeth & Kirungi, Jackline & Kako, Peninnah & Mkandawire-Valhmu, Lucy, 2022. "The changing dynamics of community care and support in rural Malawi: The impact on Women's health and wellbeing at end of life," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    9. Richard S. J. Tol, 2016. "The Impacts Of Climate Change According To The Ipcc," Climate Change Economics (CCE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 7(01), pages 1-20, February.
    10. Vanessa J. Schweizer, 2020. "Reflections on cross-impact balances, a systematic method constructing global socio-technical scenarios for climate change research," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(4), pages 1705-1722, October.
    11. Louis J. Kotzé & Benoit Mayer & Harro van Asselt & Joana Setzer & Frank Biermann & Nicolas Celis & Sam Adelman & Bridget Lewis & Amanda Kennedy & Helen Arling & Birgit Peters, 2024. "Courts, climate litigation and the evolution of earth system law," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(1), pages 5-22, February.
    12. Kristian Fabbri & Jacopo Gaspari, 2021. "A Replicable Methodology to Evaluate Passive Façade Performance with SMA during the Architectural Design Process: A Case Study Application," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, September.
    13. Eric K. Chu & Gillian Bowser & Abby G. Frazier & Alyssa Quintyne & Linda Shi & Pamela McElwee, 2025. "Broadening diversity, equity, accessibility, and inclusion in the process and development of climate assessments," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 178(4), pages 1-11, April.
    14. Mazzarano, Matteo & Guastella, Gianni & Pareglio, Stefano & Xepapadeas, Anastasios & Borghesi, Simone, 2024. "“Carbon” boards and transition risk: Explicit and implicit exposure implications for total stock returns and dividends payouts," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    15. Jennifer Garard & Martin Kowarsch, 2017. "Objectives for Stakeholder Engagement in Global Environmental Assessments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-21, September.
    16. Andy Reisinger, 2011. "Interdisciplinarity: are we there yet?," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 108(1), pages 23-30, September.
    17. Pilpola, Sannamari & Lund, Peter D., 2020. "Analyzing the effects of uncertainties on the modelling of low-carbon energy system pathways," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    18. Tian-Yuan Huang & Liangping Ding & Yong-Qiang Yu & Lei Huang & Liying Yang, 2023. "From AR5 to AR6: exploring research advancement in climate change based on scientific evidence from IPCC WGI reports," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(9), pages 5227-5245, September.
    19. Estelle Fourat & Eric Blanchart & Miriam Cué Rio & Maria J Darias & Arona Diedhiou & Isabelle Droy & Frédéric Jacob & Pierre Janin & Marjorie Le Bars & Alissia Lourme-Ruiz & Insaf Mekki & Philippe Mér, 2024. "Holistic approaches to assess the sustainability of food systems in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review," Post-Print hal-04662942, HAL.
    20. Vincent Gitz & Alexandre Meybeck, 2011. "The establishment of the High Level Panel of Experts on food security and nutrition (HLPE). Shared, independent and comprehensive knowledge for international policy coherence in food security and nutr," CIRED Working Papers hal-00866427, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:178:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10584-025-03857-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.