IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/aphecp/v7y2009i3p149-154.html

Value-based insurance design in medicare

Author

Listed:
  • William Encinosa

Abstract

Drug benefits have responded to the rise in drug costs by increasing patient cost sharing. However, many now realize that increasing cost sharing for high-value preventive-care drugs can be detrimental in terms of reducing patient drug adherence and causing increased inpatient and outpatient costs. Value-based insurance design (VBID) deals with this by decreasing the co-payments for high-value preventive-care drugs and raising copayments for drugs with less value. The Medicare Part D drug benefit in the US could benefit greatly from VBID, especially since the Part D stand-alone plans currently have no incentive to reduce inpatient and outpatient costs. While VBID will improve outcomes and avert hospitalizations, it will not result in net cost savings since high drug prices usually overwhelm any inpatient and outpatient cost offsets. Thus, for VBID to reap net cost savings, it must be combined with value-based purchasing of drugs, and it must move beyond just the lowering of copayments and increase incentives by giving rebates to patients so that they can share in the cost savings of improved drug adherence. Copyright Adis Data Information BV 2009

Suggested Citation

  • William Encinosa, 2009. "Value-based insurance design in medicare," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 149-154, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:7:y:2009:i:3:p:149-154
    DOI: 10.1007/BF03256148
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF03256148
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF03256148?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Avi Dor & William Encinosa, 2004. "How Does Cost-Sharing Affect Drug Purchases? Insurance Regimes in the Private Market for Prescription Drugs," NBER Working Papers 10738, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Amitabh Chandra & Jonathan Gruber & Robin McKnight, 2007. "Patient Cost-Sharing, Hospitalization Offsets, and the Design of Optimal Health Insurance for the Elderly," NBER Working Papers 12972, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Helen Levy & David R. Weir, 2010. "Take-up of Medicare Part D: Results From the Health and Retirement Study," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 65(4), pages 492-501.
    4. Avi Dor, 2004. "Optimal Price Rules, Administered Prices and Suboptimal Prevention: Evidence from a Medicare Program," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 81-104, January.
    5. Gaynor Martin & Li Jian & Vogt William B, 2007. "Substitution, Spending Offsets, and Prescription Drug Benefit Design," Forum for Health Economics & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 10(2), pages 1-33, July.
    6. Amitabh Chandra & Jonathan Gruber & Robin McKnight, 2010. "Patient Cost-Sharing and Hospitalization Offsets in the Elderly," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(1), pages 193-213, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert Kaestner & Cuping Schiman & G. Caleb Alexander, 2019. "Effects of Prescription Drug Insurance on Hospitalization and Mortality: Evidence from Medicare Part D," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 86(3), pages 595-628, September.
    2. William Encinosa & Didem Bernard & Avi Dor, 2010. "Does Prescription Drug Adherence Reduce Hospitalizations and Costs?," NBER Working Papers 15691, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Nicolas Ziebarth, 2014. "Assessing the effectiveness of health care cost containment measures: evidence from the market for rehabilitation care," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 41-67, March.
    4. Aparna Soni, 2024. "Estimating price elasticities of demand for pain relief drugs: evidence from Medicare Part D," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 481-515, December.
    5. Alan M. Garber & Jonathan Skinner, 2008. "Is American Health Care Uniquely Inefficient?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 22(4), pages 27-50, Fall.
    6. Ponzo, Michela & Scoppa, Vincenzo, 2016. "Cost-Sharing and Use of Health Services in Italy: Evidence from a Fuzzy Regression Discontinuity Design," IZA Discussion Papers 9772, IZA Network @ LISER.
    7. Borrescio-Higa, Florencia, 2015. "Can Walmart make us healthier? Prescription drug prices and health care utilization," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 37-53.
    8. Américo, Pedro & Rocha, Rudi, 2020. "Subsidizing access to prescription drugs and health outcomes: The case of diabetes," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    9. Ponzo, Michela & Scoppa, Vincenzo, 2021. "Does demand for health services depend on cost-sharing? Evidence from Italy," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    10. Yoshimura, Akihiro & Takaku, Reo, 2025. "Medium-run effects of patient cost-sharing on the demand-side and supply-side of inpatient care: A natural experiment in Japan," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    11. Glazer Jacob & Huskamp Haiden A. & McGuire Thomas G., 2012. "A Prescription for Drug Formulary Evaluation: An Application of Price Indexes," Forum for Health Economics & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 15(1), pages 1-26, March.
    12. Chandra, Amitabh & Gruber, Jonathan & McKnight, Robin, 2014. "The impact of patient cost-sharing on low-income populations: Evidence from Massachusetts," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 57-66.
    13. Nilsson, Anton & Paul, Alexander, 2018. "Patient cost-sharing, socioeconomic status, and children's health care utilization," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 109-124.
    14. Gary V. Engelhardt & Jonathan Gruber, 2010. "Medicare Part D and the Financial Protection of the Elderly," NBER Working Papers 16155, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Abraham Jean M. & Royalty Anne Beeson & DeLeire Thomas, 2013. "Measuring the Financial Exposure from Medical Care Spending Among Families with Employer Sponsored Insurance," Forum for Health Economics & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 16(1), pages 193-217, July.
    16. Herr, A. & Suppliet, M., 2011. "Co-Payment Exemptions and Reference Prices: an Empirical Study of Pharmaceutical Prices in Germany," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 11/18, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    17. Kurt Lavetti & Thomas DeLeire & Nicolas R. Ziebarth, 2023. "How do low‐income enrollees in the Affordable Care Act marketplaces respond to cost‐sharing?," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 90(1), pages 155-183, March.
    18. Marianne Simonsen & Lars Skipper & Niels Skipper, 2016. "Price Sensitivity of Demand for Prescription Drugs: Exploiting a Regression Kink Design," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 320-337, March.
    19. Buntin Melinda & Hayford Tamara, 2016. "Evidence of Inefficiencies in Practice Patterns: Regional Variation in Medicare Medical and Drug Spending," Forum for Health Economics & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 19(2), pages 299-331, December.
    20. Fukushima, Kazuya & Mizuoka, Sou & Yamamoto, Shunsuke & Iizuka, Toshiaki, 2016. "Patient cost sharing and medical expenditures for the Elderly," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 115-130.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:aphecp:v:7:y:2009:i:3:p:149-154. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.