IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/climat/v178y2025i5d10.1007_s10584-025-03906-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The social sciences in climate assessments in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Keely B. Maxwell

    (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency)

  • Maureen Shacklette

    (Oak Ridge Associated Universities)

  • Emily Eisenhauer

    (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency)

  • Austin A. Scheetz

    (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine)

  • Elizabeth Marino

    (Oregon State University- Cascades)

  • Ariela Zycherman

    (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration)

Abstract

This article looks at the inclusion of the social sciences in recent climate assessment reports from national and sub-national jurisdictions (state, territory, district) of the United States. It compares and contrasts interdisciplinary integration based on three criteria: inclusion of societal topics; the use of social science frameworks, theory, and literature to interpret findings; and processes of knowledge production. National and sub-national climate assessments serve different societal purposes and decision-making goals, and are produced in distinct knowledge governance contexts. While climate focused social sciences are increasingly incorporated into assessments, the nature of this incorporation varies across assessment types. The greatest advancements for interdisciplinary integration in the Fifth National Climate Assessment are in the robust treatment of economics, equity and environmental justice, and social systems and the addition of core concepts to the climate lexicon. In sub-national assessments, alternative organizational formats open up space to examine climate-society interactions for sectoral or geographic topics of interest. However, their analysis often is limited to vulnerability mapping and dollar values instead of the broader social and economic systems that shape climate drivers, hazards, impacts, and responses. Most social sciences are present in climate impacts chapters. There is opportunity to engage additional social science in analysis of climate hazards, drivers of climate change, mitigation and adaptation efforts, and the underlying social causes of vulnerability. Better integration of the social and biogeophysical sciences can help assessments expand the language of climate response and universe of potential interventions, enabling them to inform decision-making at national to local scales.

Suggested Citation

  • Keely B. Maxwell & Maureen Shacklette & Emily Eisenhauer & Austin A. Scheetz & Elizabeth Marino & Ariela Zycherman, 2025. "The social sciences in climate assessments in the United States," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 178(5), pages 1-20, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:178:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s10584-025-03906-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10584-025-03906-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10584-025-03906-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10584-025-03906-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:178:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s10584-025-03906-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.