IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/climat/v178y2025i3d10.1007_s10584-025-03869-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A tale of two panels: learning and coordinating across IPCC, IPBES, and other science-policy interfaces

Author

Listed:
  • Pamela McElwee

    (Rutgers University)

Abstract

The Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) has been operational since 2012, making it nearly twenty-five years younger than the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Inspired by the IPCC's success in raising awareness about climate change, IPBES aims to achieve the same for biodiversity. However, their approaches have diverged, particularly around incorporation of diverse knowledge systems, engagement with stakeholders, and coordination across science-policy platforms. This essay reflects on how IPBES and IPCC have approached their mandates and audiences, drawing on the author’s participation in both institutions, and making the argument that developing protocols to recognize and weave in diverse knowledges, bringing in new stakeholders and expanding communications, and engaging in creative coordination can strengthen the impact and reach of assessments. These practices can create new audiences and a stronger foundation for action, all valuable lessons for the IPCC's upcoming Seventh Assessment Report (AR7) cycle.

Suggested Citation

  • Pamela McElwee, 2025. "A tale of two panels: learning and coordinating across IPCC, IPBES, and other science-policy interfaces," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 178(3), pages 1-20, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:178:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10584-025-03869-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10584-025-03869-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10584-025-03869-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10584-025-03869-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Montana, Jasper, 2017. "Accommodating consensus and diversity in environmental knowledge production: Achieving closure through typologies in IPBES," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 20-27.
    2. E. Lisa F. Schipper & Navroz K. Dubash & Yacob Mulugetta, 2021. "Climate change research and the search for solutions: rethinking interdisciplinarity," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 168(3), pages 1-11, October.
    3. Yamineva, Yulia, 2017. "Lessons from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change on inclusiveness across geographies and stakeholders," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 244-251.
    4. Emma Frances Bloomfield & Chris Manktelow, 2021. "Climate communication and storytelling," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 167(3), pages 1-7, August.
    5. Ritodhi Chakraborty & Pasang Yangjee Sherpa, 2021. "From climate adaptation to climate justice: Critical reflections on the IPCC and Himalayan climate knowledges," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 167(3), pages 1-14, August.
    6. Pamela McElwee, 2021. "Anthropological engagements with integrated assessment modeling," Economic Anthropology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(1), pages 168-171, January.
    7. Obermeister, Noam, 2017. "From dichotomy to duality: Addressing interdisciplinary epistemological barriers to inclusive knowledge governance in global environmental assessments," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 80-86.
    8. Dunn, Gemma & Laing, Matthew, 2017. "Policy-makers perspectives on credibility, relevance and legitimacy (CRELE)," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 146-152.
    9. Simo Sarkki & Jari Niemelä & Rob Tinch & Sybille van den Hove & Allan Watt & Juliette Young, 2014. "Balancing credibility, relevance and legitimacy: A critical assessment of trade-offs in science–policy interfaces," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 41(2), pages 194-206.
    10. James D. Ford & Laura Cameron & Jennifer Rubis & Michelle Maillet & Douglas Nakashima & Ashlee Cunsolo Willox & Tristan Pearce, 2016. "Including indigenous knowledge and experience in IPCC assessment reports," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 6(4), pages 349-353, April.
    11. Hannah Hughes & Alice B. M. Vadrot, 2019. "Weighting the World: IPBES and the Struggle over Biocultural Diversity," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 19(2), pages 14-37, May.
    12. I. Díaz-Reviriego & E. Turnhout & S. Beck, 2019. "Participation and inclusiveness in the Intergovernmental Science–Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 2(6), pages 457-464, June.
    13. David W. Cash & Patricio G. Belloy, 2020. "Salience, Credibility and Legitimacy in a Rapidly Shifting World of Knowledge and Action," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-15, September.
    14. Alejandro Esguerra & Silke Beck & Rolf Lidskog, 2017. "Stakeholder Engagement in the Making: IPBES Legitimization Politics," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 17(1), pages 59-76, February.
    15. Martin Kowarsch & Jason Jabbour & Christian Flachsland & Marcel T. J. Kok & Robert Watson & Peter M. Haas & Jan C. Minx & Joseph Alcamo & Jennifer Garard & Pauline Riousset & László Pintér & Cameron L, 2017. "A road map for global environmental assessments," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 7(6), pages 379-382, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karl Dudman & Sara Wit, 2021. "An IPCC that listens: introducing reciprocity to climate change communication," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 168(1), pages 1-12, September.
    2. Matteo De Donà, 2022. "‘Getting the Science Right’? Epistemic Framings of Global Soil and Land Degradation," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, August.
    3. Friederike Hartz, 2024. "“We are not droids”– IPCC participants’ senses of responsibility and affective experiences across the production, assessment, communication and enactment of climate science," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 177(6), pages 1-21, June.
    4. Adeyeye, Yemi & Hagerman, Shannon & Pelai, Ricardo, 2019. "Seeking procedural equity in global environmental governance: Indigenous participation and knowledge politics in forest and landscape restoration debates at the 2016 World Conservation Congress," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    5. Monika Berg & Rolf Lidskog, 2018. "Pathways to deliberative capacity: the role of the IPCC," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 148(1), pages 11-24, May.
    6. Alejandro Esguerra & Sandra van der Hel, 2021. "Participatory Designs and Epistemic Authority in Knowledge Platforms for Sustainability," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 21(1), pages 130-151, Winter.
    7. Niklas Wagner & Anna-Katharina Hornidge, 2025. "Unlearning modernity? A critical examination of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 178(2), pages 1-29, February.
    8. Megan C Evans & Christopher Cvitanovic, 2018. "An introduction to achieving policy impact for early career researchers," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 1-12, December.
    9. Chukwumerije Okereke, 2017. "A six-component model for assessing procedural fairness in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 145(3), pages 509-522, December.
    10. Koo, Hongmi & Kleemann, Janina & Cuenca, Pablo & Noh, Jin Kyoung & Fürst, Christine, 2024. "Implications of landscape changes for ecosystem services and biodiversity: A national assessment in Ecuador," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    11. Ria Dunkley & Susan Baker & Natasha Constant & Angelina Sanderson-Bellamy, 2018. "Enabling the IPBES conceptual framework to work across knowledge boundaries," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 18(6), pages 779-799, December.
    12. Kari De Pryck, 2021. "Intergovernmental Expert Consensus in the Making: The Case of the Summary for Policy Makers of the IPCC 2014 Synthesis Report," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 21(1), pages 108-129, Winter.
    13. Kaiza R. Kaganzi & Aida Cuni-Sanchez & Fatuma Mcharazo & Emanuel H. Martin & Robert A. Marchant & Jessica P. R. Thorn, 2021. "Local Perceptions of Climate Change and Adaptation Responses from Two Mountain Regions in Tanzania," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-22, September.
    14. Saffron O’Neill & Roz Pidcock, 2021. "Introducing the Topical Collection: ‘Climate change communication and the IPCC’," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 169(3), pages 1-7, December.
    15. Linda Lütkes & Leonie Tuitjer & Peter Dirksmeier, 2023. "Sailing to save the planet? Media-produced narratives of Greta Thunberg’s trip to the UN Climate Summit in German print newspapers," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    16. Muradian, Roldan & Pascual, Unai, 2020. "Ecological economics in the age of fear," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    17. Kathryn Oliver & Annette Boaz, 2019. "Transforming evidence for policy and practice: creating space for new conversations," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-10, December.
    18. Haas, Peter M., 2018. "Preserving the epistemic authority of science in world politics," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Global Governance SP IV 2018-105, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    19. David Shim, 2024. "Personalising climate change—how activists from Fridays for Future visualise climate action on Instagram," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-9, December.
    20. Russell Clemens, 2025. "Combining the Viable System Model and Nature Futures Framework," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 1-38, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:178:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10584-025-03869-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.