IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v338y2024i1d10.1007_s10479-023-05489-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A distributionally robust approach for the two-machine permutation flow shop scheduling

Author

Listed:
  • Haimin Lu

    (Zhejiang University of Technology)

  • Zhi Pei

    (Zhejiang University of Technology)

Abstract

We consider the two-machine permutation flow shop scheduling problem with uncertain job processing time, which is sampled from no specific distribution type. For the ease of discussion, an ambiguity set with a priori mean and support set information is constructed. We then introduce a distributionally robust optimization (DRO) perspective to handle the uncertainty. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that a DRO method is applied to this problem setting. Given that the original DRO model is nonlinear and intractable in nature, we first reformulate the inner maximization problem into a linear programming model with a fixed sequence, based on the duality theory and optimality conditions. By including the sequence decision, we further transform it into an equivalent mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) problem via incorporating the valid lower and upper bounds and McCormick inequalities. The obtained MILP could be solved to optimality with the off-the-shelf commercial solvers. In the numerical study, it is demonstrated that the DRO-based model could effectively solve the large scale instances with up to 100 jobs optimally within 30 s. Compared with the SLP, DRO model always triumphs on the worst-case indicator. And as the problem scale increases, the DRO model gradually outperforms the SLP in terms of the Up-90% and Up-75% indicators. Furthermore, the optimal sequence obtained by the deterministic model is less stable than the DRO model, which can enhance the robustness of the manufacturing system against processing uncertainty.

Suggested Citation

  • Haimin Lu & Zhi Pei, 2024. "A distributionally robust approach for the two-machine permutation flow shop scheduling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 338(1), pages 709-739, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:338:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-023-05489-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-023-05489-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-023-05489-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-023-05489-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Levorato, Mario & Figueiredo, Rosa & Frota, Yuri, 2022. "Exact solutions for the two-machine robust flow shop with budgeted uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(1), pages 46-57.
    2. Chin-Chia Wu & Jatinder N. D. Gupta & Shuenn-Ren Cheng & Bertrand M. T. Lin & Siu-Hung Yip & Win-Chin Lin, 2021. "Robust scheduling for a two-stage assembly shop with scenario-dependent processing times," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(17), pages 5372-5387, September.
    3. Shehadeh, Karmel S. & Padman, Rema, 2021. "A distributionally robust optimization approach for stochastic elective surgery scheduling with limited intensive care unit capacity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(3), pages 901-913.
    4. Wang, Zhuolin & You, Keyou & Song, Shiji & Zhang, Yuli, 2020. "Wasserstein distributionally robust shortest path problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(1), pages 31-43.
    5. Esteban Feuerstein & Alberto Marchetti-Spaccamela & Frans Schalekamp & René Sitters & Suzanne Ster & Leen Stougie & Anke Zuylen, 2017. "Minimizing worst-case and average-case makespan over scenarios," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 20(6), pages 545-555, December.
    6. Chang, Zhiqi & Ding, Jian-Ya & Song, Shiji, 2019. "Distributionally robust scheduling on parallel machines under moment uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(3), pages 832-846.
    7. Moslehi, G. & Mirzaee, M. & Vasei, M. & Modarres, M. & Azaron, A., 2009. "Two-machine flow shop scheduling to minimize the sum of maximum earliness and tardiness," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 763-773, December.
    8. Lu, Haimin & Pei, Zhi, 2023. "Single machine scheduling with release dates: A distributionally robust approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(1), pages 19-37.
    9. Novak, Antonin & Gnatowski, Andrzej & Sucha, Premysl, 2022. "Distributionally robust scheduling algorithms for total flow time minimization on parallel machines using norm regularizations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(2), pages 438-455.
    10. Wang, Yu & Zhang, Yu & Tang, Jiafu, 2019. "A distributionally robust optimization approach for surgery block allocation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(2), pages 740-753.
    11. Shushang Zhu & Masao Fukushima, 2009. "Worst-Case Conditional Value-at-Risk with Application to Robust Portfolio Management," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(5), pages 1155-1168, October.
    12. Xin Feng & Feifeng Zheng & Yinfeng Xu, 2016. "Robust scheduling of a two-stage hybrid flow shop with uncertain interval processing times," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(12), pages 3706-3717, June.
    13. Ruiwei Jiang & Siqian Shen & Yiling Zhang, 2017. "Integer Programming Approaches for Appointment Scheduling with Random No-Shows and Service Durations," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(6), pages 1638-1656, December.
    14. Pei, Zhi & Lu, Haimin & Jin, Qingwei & Zhang, Lianmin, 2022. "Target-based distributionally robust optimization for single machine scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(2), pages 420-431.
    15. Shehadeh, Karmel S. & Cohn, Amy E.M. & Jiang, Ruiwei, 2020. "A distributionally robust optimization approach for outpatient colonoscopy scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(2), pages 549-561.
    16. Framinan, Jose M. & Perez-Gonzalez, Paz, 2015. "On heuristic solutions for the stochastic flowshop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(2), pages 413-420.
    17. Chang, Zhiqi & Song, Shiji & Zhang, Yuli & Ding, Jian-Ya & Zhang, Rui & Chiong, Raymond, 2017. "Distributionally robust single machine scheduling with risk aversion," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(1), pages 261-274.
    18. Erick Delage & Yinyu Ye, 2010. "Distributionally Robust Optimization Under Moment Uncertainty with Application to Data-Driven Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(3), pages 595-612, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lu, Haimin & Pei, Zhi, 2023. "Single machine scheduling with release dates: A distributionally robust approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(1), pages 19-37.
    2. Yin, Yunqiang & Luo, Zunhao & Wang, Dujuan & Cheng, T.C.E., 2023. "Wasserstein distance‐based distributionally robust parallel‐machine scheduling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    3. Shehadeh, Karmel S. & Padman, Rema, 2021. "A distributionally robust optimization approach for stochastic elective surgery scheduling with limited intensive care unit capacity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(3), pages 901-913.
    4. Novak, Antonin & Gnatowski, Andrzej & Sucha, Premysl, 2022. "Distributionally robust scheduling algorithms for total flow time minimization on parallel machines using norm regularizations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(2), pages 438-455.
    5. Davide Lauria & Giorgio Consigli & Francesca Maggioni, 2022. "Optimal chance-constrained pension fund management through dynamic stochastic control," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 44(3), pages 967-1007, September.
    6. Pei, Zhi & Lu, Haimin & Jin, Qingwei & Zhang, Lianmin, 2022. "Target-based distributionally robust optimization for single machine scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(2), pages 420-431.
    7. Chang, Zhiqi & Ding, Jian-Ya & Song, Shiji, 2019. "Distributionally robust scheduling on parallel machines under moment uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(3), pages 832-846.
    8. Novak, Antonin & Sucha, Premysl & Novotny, Matej & Stec, Richard & Hanzalek, Zdenek, 2022. "Scheduling jobs with normally distributed processing times on parallel machines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(2), pages 422-441.
    9. Chen, Qingxin & Fu, Chenyi & Zhu, Ning & Ma, Shoufeng & He, Qiao-Chu, 2023. "A target-based optimization model for bike-sharing systems: From the perspective of service efficiency and equity," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 235-260.
    10. Guopeng Song & Roel Leus, 2022. "Parallel Machine Scheduling Under Uncertainty: Models and Exact Algorithms," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(6), pages 3059-3079, November.
    11. Jin, Zhongyi & Ng, Kam K.H. & Zhang, Chenliang & Liu, Wei & Zhang, Fangni & Xu, Gangyan, 2024. "A risk-averse distributionally robust optimisation approach for drone-supported relief facility location problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    12. J. Behnamian & Z. Gharabaghli, 2023. "Multi-objective outpatient scheduling in health centers considering resource constraints and service quality: a robust optimization approach," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 1-35, March.
    13. Xiaojiao Tong & Hailin Sun & Xiao Luo & Quanguo Zheng, 2018. "Distributionally robust chance constrained optimization for economic dispatch in renewable energy integrated systems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 70(1), pages 131-158, January.
    14. Wang, Fan & Zhang, Chao & Zhang, Hui & Xu, Liang, 2021. "Short-term physician rescheduling model with feature-driven demand for mental disorders outpatients," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    15. Martin Branda & Max Bucher & Michal Červinka & Alexandra Schwartz, 2018. "Convergence of a Scholtes-type regularization method for cardinality-constrained optimization problems with an application in sparse robust portfolio optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 70(2), pages 503-530, June.
    16. Yu Wang & Yu Zhang & Minglong Zhou & Jiafu Tang, 2023. "Feature‐driven robust surgery scheduling," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(6), pages 1921-1938, June.
    17. Shehadeh, Karmel S. & Cohn, Amy E.M. & Jiang, Ruiwei, 2020. "A distributionally robust optimization approach for outpatient colonoscopy scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(2), pages 549-561.
    18. Feng, Yuqiang & Che, Ada & Tian, Na, 2024. "Robust inventory routing problem under uncertain demand and risk-averse criterion," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    19. A. Paç & Mustafa Pınar, 2014. "Robust portfolio choice with CVaR and VaR under distribution and mean return ambiguity," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 22(3), pages 875-891, October.
    20. Ketkov, Sergey S., 2024. "A study of distributionally robust mixed-integer programming with Wasserstein metric: on the value of incomplete data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 313(2), pages 602-615.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:338:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10479-023-05489-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.