IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/climat/v138y2016i3d10.1007_s10584-016-1756-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bridging the climate information gap: a framework for engaging knowledge brokers and decision makers in state climate assessments

Author

Listed:
  • Gillian L. Galford

    (University of Vermont
    University of Vermont)

  • Julie Nash

    (University of Vermont
    University of Vermont)

  • Alan K. Betts

    (Atmospheric Research)

  • Sam Carlson

    (University of Vermont
    University of Vermont)

  • Sarah Ford

    (University of Vermont
    University of Vermont)

  • Ann Hoogenboom

    (University of Vermont
    Cabot Creamery Cooperative
    University of Vermont)

  • Deborah Markowitz

    (Vermont Agency of Natural Resources)

  • Andrew Nash

    (NOAA/National Weather Service)

  • Elizabeth Palchak

    (University of Vermont
    University of Vermont)

  • Sarah Pears

    (University of Vermont
    University of Vermont)

  • Kristen L. Underwood

    (University of Vermont)

Abstract

Large-scale analyses like the National Climate Assessment (NCA) contain a wealth of information critical to national and regional responses to climate change but tend to be insufficiently detailed for action at state or local levels. Many states now engage in assessment processes to meet information needs for local authorities. The goals of state climate assessments (SCAs) should be to provide relevant, actionable information to state and local authorities, and to generate primary sources, build networks and inform stakeholders. To communicate local climate impacts to decision makers, SCAs should express credibility, salience and legitimacy. They can provide information (e.g., case studies, data sets) and connect stakeholders to the NCA and its process. Based on our experience in the Vermont Climate Assessment (VCA), we present a framework to engage decision makers in SCAs using a fluid network of scientific experts and knowledge brokers to conduct subject area prioritization, data analysis and writing. The VCA addressed economic, environmental and social impacts of climate change at local scales to increase resiliency and manage risk. Knowledge brokers communicated VCA findings through their own stakeholder networks. We include a qualitative impact evaluation, and believe our framework for interaction among scientists, knowledge brokers and stakeholders to be an effective structure for SCAs and a transformative experience for students.

Suggested Citation

  • Gillian L. Galford & Julie Nash & Alan K. Betts & Sam Carlson & Sarah Ford & Ann Hoogenboom & Deborah Markowitz & Andrew Nash & Elizabeth Palchak & Sarah Pears & Kristen L. Underwood, 2016. "Bridging the climate information gap: a framework for engaging knowledge brokers and decision makers in state climate assessments," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 138(3), pages 383-395, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:138:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s10584-016-1756-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s10584-016-1756-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10584-016-1756-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10584-016-1756-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Katharine Jacobs & James Buizer, 2016. "Building community, credibility and knowledge: the third US National Climate Assessment," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 135(1), pages 9-22, March.
    2. Emily Cloyd & Susanne C. Moser & Edward Maibach & Julie Maldonado & Tinqiao Chen, 2016. "Engagement in the Third U.S. National Climate Assessment: commitment, capacity, and communication for impact," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 135(1), pages 39-54, March.
    3. Katharine Hayhoe & Cameron Wake & Bruce Anderson & Xin-Zhong Liang & Edwin Maurer & Jinhong Zhu & James Bradbury & Art DeGaetano & Anne Stoner & Donald Wuebbles, 2008. "Regional climate change projections for the Northeast USA," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 13(5), pages 425-436, June.
    4. Cash, David & Clark, William & Alcock, Frank & Dickson, Nancy & Eckley, Noelle & Jager, Jill, 2002. "Salience, Credibility, Legitimacy and Boundaries: Linking Research, Assessment and Decision Making," Working Paper Series rwp02-046, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    5. Emily Cloyd & Susanne Moser & Edward Maibach & Julie Maldonado & Tinqiao Chen, 2016. "Engagement in the Third U.S. National Climate Assessment: commitment, capacity, and communication for impact," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 135(1), pages 39-54, March.
    6. Maria Carmen Lemos & Christine J. Kirchhoff & Vijay Ramprasad, 2012. "Narrowing the climate information usability gap," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 2(11), pages 789-794, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Melissa Widhalm & Jeffrey S. Dukes, 2020. "Introduction to the Indiana Climate Change Impacts Assessment: overview of the process and context," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 163(4), pages 1869-1879, December.
    2. Hauer, Mathew & Santos-Lozada, Alexis R, 2017. "Inaction on climate change projected to reduce European life expectancy," SocArXiv ngtxr, Center for Open Science.
    3. Timothy R. Petty & John B. Gongwer & William Schnabel, 2018. "Bridging policy and science action boundaries: information influences on US congressional legislative key staff decision making in natural resources," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 51(1), pages 77-96, March.
    4. McNie, Elizabeth C. & Parris, Adam & Sarewitz, Daniel, 2016. "Improving the public value of science: A typology to inform discussion, design and implementation of research," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 884-895.
    5. Mathew E. Hauer & Alexis R. Santos-Lozada, 2021. "Inaction on Climate Change Projected to Reduce European Life Expectancy," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 40(3), pages 629-638, June.
    6. Kristjanson, Patti & Reid, Robin & Dickson, Nancy & Clark, William C. & Vishnubhotla, Prasad & Romney, Dannie & Bezkorowajnyj, Peter & Said, Mohammed & Kaelo, Dickson & Makui, Ogeli & Nkedianye, David, 2008. "Linking International Agricultural Research Knowledge with Action for Sustainable Poverty Alleviation: What Works?," Working Paper Series rwp08-045, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    7. Xueke Li & Amanda H. Lynch, 2023. "New insights into projected Arctic sea road: operational risks, economic values, and policy implications," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 176(4), pages 1-16, April.
    8. Chris Knudson & Zack Guido, 2019. "The missing middle of climate services: layering multiway, two-way, and one-way modes of communicating seasonal climate forecasts," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 157(1), pages 171-187, November.
    9. Ojha, Hemant & Regmi, Udeep & Shrestha, Krishna K. & Paudel, Naya Sharma & Amatya, Swoyambhu Man & Zwi, Anthony B. & Nuberg, Ian & Cedamon, Edwin & Banjade, Mani R., 2020. "Improving science-policy interface: Lessons from the policy lab methodology in Nepal's community forest governance," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    10. Zeigermann, Ulrike & Böcher, Michael, 2020. "Challenges for bridging the gap between knowledge and governance in sustainability policy – The case of OECD ‘Focal Points’ for Policy Coherence for Development," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    11. Bullock Graham, 2015. "Signaling the credibility of private actors as public agents: transparency, independence, and expertise in environmental evaluations of products and companies," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 17(2), pages 177-219, August.
    12. Kevin Raaphorst & Gerben Koers & Gerald Jan Ellen & Amy Oen & Bjørn Kalsnes & Lisa van Well & Jana Koerth & Rutger van der Brugge, 2020. "Mind the Gap: Towards a Typology of Climate Service Usability Gaps," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    13. Dragana Bojovic & Andria Nicodemou & Asun Lera St.Clair & Isadora Christel & Francisco J. Doblas-Reyes, 2022. "Exploring the landscape of seasonal forecast provision by Global Producing Centres," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 172(1), pages 1-23, May.
    14. Sébastien Chailleux, 2020. "Making the subsurface political: How enhanced oil recovery techniques reshaped the energy transition," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 38(4), pages 733-750, June.
    15. Svenja Keele, 2019. "Consultants and the business of climate services: implications of shifting from public to private science," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 157(1), pages 9-26, November.
    16. Zack Guido & Sara Lopus & Kurt Waldman & Corrie Hannah & Andrew Zimmer & Natasha Krell & Chris Knudson & Lyndon Estes & Kelly Caylor & Tom Evans, 2021. "Perceived links between climate change and weather forecast accuracy: new barriers to tools for agricultural decision-making," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 168(1), pages 1-20, September.
    17. Richard H. Moss, 2016. "Assessing decision support systems and levels of confidence to narrow the climate information “usability gap”," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 135(1), pages 143-155, March.
    18. Garrett Ward Richards, 2019. "The Science–Policy Relationship Hierarchy (SPRHi) model of co-production: how climate science organizations have influenced the policy process in Canadian case studies," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 52(1), pages 67-95, March.
    19. Naser Valizadeh & Latif Haji & Masoud Bijani & Negin Fallah Haghighi & Mahsa Fatemi & Ants-Hannes Viira & Yenny Katherine Parra-Acosta & Alishir Kurban & Hossein Azadi, 2021. "Development of a Scale to Remove Farmers’ Sustainability Barriers to Meteorological Information in Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-18, November.
    20. Pieter T. Boer & Geert W. J. Frederix & Talitha L. Feenstra & Pepijn Vemer, 2016. "Unremarked or Unperformed? Systematic Review on Reporting of Validation Efforts of Health Economic Decision Models in Seasonal Influenza and Early Breast Cancer," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 34(9), pages 833-845, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:138:y:2016:i:3:d:10.1007_s10584-016-1756-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.