IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/climat/v123y2014i2p107-119.html

Shifting discourses of climate change in India

Author

Listed:
  • Jagadish Thaker

  • Anthony Leiserowitz

Abstract

Developing countries like India are under international pressure to sign a legally binding emissions treaty to avert catastrophic climatic change. Developing countries, however, have argued that any international agreement must be based on historic and per capita carbon emissions, with developed countries responsible for reducing their emissions first and funding mitigation and adaptation in other countries. Recently, however, several scholars have argued that Indian government climate change discourses are shifting, primarily by recognizing the “co-benefits” of an alignment between its development and climate change objectives, and by displaying increasing “flexibility” on mitigation targets. This study investigates the factors driving shifting Indian discourses of climate change by conducting and analyzing 25 interviews of Indian climate policy elites, including scientists, energy policy experts, leading government officials, journalists, business leaders, and advocates, in addition to analysis of articles published in Economic and Political Weekly (a prominent Indian policy journal), and reports published by the government and other agencies. Our analysis suggests that India’s concerns about increasing energy access and security, along with newer concerns about vulnerability to climate change and the international leadership aspirations of the Indian government, along with emergence of new actors and institutions, has led to plurality of discourses, with potential implications for India’s climate change policies. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Suggested Citation

  • Jagadish Thaker & Anthony Leiserowitz, 2014. "Shifting discourses of climate change in India," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 123(2), pages 107-119, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:123:y:2014:i:2:p:107-119
    DOI: 10.1007/s10584-014-1059-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10584-014-1059-6
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10584-014-1059-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:wbk:wbpubs:2315 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Katharina Michaelowa & Axel Michaelowa, 2012. "India as an emerging power in international climate negotiations," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(5), pages 575-590, September.
    3. repec:wbk:wbpubs:28241 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. repec:wbk:wbpubs:11855 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Navroz K. Dubash & Lavanya Rajamani, 2010. "Beyond Copenhagen: next steps," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(6), pages 593-599, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andreas Schmidt & Mike Schäfer, 2015. "Constructions of climate justice in German, Indian and US media," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 133(3), pages 535-549, December.
    2. Adani Azhoni & Ian Holman & Simon Jude, 2024. "Climate change adaptation attributes across scales and inter-institutional networks: insights from national and state level water management institutions in India," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 29(6), pages 1-25, August.
    3. Joyeeta Gupta & Arthur Rempel & Hebe Verrest, 2020. "Access and allocation: the role of large shareholders and investors in leaving fossil fuels underground," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 303-322, June.
    4. Jakob Skovgaard, 2017. "Limiting costs or correcting market failures? Finance ministries and frame alignment in UN climate finance negotiations," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 89-106, February.
    5. Mrkajic, Vladimir & Vukelic, Djordje & Mihajlov, Andjelka, 2015. "Reduction of CO2 emission and non-environmental co-benefits of bicycle infrastructure provision: the case of the University of Novi Sad, Serbia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 232-242.
    6. Gupta, Kuhika & Ripberger, Joseph T. & Fox, Andrew S. & Jenkins-Smith, Hank C. & Silva, Carol L., 2021. "The future of nuclear energy in India: Evidence from a nationwide survey," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    7. Deepak Gopinath, 2016. "Why a clearer ‘green industrial policy’ matters for India: Reconciling growth, climate change and inequality," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 31(8), pages 830-835, December.
    8. Jan Mayrhofer & Joyeeta Gupta, 2016. "The politics of co-benefits in India’s energy sector," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(7), pages 1344-1363, November.
    9. Eric K Chu, 2018. "Urban climate adaptation and the reshaping of state–society relations: The politics of community knowledge and mobilisation in Indore, India," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(8), pages 1766-1782, June.
    10. Vyoma Jha, 2022. "India and Climate Change: Old Traditions, New Strategies," India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, , vol. 78(2), pages 280-296, June.
    11. Joyeeta Gupta & Arthur Rempel & Hebe Verrest, 0. "Access and allocation: the role of large shareholders and investors in leaving fossil fuels underground," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-20.
    12. Neha B Joseph & Navroz K Dubash, 2015. "The Institutionalisation of Climate Policy in India: Designing a Development-Focused, Co-Benefits Based Approach," Working Papers id:6993, eSocialSciences.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aviel Verbruggen, 2011. "A Turbo Drive for the Global Reduction of Energy-Related CO 2 Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Pickering, Jonathan & Jotzo, Frank & Wood, Peter J., 2015. "Splitting the difference: can limited coordination achieve a fair distribution of the global climate financing effort?," Working Papers 249508, Australian National University, Centre for Climate Economics & Policy.
    3. J. Timmons Roberts & Romain Weikmans, 2017. "Postface: fragmentation, failing trust and enduring tensions over what counts as climate finance," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 129-137, February.
    4. Nölke Andreas, 2013. "A Political Economy Explanation for Country Variation in IFRS Adoption – A Comment on ‘The International Politics of IFRS Harmonization’ by K. Ramanna," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 3(2), pages 69-76, January.
    5. Joyeeta Gupta & Arthur Rempel & Hebe Verrest, 2020. "Access and allocation: the role of large shareholders and investors in leaving fossil fuels underground," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 303-322, June.
    6. Pamela S. Chasek & Lynn M. Wagner, 2016. "Breaking the mold: a new type of multilateral sustainable development negotiation," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 397-413, June.
    7. Never, Babette, 2013. "Toward the Green Economy: Assessing Countries' Green Power," GIGA Working Papers 226, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    8. Choyon Kumar Saha, 2024. "Least developed countries versus fossil fuel incumbents: strategies, divisions, and barriers at the United Nations climate negotiations," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 91-120, March.
    9. Joyeeta Gupta & Arthur Rempel & Hebe Verrest, 0. "Access and allocation: the role of large shareholders and investors in leaving fossil fuels underground," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-20.
    10. Vyoma Jha, 2022. "India and Climate Change: Old Traditions, New Strategies," India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, , vol. 78(2), pages 280-296, June.
    11. Meckler, Sacha Rene, 2017. "Causes and Impacts of Deficient Liability for Climate Change Damage, and an Economic Conception for Climate Change Liability That Supports Appropriate Action: DRaCULA," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 288-298.
    12. Never, Babette & Betz, Joachim, 2014. "Comparing the Climate Policy Performance of Emerging Economies," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1-15.
    13. Jan Mayrhofer & Joyeeta Gupta, 2016. "The politics of co-benefits in India’s energy sector," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(7), pages 1344-1363, November.
    14. Joanna Depledge, 2022. "The “top-down” Kyoto Protocol? Exploring caricature and misrepresentation in literature on global climate change governance," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 673-692, December.
    15. Jennifer Morgan & Eliza Northrop, 2017. "Will the Paris Agreement accelerate the pace of change?," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(5), September.
    16. Neha B Joseph & Navroz K Dubash, 2015. "The Institutionalisation of Climate Policy in India: Designing a Development-Focused, Co-Benefits Based Approach," Working Papers id:6993, eSocialSciences.
    17. Katarina Buhr & Susanna Roth & Peter Stigson, 2014. "Climate Change Politics through a Global Pledge-and-Review Regime: Positions among Negotiators and Stakeholders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-18, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:climat:v:123:y:2014:i:2:p:107-119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.